"同一盒药，现金买18元，刷医保卡却要25元"——这样的现象曾让不少患者既困惑又心寒。不久前，国 家医保局发布通知，要求进一步加强监测与处置医保定点零售药店药品"阴阳价格"问题，通过主动筛查 重点药品、深挖线索、调动社会监督，坚决遏制这一损害参保人利益的乱象。 所谓医保药品"阴阳价格"，是指同一药品在销售中对参保与非参保人员实行差别定价，参保患者买药反 而花钱更多。部分药店对此找的借口是因为医保结算周期长、垫付资金压力大，于是悄然把成本转嫁给 参保患者；还有药店以"会员优惠价"之名行差别定价之实，甚至在药品拆零销售、捆绑销售中玩起花 样。这些"套路"不仅蚕食医保基金，更会动摇公众对医保制度的信任。 "阴阳价格"反映出部分经营主体的投机心理。过去，由于信息化程度有限，问题发现难、取证难、处罚 轻。加上一些药品本身的渠道、定价等信息不透明，药店享有更大的主动权，使"阴阳价格"有了生存土 壤。如今国家医保局提出以大数据监测、智能比价系统、异常预警模型等手段强化实时监管，是从"被 动发现"向"主动感知"的转变。让违规行为在露头瞬间被锁定、被惩处，才能确保监管的威慑力。 治理"阴阳价格"还要疏堵并举。从药店角度看，医保 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) has reported 20 smart terminal devices for illegally collecting personal information, highlighting ongoing challenges in personal information protection despite increasing public awareness and legal frameworks [1][2]. Group 1: Current Issues in Personal Information Protection - There is a high incidence of personal information crimes, with over 2,100 cases and more than 4,400 individuals prosecuted for violating personal information rights in the first three quarters of 2025 [1]. - Smart terminal devices have vulnerabilities that are exploited due to manufacturers prioritizing functionality over security, leading to inadequate protection against hacking [1][2]. - Pre-installed, non-removable apps by operators collect data without user consent, turning devices into tools for data theft [1][2]. Group 2: Evolving Nature of Information Crimes - The methods of personal information infringement have evolved into a full-chain model involving "technical attacks + data processing + customized supply," with rapid technological advancements complicating protection efforts [2]. - Hackers utilize advanced techniques such as web crawlers, Trojan viruses, and penetration tools to illegally access personal information [2]. - The black and gray market for personal information is thriving, with criminals using AI technologies to gather and analyze data for downstream criminal activities [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - A multi-faceted defense system combining "technical protection + legal penalties + social governance" is essential for safeguarding personal information in the digital age [3]. - Companies should prioritize security measures over functional innovations, employing privacy algorithms and encrypted storage to ensure data is usable but not visible [3]. - Regulatory bodies need to enhance monitoring capabilities to detect and address risks early, while legal frameworks should be refined to increase penalties for violations [3]. - Public awareness campaigns and self-protection education are crucial for empowering citizens to safeguard their personal information [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the special rectification action taken by the Zhenyuan County Market Supervision Administration to ensure food safety in the meat products industry, focusing on combating the production and sale of counterfeit and inferior meat products, as well as false advertising [1][2]. Group 1: Comprehensive Inspection and Regulation - The county's market supervision bureau has implemented a "full chain inspection + social co-governance" model to effectively block the circulation of problematic products [1]. - A total of 268 meat product production and operation units have been inspected, with 36 batches of products sampled for supervision, leading to the rectification of 36 issues [1]. - The action has resulted in the transfer of one criminal case to the public security authorities and the handling of five administrative cases, effectively disrupting the entire circulation path of counterfeit and inferior meat products [1]. Group 2: Online and Offline Collaborative Supervision - Offline enforcement focuses on urban-rural junctions and rural markets, cracking down on substandard and counterfeit products [1]. - Online supervision includes strict verification of merchant qualifications and product information on platforms, along with enhanced monitoring of "internet celebrity" live-streamed meat products [1]. - Legal penalties are imposed for false advertising and misleading consumer behavior, ensuring consumer rights to information and choice are protected [1]. Group 3: Social Co-Governance and Long-term Regulatory Mechanism - The establishment of a complaint and reporting channel (12315) encourages public supervision and implements a "whistleblower" system to enhance deterrent effects [2]. - The market supervision bureau has issued a notice to strengthen inspection and quarantine of meat products and has conducted concentrated discussions with responsible units in the meat supply chain [2]. - Continuous inspections are planned to ensure compliance with legal obligations, with strict actions against those unable to provide legal documentation or failing to implement purchase verification [2].

