此前，天门市纪委监委收到信访举报，反映刘某某在为群众办理低保过程中索要好处费。该市纪委监委 随即将该信访举报转至汪场镇纪委。该镇纪委成立调查组，通过查阅资料、走访调查等方式收集详实证 据，确认反映问题不属实。为及时消除不实举报对刘某某造成的不良影响，该镇纪委依据有关规定公开 反馈调查结果，为刘某某澄清正名。 中央纪委国家监委网站 曹欢欢 通讯员 罗一波 近日，湖北省天门市汪场镇召开党员群众代表大会，为赖场村党支部书记刘某某澄清正名，会后刘某某 说："感谢组织及时为我澄清正名，让我今后开展工作更有底气。" 聚焦做好澄清正名"后半篇文章"，全省各级纪检监察机关会同组织部门开展暖心回访，对工作业绩突出 的受诬告干部，及时向组织部门、所在单位党组织抄送廉情快报，推荐大胆使用。 阳新县纪委监委将澄清材料存入被反映人廉政档案，并通报组织、人社部门，切实维护党员干部在考核 考察、选拔任用、评先评优等工作中的正当权益，持续巩固提升澄清工作质效，切实保护干部干事创业 的积极性。 诬告陷害行为不仅干扰信访举报秩序，污染社会风气，更严重挫伤党员干部干事创业积极性。湖北省各 级纪检监察机关在为干事者撑腰的同时，坚持将澄清正名与查处诬 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report highlights seven typical cases of false accusations and clarifications in Xianning City, Hubei Province, emphasizing the need to combat such behaviors to maintain a healthy political environment and encourage the proactive engagement of party members and officials [1][10]. Group 1: Cases of False Accusations - Case 1: A civil servant from the Human Resources Bureau in Jiayu County, Deng, fabricated over 30 anonymous reports accusing 22 party leaders of corruption and misconduct, leading to his criminal detention in November 2024 [1]. - Case 2: A villager from Leiluo Village, Wang, falsely accused a former director of the local Natural Resources and Planning Bureau of misconduct after a personal dispute, resulting in an administrative fine in August 2025 [2][3]. - Case 3: A resident from Yong'an Street, Wang, made false claims against a high school party secretary, which were found to be untrue, leading to a reprimand in August 2025 [4]. Group 2: Clarifications of False Reports - Case 4: A public accusation against the chief prosecutor of the Chongyang County People's Procuratorate, Chen, was found to be baseless, and a clarification was issued in March 2025 [5]. - Case 5: A report claiming that the Party Secretary of Nanlinqiao Town, Zeng, misappropriated compensation funds for a solar project was also proven false, with a clarification made in August 2025 [6][7]. - Case 6: An anonymous report against the community party secretary, Ge, regarding election manipulation was determined to be unfounded, with a clarification issued in June 2025 [8]. - Case 7: A report against the deputy secretary of the Party branch in Nanhong Village, Zheng, concerning unauthorized changes to a demolition plan was found to be untrue, leading to a clarification in July 2025 [9][10].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the integration of education, management, supervision, and care for individuals who have received disciplinary actions, aiming to create a supportive environment for their rehabilitation and reintegration into productive roles [3][12] - The Shaanxi Provincial Discipline Inspection and Supervision Agency focuses on the dual role of discipline as both a constraint and an incentive, promoting a culture of compliance and integrity among party members [4][12] - The approach includes regular disciplinary education, utilizing real cases to enhance awareness and understanding of party regulations among members [5][6][8] Group 2 - The mechanism for disciplinary education is designed to be continuous and effective, targeting different groups within the party to ensure that the principles of discipline are internalized and acted upon [6][7] - The emphasis is placed on the importance of strict enforcement of discipline, with measures in place to ensure that disciplinary actions are executed properly and consistently across various levels of governance [9][10][11] - The strategy includes a combination of strict management and encouragement for accountability, aiming to foster a proactive attitude among party members while maintaining high standards of discipline [12][13] Group 3 - The initiative to clarify and rectify misunderstandings regarding disciplinary actions is highlighted, showcasing the importance of transparency and support in the rehabilitation process for affected individuals [14] - The focus on case studies and real-life examples serves as a powerful tool for educating party members about the consequences of violations and the importance of adhering to party discipline [8][9] - The overall goal is to create a balanced environment where discipline and support coexist, enabling party members to learn from their mistakes and contribute positively to the organization [12][13]

2025年2月，一篇反映海陵区城中街道某工作人员贪污受贿的帖文在当地某知名论坛多次出现，并在网 络上持续发酵。得知这一情况后，该区纪委监委迅速介入，赴当事人所在单位，对工作台账、财务账册 等资料进行核查，并与当事人"面对面"沟通交流，调查发现事实与网帖反映不符，其后当事人选择报 警。随即，公安机关找到发帖人翟某，经谈话教育，翟某很快承认所发帖文均属捏造，系其为博取眼 球、赚取流量而发布。 真相查清后，公安机关随即依法对翟某给予治安处罚。与此同时，该区纪委监委迅速还原事实真相，开 展澄清正名工作，组织人员与当事人展开深入对话，开展情绪疏导，引导其卸下"思想包袱"，继续投身 干事创业的热潮中。 以上是该区纪委监委常态化开展澄清正名和打击诬告陷害工作的一个缩影。基层干部身处群众工作的第 一线、服务群众的最前沿，每天需要面对、解决群众各式各样的矛盾与诉求，如果一些失实举报乃至陷 害诬告不能及时调查清楚，不仅会影响基层干部的个人心理和生活，让其"寒心""泄气"，更会影响党群 关系、干群关系。 对此，该区纪委监委秉持"为干事者撑腰，向诬告者亮剑"理念，积极构建"3+3"惩治诬告陷害联动处置 机制，通过联合公安、信访等部门 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for strict management and supervision while encouraging accountability among party members and cadres, aiming to create a supportive environment for proactive work and innovation [1] - The establishment of various institutional mechanisms, such as the "Measures for Encouraging New Responsibilities and Actions of Cadres" and the "Methods for Clarifying Names of Cadres Wronged by False Accusations," aims to enhance collaboration and effectively address false accusations [2] - A professional evaluation team has been formed to assess the validity of complaints, ensuring a systematic and standardized approach to clarifying names and addressing false accusations [2] Group 2 - The approach to handling false accusations is grounded in a principle of objectivity and fairness, focusing on education and rehabilitation of cadres while distinguishing between intentional misconduct and genuine mistakes [3] - The organization emphasizes the importance of thorough analysis and understanding of the context surrounding accusations, ensuring that the process of clarifying names is compassionate and supportive [4] - A proactive stance is taken against malicious reporting, with mechanisms in place to identify and address false accusations early, thereby fostering a culture of integrity and accountability [5] Group 3 - The organization has actively engaged in publicizing cases of name clarification and false accusations to promote transparency and encourage proper channels for reporting [5] - Continuous follow-up and support for cadres who have faced disciplinary actions are prioritized to help them reintegrate and contribute positively to their roles [5]