Core Insights - The articles focus on advancements in Reinforcement Learning (RL) and its application to Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, highlighting significant improvements in generalization capabilities and training efficiency. Group 1: Research Findings - The first study investigates how RL enhances the generalization ability of VLA models, addressing issues related to supervised fine-tuning (SFT) that lead to error accumulation and distribution shift. A new benchmark covering visual, semantic, and execution dimensions was established, showing that using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) for RL fine-tuning significantly improves semantic understanding and execution robustness while maintaining comparable visual generalization performance to SFT [2]. - The second study introduces RLinf-VLA, a framework designed for large-scale RL training of VLA models. It proposes a novel solution to the challenges of integrating RL and VLA training, achieving up to 2.27 times acceleration compared to baseline methods. The framework supports various VLA architectures and RL algorithms, achieving a 98.11% success rate across 130 LIBERO tasks [3]. Group 2: Practical Applications - RLinf-VLA summarizes best practices for applying RL in VLA training, providing a unified interface that facilitates the use of multiple VLA architectures and simulators, thus lowering the barrier for implementing RL in large-scale VLA applications [3]. - The research emphasizes the importance of RL in enhancing the performance of VLA models, suggesting a shift towards more efficient training methodologies that leverage RL's strengths [15].

Core Insights - The article presents the RLinf-VLA framework, a unified and efficient framework for training Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models using Reinforcement Learning (RL), addressing the limitations of existing models that rely on supervised fine-tuning [2][53] - The framework significantly enhances training efficiency and generalization capabilities, achieving high success rates in various simulation tasks and demonstrating superior performance in real-world applications compared to traditional supervised methods [5][53] Framework Design - The RLinf-VLA framework integrates multiple simulators, algorithms, and VLA architectures, optimizing resource allocation through flexible execution modes and system-level enhancements [4][53] - It supports three GPU allocation strategies: colocated, disaggregated, and hybrid, allowing users to easily switch modes via configuration files, thus reducing system customization costs [10][11] Model Compatibility - The framework supports LoRA for efficient parameter tuning, reducing memory consumption and accelerating training while maintaining performance [12] - It is compatible with OpenVLA and its extension OpenVLA-OFT, which have shown strong performance in various robotic operation benchmarks [12][22] Multi-Simulator Support - The framework emphasizes the importance of simulators in RL, utilizing ManiSkill and LIBERO as primary simulators to achieve diverse task capabilities [13] - It provides a unified interface for different simulators, facilitating the implementation of various tasks and supporting multiple RL algorithms, initially focusing on PPO and GRPO [13][14] Algorithm Design - The framework incorporates advanced techniques for advantage function and log-probability calculations, allowing for flexible integration of block-level and action-level definitions [14][15] - It supports various optimization strategies, including trajectory length normalization and effective action masking, to enhance training stability and performance [19][20] Experimental Results - The RLinf-VLA framework demonstrated significant performance improvements, with success rates increasing by 45% to 70% in various tasks compared to baseline models [22][24] - In LIBERO tasks, the framework achieved an average success rate of 98.11%, showcasing its capability for large-scale multi-task reinforcement learning [28] High Efficiency Performance - The framework's efficiency is evaluated based on throughput, achieving substantial improvements in training speed across different GPU configurations [30][35] - The hybrid allocation mode outperformed traditional methods, demonstrating the benefits of pipeline overlapping in resource utilization [35][37] Real-World Deployment - The RLinf-VLA framework was successfully deployed in real-world environments, showing superior zero-shot generalization capabilities compared to supervised fine-tuning strategies [51][53] - The experiments indicated that RL-trained models could adapt better to real-world tasks, achieving higher success rates in object manipulation tasks [51] Conclusion - The RLinf-VLA framework represents a significant advancement in the field of embodied intelligence, providing a robust foundation for future research and development in VLA training [53]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the shift in focus from pre-training to post-training in large language models (LLMs), highlighting the diminishing returns of scaling laws as model sizes reach hundreds of billions of parameters [2][3][11]. Group 1: Importance of Post-Training - Post-training is recognized as a crucial phase for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of models like OpenAI's series, DeepSeek R1, and Google Gemini, marking it as a necessary step towards advanced intelligence [3][11]. - The article introduces various innovative post-training methods such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF), and Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) [2][3][12]. Group 2: Transition from Pre-Training to Post-Training - The evolution from pre-training to instruction fine-tuning is discussed, where foundational models are trained on large datasets to predict the next token, but often lack practical utility in real-world applications [7][8]. - Post-training aims to align model behavior with user expectations, focusing on quality over quantity in the datasets used, which are typically smaller but more refined compared to pre-training datasets [11][24]. Group 3: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) - Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) is described as a process that transforms a pre-trained model into one that can follow user instructions effectively, relying on high-quality instruction-answer pairs [21][24]. - The quality of the SFT dataset is critical, as even a small number of low-quality samples can negatively impact the model's performance [25][26]. Group 4: Reinforcement Learning Techniques - Reinforcement Learning (RL) is highlighted as a complex yet effective method for model fine-tuning, with various reward mechanisms such as RLHF, RLAIF, and RLVR being employed to enhance model performance [39][41]. - The article outlines the importance of reward models in RLHF, which are trained using human preference data to guide model outputs [44][46]. Group 5: Evaluation of Post-Training Models - The evaluation of post-training models is multifaceted, requiring a combination of automated and human assessments to capture various quality aspects [57][58]. - Automated evaluations are cost-effective and quick, while human evaluations provide a more subjective quality measure, especially for nuanced tasks [59][60].