Core Points - Suzhou has launched a "100-Day Assurance" special action plan to enhance consumer confidence and safety in the market, focusing on quality, pricing, service, and rights protection [1][2][3] Group 1: Consumer Environment Improvement - The action plan aims to create a trustworthy consumption environment by implementing 12 measures that enhance service quality, optimize market order, improve rights protection efficiency, and foster a collaborative social atmosphere [1] - Key commercial areas in Suzhou will see initiatives to elevate the consumer environment, with a goal to establish a number of "assured consumption" zones across various types of markets and shopping areas [1] - The plan includes a commitment to add 5,000 offline retailers offering a "no-reason return" policy throughout the year [1] Group 2: Quality Regulation and Brand Development - Suzhou will enhance the cultivation and protection of time-honored brands and promote "Jiangsu Quality" and "Suzhou Manufacturing" in categories such as food, home appliances, and daily consumer goods [2] - The initiative emphasizes quality supervision of consumer goods closely related to daily life, particularly focusing on food safety and the safety of pharmaceuticals and cosmetics [2] Group 3: Consumer Order Optimization - The city will implement the "Guarding Consumption" initiative to create a trustworthy and satisfactory consumption ecosystem, promoting a multi-faceted dispute resolution model [3] - A commitment to "one-click resolution" for consumer rights will be promoted, encouraging e-commerce platforms and businesses to adopt online dispute resolution mechanisms [3] - Educational efforts will be made to enhance legal awareness and consumer rights, alongside initiatives to foster industry self-discipline and a culture of honesty in consumption [3]

上个月，与几位许久未见的老友围坐一桌，闲聊中话题悄然滑向了每个人近期的财务状况。曾几何时， 我们月月皆有余钱添置心仪之物，如今却不得不紧捂钱包，精打细算。好友小张一声叹息，道出了许多 人的心声："房贷压力像座大山，加上网购时那股子冲动劲儿，月底总是捉襟见肘。"其余几位朋友也纷 纷颔首，显然感同身受。这一幕，不禁引发了我对一个普遍现象的深思：为何当下许多人倍感消费压 力，究竟是什么将我们推入了这场消费的"寒冬"？经过一番探究，我发现，过重的住房负担与电商消费 模式的异化，是桎梏普通家庭消费能力的两大关键"元凶"。 消费寒冬里的"捂紧钱包"：住房与网购的双重枷锁，如何寻求解困之道？ 住房：吞噬可支配收入的"巨兽" 毋庸置疑，高昂的住房成本已成为家庭收入的"黑洞"。翻阅住房和城乡建设部在2025年3月发布的《中国 城市住房发展报告》，触目惊心的数字摆在眼前：全国一、二线城市家庭，其住房支出（无论是房贷月 供还是房租）平均已占家庭月收入的42%。这一比例，早已远超国际公认的30%的警戒线。这意味着， 城市居民近乎一半的收入，被无情地投入到"安居"这一基本需求中，留给其他消费的可支配收入，自然 被大幅压缩。 我的邻居王 ...

