Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) has reported 20 smart terminal devices for illegally collecting personal information, highlighting ongoing challenges in personal information protection despite increasing public awareness and legal frameworks [1][2]. Group 1: Current Issues in Personal Information Protection - There is a high incidence of personal information crimes, with over 2,100 cases and more than 4,400 individuals prosecuted for violating personal information rights in the first three quarters of 2025 [1]. - Smart terminal devices have vulnerabilities that are exploited due to manufacturers prioritizing functionality over security, leading to inadequate protection against hacking [1][2]. - Pre-installed, non-removable apps by operators collect data without user consent, turning devices into tools for data theft [1][2]. Group 2: Evolving Nature of Information Crimes - The methods of personal information infringement have evolved into a full-chain model involving "technical attacks + data processing + customized supply," with rapid technological advancements complicating protection efforts [2]. - Hackers utilize advanced techniques such as web crawlers, Trojan viruses, and penetration tools to illegally access personal information [2]. - The black and gray market for personal information is thriving, with criminals using AI technologies to gather and analyze data for downstream criminal activities [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - A multi-faceted defense system combining "technical protection + legal penalties + social governance" is essential for safeguarding personal information in the digital age [3]. - Companies should prioritize security measures over functional innovations, employing privacy algorithms and encrypted storage to ensure data is usable but not visible [3]. - Regulatory bodies need to enhance monitoring capabilities to detect and address risks early, while legal frameworks should be refined to increase penalties for violations [3]. - Public awareness campaigns and self-protection education are crucial for empowering citizens to safeguard their personal information [3].

Group 1 - The incidents involving the high-speed train and subway highlight issues of public order and individual responsibility, emphasizing that such behaviors are not trivial but have broader implications for societal norms and safety [2][3] - Legal frameworks, such as the Railway Safety Management Regulations and Public Security Administration Punishment Law, explicitly prohibit actions that disrupt transportation order and safety, indicating that adherence to these rules is essential for the smooth operation of public transport [2][3] - The enforcement of laws against such behaviors serves not only to punish but also to educate individuals on the importance of moral conduct in public spaces, reinforcing the idea that legal consequences are necessary for maintaining social order [3] Group 2 - The public's reaction to these incidents reflects a collective intolerance for behaviors perceived as selfish or lacking in public virtue, suggesting a societal expectation for individuals to act responsibly in shared environments [3] - The discussion around these events underscores the need for a legal system that effectively addresses and deters misconduct, ensuring that public spaces remain respectful and orderly for all users [3]