Core Insights - The article discusses the development of the SimpleVLA-RL framework, which enhances the training of Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models in robotics through reinforcement learning (RL) techniques, addressing the limitations of traditional supervised fine-tuning (SFT) methods [2][4][30] Group 1: Research Background and Challenges - VLA models are crucial for integrating visual perception, language understanding, and action generation in robotic control, but current training methods face significant challenges, including data scarcity and weak generalization capabilities [2][5] - The breakthrough in large reasoning models suggests that RL can improve the sequential action planning capabilities of VLA models, but traditional RL methods are limited by manual reward design and the high cost of environmental interactions [2][5] Group 2: Contributions of SimpleVLA-RL - SimpleVLA-RL is designed specifically for VLA, incorporating interactive trajectory sampling and multi-environment parallel rendering, which significantly reduces training costs and improves scalability [6][9] - The framework has achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance across multiple benchmarks, with notable improvements in success rates, such as LIBERO's average success rate increasing from 91.0% to 99.1% [6][12] - SimpleVLA-RL demonstrates enhanced data efficiency, achieving a LIBERO average success rate of 96.9% with only one demonstration trajectory, surpassing traditional methods [16][17] Group 3: Generalization and Real-World Application - The framework shows robust generalization capabilities across unseen tasks, with significant performance improvements in various scenarios, indicating its ability to learn universal skills rather than overfitting to specific data [22][30] - SimpleVLA-RL has proven effective in sim-to-real transfer, with real-world task success rates improving from 17.5% to 38.5%, validating its deployment capabilities [7][21] Group 4: Key Discoveries - The framework has led to the discovery of the "Pushcut" phenomenon, where the RL-trained model autonomously develops more efficient strategies beyond human demonstrations, showcasing the potential for innovative robotic behaviors [24][30] - The effectiveness of SimpleVLA-RL is contingent on the initial model capabilities, with significant performance enhancements observed when starting from a higher baseline success rate [28][29]

Core Insights - The article discusses the transition from static large language models (LLMs) to self-evolving agents capable of continuous learning and adaptation in dynamic environments, paving the way towards artificial superintelligence (ASI) [3][4][46] - It emphasizes the need for a structured framework to understand and design self-evolving agents, focusing on three fundamental questions: what to evolve, when to evolve, and how to evolve [6][46] Group 1: What to Evolve - Self-evolving agents can improve various components such as models, memory, tools, and architecture over time to enhance performance and adaptability [19][20] - The evolution of these components is crucial for the agent's ability to handle complex tasks and environments effectively [19][20] Group 2: When to Evolve - The article categorizes self-evolution into two time modes: intra-test-time self-evolution, which occurs during task execution, and inter-test-time self-evolution, which happens between tasks [22][23] - Intra-test-time self-evolution allows agents to adapt in real-time to specific challenges, while inter-test-time self-evolution leverages accumulated experiences for future performance improvements [22][23] Group 3: How to Evolve - Self-evolution emphasizes a continuous learning process where agents learn from real-world interactions, seek feedback, and adjust strategies dynamically [26][27] - Various methodologies for self-evolution include reward-based evolution, imitation learning, and population-based approaches, each with distinct feedback types and data sources [29][30] Group 4: Applications and Evaluation - Self-evolving agents have significant potential in various fields, including programming, education, and healthcare, where continuous adaptation is essential [6][34] - Evaluating self-evolving agents presents unique challenges, requiring metrics that capture adaptability, knowledge retention, and long-term generalization capabilities [34][36] Group 5: Future Directions - The article highlights the importance of addressing challenges such as catastrophic forgetting, knowledge transfer, and ensuring safety and controllability in self-evolving agents [40][43] - Future research should focus on developing scalable architectures, dynamic evaluation methods, and personalized agents that can adapt to individual user preferences [38][44]

Core Insights - The article discusses the implementation of the Think-In-Games (TiG) framework, which allows large language models to play the game Honor of Kings while learning in real-time, effectively bridging the gap between decision-making and action [1][3][4]. Group 1: TiG Framework Overview - TiG redefines decision-making based on reinforcement learning as a language modeling task, enabling models to generate strategies guided by language and optimize them through online reinforcement learning [3][4]. - The framework allows large language models to learn macro-level reasoning skills, focusing on long-term goals and team coordination rather than just micro-level actions [6][9]. - The model acts more like a strategic coach than a professional player, converting decisions into text and selecting macro actions based on game state [7][9]. Group 2: Training Methodology - The training process involves a multi-stage