Core Viewpoint - The food industry is undergoing significant transformation driven by new raw materials, technologies, and processes, presenting both opportunities and challenges for food safety management across the entire supply chain [1] Group 1: Industry Innovation - The frequency of new product launches in the food industry has accelerated, with companies introducing new products monthly or even weekly, reflecting a shift towards innovation as a norm [2] - Consumer demand for diverse food options is increasing, with a focus on taste, nutritional content, and health factors, leading to a reshaping of the food supply chain [2] - Companies are responding to market changes by developing new products and exploring new market segments, indicating a shift from capital competition to innovation competition [2] Group 2: Food Safety Challenges - The introduction of new raw materials and products poses new risks for food safety, necessitating updated risk assessment methods [3] - The complexity of modern food safety issues requires the enhancement of national food safety standards, with 126 new standards and amendments released this year to address various safety concerns [3] Group 3: Technological Empowerment - Modern technology is being increasingly utilized to enhance food safety, with companies like COFCO using IoT and big data for predictive analysis in agriculture and smart feeding systems in livestock management [4] - Mengniu has established a comprehensive digital quality management system that allows for rapid traceability of milk products, ensuring transparency from farm to market [4][5] Group 4: Collaborative Governance - Food safety requires collaboration among various stakeholders, including consumers, industry associations, and businesses, to create a robust food safety ecosystem [6] - Platforms like Meituan are investing in centralized kitchens to improve food safety standards for small vendors, enhancing infrastructure and operational transparency [6] Group 5: Supply Chain Cooperation - The establishment of collaborative innovation mechanisms between food safety companies and suppliers is crucial for enhancing food safety levels and ensuring supply chain stability [7] - A digital system for government-business collaboration is recommended to improve targeted risk management and monitoring of food safety [7] Group 6: Community Responsibility - The role of delivery personnel in food safety is emphasized, with initiatives encouraging them to report safety issues, thereby fostering a community-driven approach to food safety [8]

Group 1: Forum Overview - The 16th China Food Safety Forum was held on September 11 in Beijing, focusing on the theme "Upholding Virtue and Law, Sharing Food Safety" [1] - The forum aims to promote high-quality development in China's food industry, gathering government departments, industry experts, research institutions, and corporate representatives [1] Group 2: Government and Media Roles - The Director of the Food Coordination Department of the State Administration for Market Regulation emphasized the need for social participation in food safety governance and the importance of technological innovation [2] - The Deputy Editor-in-Chief of Economic Daily highlighted the media's role in enhancing public confidence and promoting transparency in food safety information [2] Group 3: Technological Empowerment - The Dean of the Institute of Nutrition and Health at China Agricultural University proposed three suggestions for food safety governance: leveraging technology, solidifying industry responsibility, and promoting shared governance [4] - As of now, China has released 1,725 national food safety standards covering over 340 food categories, with 126 new standards published this year [4] Group 4: Industry Practices - Mengniu Group has implemented big data, AI, and IoT technologies to enhance its entire supply chain's digital transformation [5] - Meituan emphasized its commitment to food safety through data mining and AI algorithms, focusing on transparency and collaborative governance [5] Group 5: Waste Reduction Initiatives - The "Stop Food Waste" initiative launched by China Economic Net aims to promote the traditional virtue of frugality and has organized multiple volunteer activities [6] - KFC has established food stations to provide surplus food to those in need, covering over 180 cities and approximately 1,050 stores by June 2025 [6] Group 6: Internal Motivation and Responsibility - Discussions highlighted that the core of food safety's internal motivation lies in the social responsibility of food enterprises [7] - Ferrero China has initiated a zero-risk food safety management strategy, focusing on risk prevention and collaborative management across the supply chain [7] Group 7: Future Outlook - The overall food safety situation in China is improving, with a more comprehensive standard system and accelerated smart regulation [8] - The focus remains on ensuring safe and healthy food consumption, driven by virtue, technology, and multi-party collaboration [8]

Core Viewpoint - The 16th China Food Safety Forum emphasizes the importance of collaborative governance and technological innovation in ensuring food safety amidst rapid industry changes [2][4]. Group 1: Food Safety Governance - The government is urged to strictly implement the "four strictest" requirements and enhance comprehensive supervision from production to consumption to ensure food safety [3]. - Food production and operation enterprises must strengthen their responsibility awareness, establish risk management systems, and ensure the provision of safe food [3]. - Industry associations are encouraged to play a bridging role, promoting self-discipline and industry integrity to foster healthy development within the food sector [3]. Group 2: Technological Innovation - There is a call for increased investment in food safety technology research and development, promoting collaboration between industry, academia, and research institutions [3]. - The implementation of smart regulatory measures, such as "Internet + Bright Kitchen" and AI + big data risk warning systems, is essential for enhancing food safety monitoring [3][4]. - The goal is to achieve early detection and resolution of risks through advanced technology and equipment [3]. Group 3: Social Participation - The forum advocates for the establishment of platforms for public participation in food safety oversight, encouraging consumer involvement in monitoring [4]. - Industry associations should facilitate resource sharing and professional training to enhance industry self-regulation [4]. - There is a need for effective communication strategies to raise public awareness about food safety, including media's role in reporting both violations and positive examples [4][5].

