投资要点： 分析师：梁俊炜 执业证书编号：S1410524090001 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 和中证 1000（0.53%）涨幅最大，而上证 50（-0.43%）和沪深 300（-0.29%）下跌。 当年涨跌情况，中证 500（5.49%）涨幅最大，其次是中证 1000（4.1%）和创业板 指（3.95%），中证全指（3.78%）和中证 2000（3.46%）涨幅扩大，而沪深 300（3.17%） 涨幅最小。另外，中证 500、中证 1000、中证 2000 和中证全指连续三日连阳。 ◆均线比较：各跟踪指数仍在 5 至 60 日均线之上。创业板指自 2025 年 11 月首次 突破近 250 日高位。中证 500、中证 1000、中证 2000 和中证全指再次突破近 250 相关研究报告 证券研究报告·金融工程报告 2026 年 1 月 8 日 江海证券研究发展部 金融工程定期报告 金融工程研究组 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动态 2026.01.08 ◆市场表现：2026 年 1 月 7 日, 各宽基指数（表 1）涨跌各现，其中中证 500（0.78%） ...

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including metrics such as daily returns, moving averages, turnover rates, risk premiums, PE-TTM, dividend yields, and price-to-book ratios[1][2][3] - The turnover rate of indices is calculated using the formula: $ \text{Turnover Rate} = \frac{\Sigma(\text{Component Stocks' Free Float Shares} \times \text{Component Stocks' Turnover Rate})}{\Sigma(\text{Component Stocks' Free Float Shares})} $ This metric reflects the liquidity and trading activity of the indices[15] - The risk premium is measured relative to the 10-year government bond yield, serving as a benchmark for assessing the relative investment value and deviation of indices. The report highlights that indices like CSI 500 and SSE 50 exhibit high 5-year percentile values for risk premiums, indicating relatively attractive valuations[25][26][29] - The PE-TTM (Price-to-Earnings Trailing Twelve Months) is used as a valuation metric, with indices such as CSI 500 and CSI All Share showing high 5-year percentile values (99.92%), suggesting elevated valuations compared to historical levels[37][40][42] - Dividend yield is analyzed as a measure of cash return to investors, with indices like the ChiNext Index and CSI 300 showing relatively high 5-year historical percentile values (57.93% and 31.65%, respectively), indicating their attractiveness during periods of market downturns or declining interest rates[46][51][53] - The price-to-book ratio (P/B) is evaluated through the "break net ratio," which measures the proportion of stocks trading below their book value. The report notes that indices such as SSE 50 and CSI 300 have higher break net ratios, reflecting market sentiment and valuation levels[52][55]

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including metrics such as daily returns, turnover rates, risk premiums, PE-TTM, dividend yields, and net asset break rates[1][2][3] - **Risk Premium Analysis**: The risk premium is calculated using the yield of 10-year government bonds as the risk-free rate. The report highlights that indices like CSI 500 (52.54%) and CSI 2000 (48.73%) have relatively high 5-year percentile values, while indices like SSE 50 (30.87%) and ChiNext (19.05%) are lower. The risk premium for CSI 500 and CSI 2000 shows higher volatility compared to other indices[29][31][33] - **PE-TTM Analysis**: The PE-TTM values are used as a valuation reference. CSI 500 (97.6%) and CSI All Share (96.28%) have high 5-year percentile values, while SSE 50 (85.7%) and ChiNext (58.43%) are relatively lower. The report notes that the valuation levels of most indices have been on an upward trend since late 2024, with a turning point observed in September 2025[41][44][45] - **Dividend Yield Analysis**: Dividend yield is analyzed as a measure of cash return. ChiNext (61.57%) and CSI 1000 (35.79%) are at relatively high 5-year historical percentiles, while CSI 500 (15.62%) and CSI 2000 (12.81%) are lower. The report emphasizes the importance of high dividend yields during periods of market downturns and declining interest rates[50][55][57] - **Net Asset Break Rate**: The net asset break rate, which reflects the proportion of stocks trading below their net asset value, is used as a market valuation indicator. Current break rates are reported as SSE 50 (22.0%), CSI 500 (11.2%), CSI 1000 (8.1%), and CSI 2000 (3.55%), among others. A lower break rate may indicate market optimism about future growth[56][59][61]