approach combining supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) to enhance model capabilities [12][16]. - The research team utilized a "relabeling algorithm" to ensure each game state is tagged with the most critical macro action, providing a robust signal for subsequent training [9][11]. - The Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) algorithm is employed to maximize the advantages of generated content while limiting divergence from reference models [9][11]. Group 3: Experimental Results - The results indicate that the combination of SFT and GRPO significantly improves model performance, with Qwen-2.5-32B's accuracy increasing from 66.67% to 86.84% after applying GRPO [14][15]. - The Qwen-3-14B model achieved an impressive accuracy of 90.91% after training with SFT and GRPO [2][15]. - The TiG framework demonstrates competitive performance compared to traditional reinforcement learning methods while significantly reducing data and computational requirements [17].

Core Insights - The article discusses the development of Embodied-R1, a new model designed to bridge the "seeing-to-doing gap" in robotics, which has been a long-standing challenge in the field [2][32] - The model introduces a novel intermediate representation called "pointing," which allows complex operational instructions to be translated into visual points, enhancing the robot's ability to understand and execute tasks [3][10] Group 1: Challenges in Robotics - The "seeing-to-doing gap" is primarily caused by data scarcity and morphological heterogeneity, which hinder effective knowledge transfer in robotics [2] - Existing visual-language-action (VLA) models struggle with performance in new environments, often losing zero-shot operational capabilities [2][10] Group 2: Embodied-R1 Model Overview - Embodied-R1 is a 3 billion parameter model that utilizes "pointing" as an intuitive intermediate representation, defining four key capabilities: REG (representational understanding), RRG (spatial region pointing), OFG (functional part pointing), and VTG (visual trajectory generation) [10][12] - The model has demonstrated superior performance in 11 spatial reasoning and pointing tasks, achieving a 56.2% success rate in the SIMPLEREnv simulation and an impressive 87.5% in eight real-world tasks without fine-tuning [10][27] Group 3: Training Methodology - The model employs a two-phase training curriculum, focusing first on spatial reasoning and then on embodied pointing capabilities, utilizing a large dataset of 200,000 samples [15][16] - Reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) is introduced to address the "multi-solution dilemma" in pointing tasks, allowing the model to develop a generalized understanding rather than memorizing specific answers [17][19] Group 4: Performance Metrics - Embodied-R1 outperforms other models in various benchmarks, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) results in REG, RRG, OFG, and VTG tasks [29][30] - The model's trajectory generation quality is the best among all compared models, which is crucial for reliable robot execution [29] Group 5: Robustness and Adaptability - The model exhibits strong robustness against visual disturbances, maintaining performance even under challenging conditions such as poor lighting and background changes [31] - This adaptability is attributed to the "pointing" representation, which enhances the robot's strategic robustness [31] Group 6: Conclusion - The introduction of Embodied-R1 marks a significant advancement in addressing the long-standing "seeing-to-doing gap" in robotics, providing a promising pathway for developing more powerful and generalizable embodied AI systems [32]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant research paper that explores the effectiveness of reinforcement learning (RL) compared to supervised fine-tuning (SFT) in training AI models, particularly focusing on the concept of generalization and transferability of knowledge across different tasks [1][5][14]. Group 1: Training Methods - There are two primary methods for training AI models: imitation (SFT) and exploration (RL) [2][3]. - Imitation learning involves training models to replicate data, while exploration allows models to discover solutions independently, assuming they have a non-random chance of solving problems [3][6]. Group 2: Generalization and Transferability - The core of the research is the concept of generalization, where SFT may hinder the ability to adapt known knowledge to unknown domains, while RL promotes better transferability [5][7]. - A Transferability Index (TI) was introduced to measure the ability to transfer skills across tasks, revealing that RL-trained models showed positive transfer in various reasoning tasks, while SFT models often exhibited negative transfer in non-reasoning tasks [7][8]. Group 3: Experimental Findings - The study conducted rigorous experiments comparing RL and SFT models, finding that RL models improved performance in unrelated fields, while SFT models declined in non-mathematical areas despite performing well in mathematical tasks [10][14]. - The results indicated that RL models maintained a more stable internal knowledge structure, allowing them to adapt better to new domains without losing foundational knowledge [10][14]. Group 4: Implications for AI Development - The findings suggest that while imitation learning has been a preferred method, reinforcement learning offers a promising approach for developing intelligent systems capable of generalizing knowledge across various fields [14][15]. - The research emphasizes that true intelligence in AI involves the ability to apply learned concepts to new situations, akin to human learning processes [14][15].

