Core Viewpoint - The joint statement by Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile emphasizes the importance of self-discipline, integrity, and innovation in the automotive industry to foster a healthy competitive environment and enhance the overall image and competitiveness of China's automotive sector [1][4][9]. Group 1: Joint Statement and Industry Call - The three parties call for strict self-discipline in product development, testing, and promotion, urging the industry to adhere to principles of integrity and commercial ethics, and to eliminate any form of unfair competition [1][9]. - They advocate for a focus on core technology innovation and improving vehicle safety performance, encouraging the industry to prioritize genuine user experiences and technological advancements to drive industry upgrades [1][9]. Group 2: Clarification of Testing Incident - Li Auto clarifies that the purpose of the recent crash test involving the Li Auto i8 was to validate and enhance its passive safety performance, not to target any other brand's vehicle safety or quality [4][6]. - China Automotive Engineering Research Institute acknowledges its failure to clearly communicate the context of the test, which led to public misunderstandings regarding the involvement of Dongfeng Liuzhou's vehicles [6][9]. Group 3: Commitment to Quality and Integrity - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasizes its commitment to high quality and reliability, focusing on continuous innovation and strengthening core technologies to provide better transportation solutions [7][9]. - All three parties express their commitment to resisting unfair competition and adhering to legal and compliant business practices, contributing to the transformation of China from a major automotive country to a strong automotive nation [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement by Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (CAERI), and Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor aims to clarify the recent controversy surrounding the crash test of the Li Auto i8, emphasizing the importance of transparency in automotive testing and brand image protection [3][10]. Group 1: Li Auto's Position - The purpose of the crash test was to validate and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, not to evaluate the safety and quality of other brands [3][10]. - Li Auto expressed sincere apologies for the unintended negative publicity affecting Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand image and acknowledged the miscommunication that led to public misunderstanding [3][10]. - The company committed to taking further measures to prevent similar controversies in the future [4][11]. Group 2: China Automotive Engineering Research Institute's Role - CAERI, as the executing agency for the test, admitted to failing to clearly communicate that the Dongfeng Liuzhou vehicle was used solely as a "mobile barrier" and that the test did not assess its safety or quality [5][12]. - The institute acknowledged shortcomings in risk management and pledged to improve its testing management mechanisms while adhering to scientific and objective principles [6][12]. Group 3: Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's Commitment - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasized its commitment to high-quality and reliable products, focusing on continuous innovation and core technology enhancement [7][13]. - The company stated its dedication to lawful and compliant operations, contributing to China's transition from a major automotive nation to a strong automotive power [8][13]. Group 4: Joint Industry Initiatives - The three parties called for strict self-discipline within the automotive industry, advocating for integrity and ethical practices in product development, testing, and marketing [9][14]. - They urged the industry to focus on enhancing vehicle safety performance, core technology innovation, and optimizing user experience to elevate the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive sector [9][14]. - The joint effort aims to build a sustainable automotive ecosystem based on safety, technology, and integrity, promoting high-quality development in the industry [9][14].

Core Viewpoint - The recent collision test involving Li Auto's i8 and a Dongfeng Liuzhou truck has sparked significant public concern, leading to a joint statement from Li Auto, China Automotive Research Institute (CARI), and Dongfeng Liuzhou, emphasizing the importance of ethical competition and focusing on core technological innovation [5][8]. Group 1: Joint Statement and Apologies - Li Auto, CARI, and Dongfeng Liuzhou have issued a joint statement addressing the incident, clarifying that the test aimed to validate the passive safety performance of the Li i8 and was not intended to evaluate the safety or quality of other brands [5][6]. - Li Auto expressed sincere apologies for the unintended negative impact on Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand image due to the test's publicity, acknowledging the potential for public misunderstanding [5][6]. - CARI admitted to failing to clearly communicate the purpose of the test and the use of the Dongfeng Liuzhou truck as a "mobile barrier," which led to public misconceptions [6]. Group 2: Industry Response and Future Actions - Dongfeng Liuzhou reaffirmed its commitment to ethical competition and high-quality standards, emphasizing its dedication to innovation and customer value [6][7]. - The three parties collectively called for the automotive industry to adhere to ethical principles in product development, testing, and marketing, discouraging any form of unfair competition [8]. - They advocated for a focus on enhancing vehicle safety, core technological innovation, and improving user experience to elevate the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive industry [8].

