Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal complexities surrounding the responsibility for unpaid property management fees when purchasing judicial auction properties, emphasizing the need for buyers to be aware of potential liabilities associated with such transactions [1][4]. Group 1: Case Summary - In June 2022, a buyer named Wang acquired a property through judicial auction, only to discover that the previous owner, Zhou, owed over 21,000 yuan in property management fees [2]. - The property management company demanded payment from both Zhou and Wang, citing a clause in the auction announcement that stated the buyer would be responsible for any outstanding fees during the transfer process [2][3]. - The court ruled that Zhou was responsible for fees incurred before the property transfer, while Wang was liable for fees incurred after the transfer, leading to a judgment that required Zhou to pay 13,076.57 yuan in property service fees and Wang to pay 1,538.42 yuan for the period following the transfer [3]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The case underscores the principle of contractual obligations, where the original owner remains liable for debts incurred prior to the transfer of ownership, despite the auction process [3]. - The court's decision reflects a balance between the rights of the new owner and the obligations of the previous owner, reinforcing the notion that auction buyers should conduct thorough due diligence before participating in such transactions [4]. - The increasing popularity of judicial auction properties comes with inherent risks, including potential unpaid fees and existing liabilities, which buyers must consider carefully [4].

深圳1.14亿天价法拍房成交后竟遭悔拍？近日，深圳一宗法拍房交易引发广泛关注。 今年5月14日，位于深圳市罗湖区红岭中路的一栋6层办公老楼在阿里拍卖平台上，经过34名竞拍者450 轮激烈竞价，最终以1.14亿元的高价成交，溢价率高达379.6%。 然而，一个多月后的6月23日，拍卖网页更新显示该标的物交易未履行，这意味着买受人悔拍。按照规 定，买受人交纳的475万元保证金或将不予退还。南都·湾财社记者注意到，该标的物已重新上架，将于 7月24日再次拍卖。 而从房地产估计报告中可以看到，本次标的物产权是属于深圳市建设（集团）有限公司。另外在竞买公 告中提到，根据现场调查，标的物实际门牌号为红岭中路2116号，地图显示，该地址正是建设集团大厦 所在范围。 天眼查显示，深圳市建设 (集团) 有限公司成立于2003年，深圳市特区建工集团成员，是一家以从事房 地产业为主的企业，企业注册资本6.2亿元人民币。该公司由深圳市特区建工集团有限公司持股83%， 深圳市建筑工程股份有限公司持股12%，恒大地产集团有限公司持股5%。截至目前，该公司共有6条被 执行人信息，被执行总金额为约7.07亿元。 值得一提的是，从不动产登记信 ...

Group 1 - The core idea is that in online court auctions, a property can be purchased even if only one bidder participates, as long as the bid meets or exceeds the starting price [1][3] - The court's goal in conducting online auctions is to sell properties to help creditors recover their funds, establishing clear rules for the auction process [3] Group 2 - Certain properties may attract fewer bidders due to specific issues, such as poor condition, inconvenient location, or complicated ownership, presenting potential opportunities for buyers willing to invest time and effort [5] - Properties with legal complications, such as unclear ownership or outstanding fees, may deter buyers but can lead to lower prices for those who are patient and resourceful [5] Group 3 - Bidders are advised to focus on second auctions, which typically offer greater discounts, with the second auction often starting at 56% of the assessed value if the first auction fails to attract buyers [7] - It is important for bidders to understand the auction rules, particularly regarding time extensions when bids are placed in the final minutes, allowing for strategic bidding [8] Group 4 - Potential risks include ownership disputes, outstanding fees, and property condition, which must be thoroughly investigated before participating in an auction to avoid future complications [10] - The article emphasizes the importance of understanding risks and conducting due diligence to ensure a successful purchase at a reasonable price [12]