Workflow
涉企执法监督
icon
Search documents
来自监督一线的报道丨从“多头查”到“一次查”
深圳强化涉企执法问题整治 从"多头查"到"一次查" 有了这个系统,早在一周前,李国坡便收到这次行政检查预告,并反馈了想要获取的指导服务。此外, 他还可以查询执法记录、对执法行为进行评价投诉。对执法部门来说,在发布行政检查计划的同时,也 能查看其他部门的检查计划,有利于实现部门间联合检查。 中央纪委国家监委网站 侯颗 自广东深圳报道 位于广东省深圳市宝安区的高新奇战略新兴产业园区聚集着信息技术、生物医药等120余家科技型企 业。近日,产业园区管理有限公司副总经理李国坡迎来一次执法检查。与以往不同的是,执法人员需要 先扫一扫摆在李国坡面前的"行政执法监督码",才能入企开展检查。 当天上午,近两个小时的时间,宝安区的市场监管、应急、消防、水务、生态环境等部门组成四个检查 组和一个合规指导组,同步对产业园区安全管理运行情况开展检查指导,所有部门的检查结果集中在一 张单子上反馈给李国坡。 "以前各单位分头来,现在一次完成多部门多条线的检查任务,相比过去合并了不少检查事项。"李国坡 说,检查结果"一单告知"也更加便捷高效,避免不同部门对同一事项整改要求不一致的情况出现。 通过一个小小的执法监督码,"进一次门、查多项事"将 ...
市场监管、公安部门行政争议高发,司法部发布行政复议白皮书
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-01 15:17
Core Insights - The Ministry of Justice released the "Administrative Review Work White Paper (2024)", highlighting significant trends in administrative disputes and resolutions in China [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Review Statistics - The number of new administrative review cases received by various levels of administrative review agencies reached 749,600 in 2024, a year-on-year increase of 94.7%, which is 2.5 times the number of first-instance administrative cases in courts [2] - The total number of concluded administrative review cases was 641,000, reflecting an 82.1% year-on-year growth [2] - Administrative review cases are predominantly concentrated in economically developed provinces, with 17 provinces receiving over 10,000 cases, accounting for more than 83.2% of the total [2] Group 2: Areas of High Administrative Disputes - The most frequent areas of administrative disputes are market regulation and public security, with the top five categories of cases being: market regulation (163,000 cases, 29.5%), public security (125,000 cases, 22.6%), natural resources (39,000 cases, 7.1%), human resources and social security (27,000 cases, 4.9%), and financial supervision (26,000 cases, 4.7%) [3][4] - In terms of administrative behavior, the most common cases involve complaint handling (161,000 cases, 29.2%), administrative penalties (130,000 cases, 23.5%), government information disclosure (105,000 cases, 19.1%), administrative inaction (48,000 cases, 8.7%), and administrative confirmation (22,000 cases, 4.0%) [3] Group 3: Resolution and Correction Rates - The direct correction rate for administrative reviews was reported at 12.1%, with 58,000 cases corrected through various means such as changes, cancellations, and confirmations of illegality [6] - A total of 168,000 cases were resolved through mediation and reconciliation, achieving a settlement rate of 26.3% [4] - After administrative review, 90.3% of cases did not proceed to litigation or petition processes, with a year-on-year increase of 13.5 percentage points in case resolution rates [4] Group 4: Focus on Enterprise-related Law Enforcement - Administrative review agencies have intensified efforts to supervise unlawful and improper law enforcement actions affecting enterprises, correcting over 6,500 such cases [5] - Specific instances include the correction of wrongful administrative penalties that saved enterprises over 10 million yuan [5] - The white paper emphasizes the importance of maintaining consistency in legal policies to support the construction of a unified market [5]
去年全国各级行政复议机关办结行政复议案件64.1万件
Xin Hua She· 2025-07-01 12:55
Core Insights - The number of new administrative review cases received by administrative review agencies across the country reached 749,600 in 2024, representing a year-on-year increase of 94.7% [1] - A total of 641,000 administrative review cases were concluded, marking an 82.1% year-on-year growth [1] - 90.3% of cases that underwent administrative review did not proceed to litigation or petition processes [1] Group 1: Administrative Review Performance - Administrative review agencies effectively resolved disputes through mediation and reconciliation, concluding 168,000 cases via these methods, with a settlement rate of 26.3% [1] - 44,000 administrative disputes were resolved through self-correction by law enforcement agencies, achieving early detection and resolution [1] - Administrative review agencies corrected 58,000 unlawful or improper administrative actions, with a direct correction rate of 12.1% [1] Group 2: Supervision of Administrative Law Enforcement - Administrative review agencies intensified supervision of unlawful and improper law enforcement actions affecting enterprises, correcting over 6,500 such cases [2] - The issuance of administrative review opinions and recommendations helped address common issues in enterprise-related law enforcement [2] - Collaborative efforts with business associations and chambers of commerce facilitated the mediation and resolution of 19,000 cases, providing significant relief to enterprises [2]
在创新中狠抓落实 | 跟进监督助企安心发展
Group 1 - The construction of the residential project in Cixian County is progressing smoothly, attributed to improved regulatory practices and oversight from local authorities [1] - The Cixian Discipline Inspection Commission has initiated a concentrated rectification of prominent issues in enterprise-related law enforcement, addressing complaints from businesses about regulatory practices that hinder normal operations [1][2] - A mechanism for rapid investigation and strict enforcement has been established to combat illegal practices such as arbitrary fees, fines, and inspections that damage the business environment [1][2] Group 2 - High Jun, a former official, was investigated for exploiting his position to impose excessive charges on construction sites, leading to significant disciplinary actions against multiple officials [2] - The "E-Qi Lian Dong" supervision platform has been implemented to enhance oversight of enterprise-related law enforcement, covering 24 administrative law enforcement departments and over 300 enterprises [2][3] - The platform allows for real-time tracking of inspections and enables businesses to report and evaluate law enforcement actions, which will influence annual assessments of enforcement units [3] Group 3 - The positive impact of the regulatory improvements is evident in the operations of companies like Handan Jianxu New Energy Co., which reported efficient inspections and support from regulatory bodies, fostering a conducive business environment [3]