泛化国家安全概念
Search documents
安世中国区被荷兰总部抛弃:员工断薪、权限中断,安世中国回应
Zhong Guo Ji Jin Bao· 2025-10-19 07:09
Core Viewpoint - Anshi Semiconductor China emphasizes its commitment to operating independently within China while adhering to local laws and regulations, amidst external pressures and geopolitical tensions [4][5][6]. Group 1: Company Operations - Anshi Semiconductor China asserts that it is an independent Chinese enterprise with the authority to make its own operational decisions, and all employees are required to follow company directives [4]. - The company confirms that all operations, employee salaries, and benefits are functioning normally, and it will not allow external forces to disrupt its operations or harm employee interests [4][5]. - Anshi Semiconductor China expresses gratitude to its employees for their contributions and encourages them to maintain a unified front during challenging times [5]. Group 2: External Pressures - On October 12, it was reported that Anshi Semiconductor and its subsidiaries received a directive from the Dutch government, freezing their global operations for one year under the pretext of national security [6][7]. - The parent company, Wentai Technology, strongly protests against the Dutch government's actions, labeling them as discriminatory and politically motivated, and has initiated legal and diplomatic measures to challenge the directive [6][7]. - The Chinese government and industry associations have voiced their opposition to the Dutch actions, emphasizing the need to uphold market principles and avoid politicizing economic issues [7][8]. Group 3: Employee Communication - On October 17, reports emerged that Anshi Semiconductor's Chinese employees received notifications regarding potential disruptions in salary payments and system access, prompting the company to take independent measures to secure its domestic supply chain [8]. - The company reassures employees that their labor relations remain intact and that salaries and benefits will continue to be managed by the domestic entity rather than the Dutch parent company [4][5].
荷兰干预安世半导体运营,中方回应
财联社· 2025-10-17 07:44
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government opposes the broadening of national security concepts and discriminatory practices against specific national enterprises, emphasizing the need to uphold contractual spirit and market principles while maintaining global supply chains [1] Group 1 - The Dutch government's control over Nexperia is warned by European and American automotive associations as a potential cause for supply chain disruptions [1] - The Chinese government has reiterated its stance against actions that undermine global production capacity and has committed to safeguarding its legitimate rights and interests [1]
中方是否正与荷方就其接管安世半导体问题进行磋商?外交部回应
Huan Qiu Wang· 2025-10-17 07:44
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government opposes the broadening of national security concepts and discriminatory practices against specific national enterprises, emphasizing the need to maintain global supply chains and market principles [1] Group 1 - The Dutch government's takeover of ASML has raised concerns about potential supply chain disruptions, as warned by European and American automotive associations [1] - The Chinese government is engaged in discussions with the Netherlands to address the issue of the takeover and its implications for supply chains [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government calls for correction of erroneous practices by relevant countries and stresses the importance of upholding contractual spirit and market principles [1] - China reaffirms its commitment to safeguarding its legitimate rights and interests in the face of international challenges [1]
中方已禁止安世半导体从中国出口产品?外交部回应
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-10-15 12:08
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government opposes the politicization of trade issues and discriminatory practices against specific national enterprises, emphasizing its commitment to safeguarding its legitimate rights and interests [1]. Company Summary - Nexperia, a semiconductor manufacturer headquartered in Nijmegen, Netherlands, is a core semiconductor business of Wingtech Technology, focusing on discrete and logic devices [1]. - Nexperia was established as an independent entity in 2017, previously a department of NXP Semiconductors, and was fully acquired by Wingtech Technology in 2019, now operating as a wholly-owned subsidiary [1]. - In 2024, Nexperia is projected to generate approximately 14.7 billion yuan in revenue, accounting for about one-sixth of Wingtech Technology's total revenue for that year [1]. Industry Summary - Wingtech Technology has publicly condemned the Dutch government's decision to freeze Nexperia's global operations under the pretext of "national security," labeling it as excessive intervention based on geopolitical bias rather than factual risk assessment [1]. - This action is seen as a serious violation of the principles of market economy, fair competition, and international trade rules that the European Union advocates [1].