Core Viewpoint - The recent collision test involving the Li Auto i8 and a third-party vehicle (Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile's乘龙 brand) has sparked widespread public concern regarding the transparency of automotive product testing information, standard execution, and brand image protection [2] Group 1: Company Statements - Li Auto clarified that the purpose of the test was to verify and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, and it was not intended to question the safety and quality of any other brand's vehicles [2] - Li Auto expressed sincere apologies for the unintended negative impact on the Dongfeng Liuzhou brand due to the test, acknowledging the potential brand association risks and public misunderstandings [2] - China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (China Automotive Research) admitted that it failed to clearly communicate that the Dongfeng Liuzhou second-hand vehicle was used solely as a "mobile barrier vehicle" for the test, which led to public misconceptions [3] Group 2: Industry Initiatives - The three parties jointly called for the automotive industry to adhere to self-discipline, emphasizing the importance of integrity and commercial ethics in product development, testing, and promotion [4] - The industry is encouraged to focus resources on enhancing vehicle safety performance, core technology innovation, and optimizing user experience to drive industry upgrades and improve the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive sector [4] - The three parties expressed their commitment to building a safe, technology-driven, and integrity-based automotive ecosystem, promoting high-quality and sustainable development in the Chinese automotive industry [5]

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement from Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile aims to clarify the recent controversy surrounding the crash test of the Li Auto i8, emphasizing the importance of transparency and brand image protection in the automotive industry [2][3][4]. Group 1: Li Auto's Position - The purpose of the crash test was to verify and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, not to target the safety and quality of other brands [3]. - Li Auto expressed sincere apologies for the unintended negative impact on Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand image due to the test, acknowledging the insufficient risk assessment regarding the potential brand association [3]. Group 2: China Automotive Engineering Research Institute's Role - As the executing agency for the test, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute admitted to failing to clearly communicate that the Dongfeng Liuzhou vehicle was used as a "mobile barrier" and not as an evaluation of its safety and quality [4]. - The institute committed to improving its testing management mechanisms and maintaining scientific, objective, and neutral principles to uphold industry credibility [4]. Group 3: Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile's Commitment - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasized its commitment to high quality and reliable products, focusing on continuous innovation and core technology enhancement to create value for customers [5]. - The company pledged to resist unfair competition and adhere to legal and compliant business practices, contributing to the transformation of China from a major automotive country to a strong automotive nation [5]. Group 4: Joint Industry Initiative - The three parties called for strict self-discipline within the automotive industry, urging adherence to integrity and commercial ethics in product development, testing, and promotion [6]. - They advocated for a focus on core technology innovation and vehicle safety performance improvement to enhance the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive industry [6].

Core Viewpoint - The recent collision test involving the Li Auto i8 and a third-party vehicle (Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile) has sparked widespread public concern and discussions regarding the transparency of automotive product testing information, standard execution, and brand image protection [1][3]. Group 1: Joint Statement and Clarifications - On August 6, China Automotive Research (China Automotive Research Co., Ltd.) released a joint statement to clarify facts and eliminate misunderstandings regarding the Li Auto i8 collision test incident, involving Li Auto, China Automotive Research, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile [3]. - The three parties expressed their commitment to building a safe, technological, and integrity-based automotive industry ecosystem to promote high-quality and sustainable development in China's automotive industry [3]. Group 2: Li Auto's Position - Li Auto stated that the purpose of the test was to verify and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, and it was not intended to target the safety and quality performance of any other brand vehicles [6]. - Li Auto acknowledged the unintended negative impact on Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand image due to the incident and expressed sincere apologies for any misunderstandings caused to the public and customers [6]. Group 3: China Automotive Research's Role - China Automotive Research admitted that it failed to clearly communicate to the public that the Dongfeng Liuzhou vehicle was used as a "mobile barrier" for specific standard requirements, and the test did not evaluate its product safety and quality performance [6]. - The organization committed to improving its testing management mechanisms and maintaining scientific, objective, and neutral principles to uphold industry credibility [6]. Group 4: Dongfeng Liuzhou's Commitment - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasized its commitment to high quality and reliability, focusing on continuous innovation and strengthening core technologies to create value for customers [7]. - The company pledged to resist unfair competition and adhere to legal and compliant business practices, contributing to China's transition from a major automotive nation to a strong automotive nation [8]. Group 5: Industry Call to Action - The three parties jointly called for strict self-discipline within the automotive industry, urging adherence to integrity principles and commercial ethics in product development, testing, and promotion [9]. - They emphasized the importance of focusing resources on enhancing vehicle safety performance, core technology innovation, and optimizing user experiences to elevate the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive industry [9].