Core Insights - The article discusses the limitations of general large language models in clinical scenarios, particularly in providing accurate medical diagnoses, highlighting the need for specialized training methods like supervised fine-tuning (SFT) [1][2][3] - The performance of the Doukou Gynecology model improved significantly from an initial accuracy of 77.1% to 90.2% through targeted SFT processes [1][3] Data Quality Control - The training dataset underwent a rigorous selection process involving systematic data cleaning, ensuring consistency between reasoning and results, and verifying the logical integrity of the data [2][5] - Low-quality data, such as those with clear medical inconsistencies, were excluded to maintain high standards [2] Model Training Phases - The first phase involved building a foundational SFT model using 1,300 meticulously labeled gynecological consultation data, achieving an initial accuracy of 77.1% [3] - The second phase focused on synthesizing symptom data and refining the model, resulting in a final diagnostic accuracy of 90.2% for six major gynecological symptoms [3][6] Iterative Optimization - Continuous iterative optimization was implemented, where high-quality samples scoring above 8 were added to the training set for further SFT, creating a cycle of training, evaluation, and retraining [10][18] - Key performance indicators were monitored throughout the process to ensure comprehensive model improvement [10] Evaluation System - A dual evaluation system was established, combining automated assessments with manual reviews by medical experts to ensure diagnostic accuracy [11][13] - The automated evaluation system utilized a high-performance language model to objectively score outputs based on a structured framework [11] Challenges and Lessons Learned - Initial reliance on manual labeling slowed data accumulation and increased costs, prompting a shift to a more efficient "machine distillation → expert review → post-training evaluation" system [14][15] - The model's ability to recognize rare diseases was enhanced through balanced sampling strategies [15] Future Directions - The company plans to explore a collaborative training paradigm combining SFT and reinforcement learning (RL) to enhance clinical reasoning capabilities [18]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the relationship between mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and their ability to transfer these skills to other tasks, highlighting that models trained with reinforcement learning (RL) show better transferability compared to those trained with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) [4][11]. Group 1: Mathematical Reasoning and Transferability - Research indicates that only models trained with RL can effectively transfer mathematical reasoning skills to other tasks, while SFT models show limited or no transfer [4][11]. - A Transferability Index (TI) is introduced to quantify the extent to which improvements in mathematical reasoning can be applied to other reasoning and non-reasoning tasks [8][9]. - If TI is greater than 0, it indicates a positive transfer effect to other tasks; if less than 0, it indicates negative transfer [9]. Group 2: Experimental Findings - The study evaluated over 20 models across various tasks, including mathematical reasoning, other reasoning tasks (like medical reasoning), and non-reasoning tasks (like common-sense dialogue) [7]. - Results show that models fine-tuned with RL consistently achieve higher transferability metrics across reasoning and non-reasoning tasks, while SFT models often experience negative transfer in non-reasoning tasks [11]. Group 3: Model Representation and Performance - PCA analysis reveals that RL fine-tuned models exhibit minimal shifts in representation space, indicating they retain previously learned knowledge while enhancing performance in specific domains [15]. - RL models demonstrate lower KL divergence in reasoning and non-reasoning tasks compared to SFT models, suggesting more stable and precise representation updates [16][18]. - The findings suggest that RL is crucial for achieving transferable reasoning capabilities in LLMs, marking another victory for reinforcement learning in this context [19].