来源：北京日报 美国会众议院"中国特设委"抹黑中美正常教育交流合作，外交部驳斥 10月9日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。 郭嘉昆说："我们敦促美方将特朗普总统'欢迎中国留学生赴美学习'的表态落到实处， 停止损害相关方的利益和中美关系。中方将密切关注美方言行，采取必要措施坚决捍 卫中方合法权益。 涉 嫌 严 重 违 纪 违 法，乌 兰 被 查 有记者提问，据报道，美国国会众议院"中国特设委"近期出台所谓"签证政策如何导致 中国国防机构利用美高等教育"的调查报告，抹黑并建议限制中美正常教育交流合作。 发言人对此有何评论？ 郭嘉昆表示，你提到的机构一贯出于政治目的攻击抹黑中国，毫无信誉可言。 针对其 恶劣行径，中方已向美方提出严正交涉。 "我们要强调的是，中美教育交流合作是互利共赢的，符合双方共同利益和期待，有助 于增进两国人民的交往与了解。"郭嘉昆表示，个别美国政客泛化国家安全概念，干扰 破坏中美教育和人文领域正常的交往合作，不得人心，注定失败。 ...

10月9日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。 问：据报道，美国国会众议院"中国特设委"近期出台所谓"签证政策如何导致中国国防机构利用美高等 教育"的调查报告，抹黑并建议限制中美正常教育交流合作。发言人对此有何评论？ 我们要强调的是，中美教育交流合作是互利共赢的，符合双方共同利益和期待，有助于增进两国人民的 交往与了解。个别美国政客泛化国家安全概念，干扰破坏中美教育和人文领域正常交往合作，不得人 心，注定失败。我们敦促美方将特朗普总统欢迎中国留学生赴美学习的表态落到实处，停止损害相关方 利益和中美关系。中方将密切关注美方言行，采取必要措施，坚决捍卫中方合法权益。 答：你提到的这个机构一贯出于政治目的攻击抹黑中国，毫无信誉可言。针对其恶劣行径，中方已向美 方提出严正交涉。 ...

Group 1 - Australian Prime Minister Albanese is set to visit China from July 12 to 18, aiming to strengthen bilateral relations with Australia's largest trading partner [1][3] - The visit will include a 14-member business delegation from major companies such as Macquarie Group and Rio Tinto, indicating a focus on expanding economic ties [3] - China is willing to enhance cooperation in traditional sectors like agriculture and mining, while also exploring new areas such as AI, healthcare, and green energy [3] Group 2 - German Chancellor Merz is also planning a visit to China later this year, accompanied by a delegation of top corporate executives, to stabilize relations with China amid rising tensions [5] - The German government aims to deepen economic cooperation with China to mitigate the negative impacts of the trade tensions initiated by the Trump administration [5] - The U.S. government plans to prohibit foreign entities, including Chinese investors, from purchasing American farmland, citing national security concerns [5][7]

Group 1 - The Canadian government has ordered Hikvision to cease operations in Canada within 120 days, citing national security concerns without providing specific evidence of threats [2] - The Canadian government has also prohibited all government departments and state-owned enterprises from procuring or using Hikvision products, and will review existing assets to ensure no Hikvision products remain in use [2] - Hikvision's Canadian operations represent less than 0.3% of the company's total revenue for 2024, and the company plans to continue serving its global customers despite political pressures [3] Group 2 - The Chinese embassy in Canada condemned the Canadian government's actions as damaging to the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises and as a political maneuver abusing national security concepts [3] - Hikvision's spokesperson criticized the Canadian government's decision as lacking factual basis and transparency, asserting that the decision is discriminatory based on the company's country of origin rather than a technical assessment [3] - The U.S. has previously blacklisted Hikvision in 2019 and banned it from selling equipment in the U.S. without authorization in 2022, citing unacceptable risks to national security [2]

Group 1 - Canada has ordered Hikvision to cease operations in the country, citing "national security" concerns, which reflects a broader geopolitical tension and bias against Chinese companies [1] - The Canadian Minister of Industry, François-Philippe Champagne, stated that the decision was made after a multi-step review by Canadian security and intelligence agencies [1] - Hikvision's spokesperson expressed strong opposition to the decision, arguing that it lacks factual basis, procedural fairness, and transparency, and is influenced by the company's country of origin rather than its technology standards [1] Group 2 - The Chinese Embassy in Canada condemned the move, asserting that it undermines the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises and disrupts normal economic and trade cooperation between China and Canada [1] - The situation highlights ongoing challenges in China-Canada relations, indicating that despite changes in leadership, Canada continues to struggle with a fair approach towards Chinese companies [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Canadian government has ordered Hikvision Canada to cease operations in Canada under the pretext of "national security," which China strongly opposes, claiming it harms the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises and disrupts normal Sino-Canadian economic cooperation [1] Group 1 - The Chinese government expresses strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to Canada's actions against Hikvision Canada, viewing it as an unjustified attack on Chinese companies [1] - China emphasizes its support for Chinese enterprises to engage in foreign investment and cooperation based on market principles and international rules, while adhering to local laws [1] - The Chinese side urges Canada to stop politicizing economic issues and to provide a fair, just, and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies to operate [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns that it will take all necessary measures to firmly protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises in response to Canada's actions [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for aligning with the U.S., stating that such actions will harm Taiwan and lead to its destruction [1] Group 1 - The DPP has placed Huawei and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) on Taiwan's "entity list" under U.S. pressure [1] - The Chinese government opposes the politicization of technology and trade issues by the U.S., as well as the broadening of national security concepts [1] - The Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasizes that the DPP's actions of "kneeling to the U.S." and "flattering the U.S." will only be detrimental to Taiwan [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. has suspended the sale of engine technology to China, which is perceived as a malicious blockade and suppression against China by the U.S. government, reflecting a broadening interpretation of national security concerns [1] Group 1 - The U.S. action is characterized as an expansion of the national security concept, indicating a shift in policy that may affect international trade and technology transfer [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry has condemned the U.S. decision, labeling it as an attempt to impose restrictions and exert pressure on China [1] - This development may have implications for the aerospace and defense industries, particularly in the context of U.S.-China relations and technology competition [1]

Group 1 - The Chinese government opposes the broadening of national security concepts and the politicization of economic and technological issues [1] - The Chinese government will firmly protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises [1]