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement by Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile aims to clarify the misunderstanding surrounding the collision test of the Li Auto i8 and to maintain a positive industry ecosystem [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Li Auto's Position - The purpose of the test was to verify and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, not to question the safety and quality of any other brand's vehicles. Li Auto expressed sincere apologies for the unintended negative impact on Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand image due to the test [1][9]. China Automotive Engineering Research Institute's Position - As the executing agency for the test, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute acknowledged its failure to clearly communicate that the Dongfeng Liuzhou vehicle was used as a "mobile barrier" and not as an evaluation of its safety and quality. The institute committed to improving its testing management mechanisms and maintaining industry credibility [3][11]. Dongfeng Liuzhou Automobile's Position - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasized its commitment to high quality and reliable products, focusing on continuous innovation and compliance with legal standards. The company aims to contribute to China's transition from a major automotive nation to a strong automotive nation [4][12]. Joint Initiatives - The three parties called for strict self-discipline within the automotive industry, urging adherence to integrity and ethical business practices in product development, testing, and promotion. They emphasized the importance of accurate and complete information dissemination to maintain a fair market order [5][13]. - They also advocated for a focus on core technological innovation and enhancing vehicle safety performance to elevate the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive industry [6][14].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the collision test of the Li Auto i8 with a third-party vehicle, which led to public controversy and brand image concerns for Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor [1][2] - Li Auto acknowledged the insufficient assessment of the potential brand association risks and expressed sincere apologies for the misunderstanding caused to users and the public [1] - China Automotive Research (CARS) admitted to failing to clearly communicate the purpose of the second-hand Dongfeng Liuzhou vehicle used in the test, which was merely a "mobile barrier" and not an evaluation of its safety and quality [1] Group 2 - Dongfeng Liuzhou reiterated its commitment to high quality and reliability, emphasizing the importance of core technology and compliance with legal standards [2] - The three parties called for the industry to adhere to self-regulatory standards, avoiding unfair competition and ensuring rigorous testing and accurate information dissemination [2] - There is a collective push for the automotive industry to focus on enhancing vehicle safety, core technology innovation, and user experience to elevate the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive sector [2]

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement by Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor emphasizes the importance of self-discipline and integrity in the automotive industry, advocating for a focus on safety, technological innovation, and the enhancement of the industry's overall image and competitiveness [1][8][9] Group 1: Joint Statement and Industry Standards - The three parties call for strict self-discipline in product development, testing, and promotion, adhering to principles of honesty and commercial ethics, and eliminating any form of unfair competition such as disparaging comparisons [1][8] - They urge testing and certification organizations to maintain professional standards, ensuring that testing processes are scientific, rigorous, and that information released is truthful, accurate, and complete [1][8] Group 2: Incident Clarification and Apologies - The recent incident involving the crash test of the Li Auto i8 and a third-party vehicle (Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand) has sparked widespread public concern regarding the transparency of testing information and brand image protection [2] - Li Auto clarifies that the purpose of the test was to validate and enhance the passive safety performance of the i8, not to target the safety and quality of other brands [2][4] - Both China Automotive Engineering Research Institute and Li Auto acknowledge shortcomings in communication and risk assessment, leading to misunderstandings and negative publicity for Dongfeng Liuzhou [5][6] Group 3: Commitment to Improvement - China Automotive Engineering Research Institute commits to improving its testing management mechanisms and maintaining objectivity and neutrality in its evaluations to uphold industry credibility [5] - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasizes its commitment to high quality and reliable products, focusing on continuous innovation and resisting unfair competition [6][7]