中国半导体行业协会声援闻泰科技维权 反对滥用“国家安全”概念
Zheng Quan Shi Bao Wang· 2025-10-14 04:25
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese semiconductor industry association expresses strong support for its member company, Wintech Technology, in response to the Dutch government's intervention with its subsidiary, Nexperia, and opposes discriminatory measures against specific enterprises [1][2][4]. Group 1: Company Response - Wintech Technology's stock experienced a significant decline, hitting the limit down on October 13 and again on October 14, closing at 37.65 yuan per share [2]. - The company announced that Nexperia is still operating normally but faces challenges such as changes in decision-making processes and reduced resource flexibility due to the Dutch government's orders [5][6]. - Wintech is actively communicating with suppliers and customers to maintain stability in its workforce, production, and sales channels, while also exploring legal remedies to protect its rights [6]. Group 2: Industry Reaction - The Chinese semiconductor industry association emphasizes the need for a fair and non-discriminatory business environment and expresses serious concern over the intervention in Nexperia's operations [2][4]. - The association firmly opposes the misuse of "national security" concepts to impose selective restrictions on Chinese enterprises operating abroad [3][4]. - The association plans to continue monitoring the situation and will communicate the industry's collective concerns to the international community through legal channels [4].
荷兰政府对闻泰科技子公司安世半导体下手,外交部回应
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-10-13 09:02
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government opposes the politicization of trade issues and discriminatory practices against specific national enterprises, emphasizing the importance of adhering to market principles [1] Group 1 - The Dutch government plans to impose restrictions on China's Wingtech Technology's subsidiary, Nexperia [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Lin Jian, highlighted the need for countries to respect market principles and avoid politicizing economic and trade matters [1] - China remains steadfast in protecting its legitimate rights and interests [1]
荷兰政府将会对闻泰科技旗下安世半导体采取限制措施,外交部:中方一贯反对泛化“国家安全”概念,针对特定国家企业采取歧视性做法
Ge Long Hui· 2025-10-13 08:59
【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点,与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立,不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考,并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱: news_center@staff.hexun.com 格隆汇10月13日|外交部发言人林剑主持10月13日例行记者会。会上彭博社记者提问称:荷兰政府将会 对闻泰科技旗下安世半导体采取限制措施。中方对此有何评论?林剑对此表示,你提到的具体问题建议 向中方的主管部门了解。我要指出的是,中方一贯反对泛化"国家安全"概念,针对特定国家企业采取歧 视性做法,有关国家应切实遵守市场原则,不要将经贸问题政治化,中方维护自身正当合法权益的决心 坚定不移。 (责任编辑:宋政 HN002) ...
荷兰将会对闻泰科技子公司采取限制措施 中方:反对泛化国家安全概念
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-10-13 08:16
Core Viewpoint - The Dutch government plans to impose restrictions on the Chinese company Wingtech Technology's subsidiary, Nexperia, which has drawn a response from China opposing the broadening of national security concepts [1]. Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian emphasized that China consistently opposes the discriminatory practices targeting specific national enterprises under the guise of national security [1]. - Lin Jian urged relevant countries to adhere to market principles and avoid politicizing economic and trade issues [1]. - The Chinese government remains resolute in safeguarding its legitimate rights and interests [1].
中方:已向美方提出严正交涉
中国基金报· 2025-10-09 13:08
Group 1 - The U.S. House of Representatives' "China Special Committee" has issued a report suggesting that visa policies lead to the utilization of U.S. higher education by Chinese defense institutions, which is seen as an attempt to undermine normal educational exchanges between China and the U.S. [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson emphasized that educational exchanges between China and the U.S. are mutually beneficial and serve the common interests of both countries, enhancing understanding between their peoples [1] - The spokesperson criticized certain U.S. politicians for broadening the concept of national security, which disrupts normal educational and cultural exchanges, and stated that such actions are destined to fail [1]
外交部:个别政客破坏中美交往合作注定失败
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-10-09 08:23
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government criticizes the U.S. House of Representatives' "China Special Committee" for its report on visa policies, claiming it undermines normal educational exchanges between the U.S. and China, which are mutually beneficial [1] Group 1: U.S.-China Educational Exchange - The Chinese government emphasizes that educational exchanges between the U.S. and China are beneficial for both parties and help enhance mutual understanding [1] - The report from the U.S. committee is seen as politically motivated and lacking credibility, aimed at damaging the educational cooperation between the two countries [1] Group 2: Response to U.S. Actions - The Chinese government has lodged formal protests against the U.S. for its actions that interfere with educational and cultural exchanges [1] - There is a call for the U.S. to honor previous statements made by former President Trump regarding welcoming Chinese students to study in the U.S. [1] - The Chinese government warns that the actions of certain U.S. politicians, which generalize national security concerns, are unpopular and destined to fail [1]