Core Viewpoint - The 16th China Food Safety Forum emphasizes the importance of food safety as a critical aspect of social governance and highlights the role of media in promoting food safety awareness and practices [2][3]. Group 1: Importance of Food Safety - Food safety is a fundamental issue for the public, serving as a key indicator of social governance capabilities [3]. - Since the 18th National Congress, the Chinese government has significantly increased its focus on food safety, implementing stringent legal frameworks and policies [3]. Group 2: Role of Media in Food Safety - Media plays a crucial role in enhancing public confidence by providing positive coverage of food safety improvements and the public's sense of security [3][4]. - The media is tasked with fostering social consensus by promoting traditional virtues of thrift and integrity while improving public knowledge of food safety [4]. - Media should leverage its professional advantages to ensure timely and authoritative reporting, enhancing transparency and promoting self-regulation within the industry [4][5]. Group 3: Ongoing Initiatives - The Economic Daily and China Economic Net have been actively involved in food safety initiatives, hosting the National Food Safety Publicity Week and the China Food Safety Forum for several years [5]. - The organizations aim to innovate reporting methods and serve as a bridge between the government, enterprises, and the public to foster a collaborative environment for food safety [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant advancements in China's advertising industry over the past decade, particularly following the implementation of the revised Advertising Law in 2015, which has led to a more regulated and competitive market environment [2]. Group 1: Strengthening of Advertising Guidance Regulation - The 2015 Advertising Law expanded the scope of advertising publishers to include individuals, significantly increasing the number of advertising participants and fostering a highly competitive market [3][4]. - The emphasis on advertising guidance regulation has become a top priority for market supervision, promoting positive cultural values and narratives [4]. Group 2: Shift in Regulatory Focus to Internet Media - By 2016, internet advertising accounted for over 50% of the total advertising revenue in China, with projections indicating that by 2024, internet advertising revenue will reach 8,919.1 billion yuan, representing 86.5% of total advertising revenue [6]. - In 2024, market regulators handled approximately 46,900 cases of illegal advertising, with over 30,000 cases related to internet advertising, highlighting the shift in regulatory focus [6]. Group 3: Transition to Intelligent Regulatory Models - The rapid growth of internet advertising necessitated a shift from traditional regulatory methods to technology-driven monitoring systems, leading to the establishment of national internet advertising monitoring centers [8]. - The implementation of intelligent monitoring has significantly improved regulatory efficiency and effectiveness in curbing illegal advertising [8]. Group 4: Shift from Pre-emptive to Post-Event Regulation - The regulatory approach has evolved from a focus on pre-approval processes to a system that emphasizes post-event monitoring, with the number of required approvals significantly reduced since 1994 [10]. - This shift allows for more efficient oversight of advertising practices, focusing on compliance after advertisements are published [10]. Group 5: Systematic and Regularized Enforcement - Since the implementation of the 2015 Advertising Law, advertising monitoring has become a systematic and regularized process, with a focus on key areas such as healthcare and consumer goods [12]. - Continuous enforcement efforts have effectively reduced the prevalence of false and misleading advertisements [12]. Group 6: Collaborative Regulatory Efforts - The complexity of the advertising landscape has necessitated a collaborative approach to regulation, involving multiple government agencies and industry stakeholders [15]. - The establishment of a social supervision system aims to enhance compliance and promote a healthy advertising market [15]. Group 7: Emerging Challenges - The article identifies three key challenges in advertising regulation: the blurring lines between commercial advertising and non-advertising promotions, the lack of regulatory frameworks for new consumer products, and outdated enforcement measures for online advertising [15].