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including their daily returns, moving averages, turnover rates, and valuation metrics such as PE-TTM and dividend yield[1][2][4] - The turnover rate of the indices is calculated using the formula: $ \text{Turnover Rate} = \frac{\Sigma(\text{Component Stock Free Float Shares} \times \text{Component Stock Turnover Rate})}{\Sigma(\text{Component Stock Free Float Shares})} $ This metric reflects the liquidity and trading activity of the indices[19] - The risk premium of the indices is measured relative to the 10-year government bond yield, serving as a benchmark for risk-free rates. The report highlights the mean-reversion behavior of risk premiums and their volatility trends over time[29][30] - The PE-TTM (Price-to-Earnings Trailing Twelve Months) is used as a valuation metric to assess the investment value of indices. The report observes that the PE-TTM values of indices like CSI 500 and CSI All Share are at relatively high historical percentiles, while indices like SSE 50 and ChiNext are at lower percentiles[41][44][45] - Dividend yield is analyzed as a measure of cash return to investors. The report notes that indices such as ChiNext and CSI 300 have relatively high historical percentiles for dividend yield, while CSI 500 and CSI 2000 are at lower percentiles[50][52][56] - The report also tracks the net asset value (NAV) break rate, which indicates the proportion of stocks trading below their book value. A higher break rate suggests undervaluation, while a lower rate may indicate market optimism. Current break rates for indices like SSE 50 and CSI 300 are higher compared to others like CSI 2000 and CSI All Share[57][59]

- The report tracks the performance of various broad-based indices in the A-share market, noting that on December 24, 2025, all indices except the SSE 50 increased, with the CSI 2000 and CSI 1000 showing the largest gains of 1.55% and 1.54%, respectively[2] - The report compares the moving averages of the indices, highlighting that the CSI 1000 broke through the 60-day moving average, and all tracked indices are above the 5, 10, 20, and 60-day moving averages[13] - The report analyzes the trading volume and turnover rates, noting that on December 24, 2025, the CSI 2000 had the highest trading volume share at 24.78%, followed by the CSI 300 and CSI 1000, both at 21.96%[17] - The report examines the daily return distribution, indicating that the ChiNext Index has the largest negative skewness and kurtosis, while the CSI 2000 has the smallest negative skewness and kurtosis[23][25] - The report evaluates the risk premium of the indices relative to the 10-year government bond yield, noting that the CSI 1000 and CSI 500 have high 5-year percentile values of 89.44% and 88.1%, respectively, while the CSI 300 and SSE 50 have lower values of 64.21% and 47.46%[28][31] - The report assesses the PE-TTM ratios of the indices, highlighting that the CSI 500 and CSI 1000 have high 5-year percentile values of 96.94% and 94.63%, respectively, while the SSE 50 and ChiNext Index have lower values of 84.05% and 59.17%[42][43] - The report analyzes the dividend yield, noting that the ChiNext Index and CSI 1000 have high 5-year historical percentile values of 61.32% and 39.09%, respectively, while the CSI 500 and CSI 2000 have lower values of 17.77% and 16.36%[51][53] - The report examines the net asset value break rate, indicating that the current break rates for the indices are 22.0% for the SSE 50, 16.0% for the CSI 300, 10.8% for the CSI 500, 8.0% for the CSI 1000, 3.25% for the CSI 2000, and 6.14% for the CSI All Share Index[57]

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including their daily investment dynamics, moving averages, turnover rates, risk premiums, PE-TTM, dividend yields, and net asset break rates[1][2][4] - The turnover rate of the indices is calculated as the sum of the free-float market capitalization of constituent stocks multiplied by their turnover rates, divided by the total free-float market capitalization of the constituent stocks[17] - The risk premium is measured relative to the yield of 10-year government bonds, serving as a reference for risk-free rates, to evaluate the relative investment value and deviation of the indices[27][29] - The PE-TTM (Price-to-Earnings Trailing Twelve Months) is used as a valuation reference to assess the investment value of the indices at the current point in time[37][41] - Dividend yield is tracked to reflect the cash dividend return rate, which is particularly significant during market downturns as high dividend yields often act as a safe haven[46][51] - The net asset break rate is defined as the proportion of stocks with a price-to-book ratio below 1, indicating undervaluation in the market[52][55]

Content: --------- <doc id='1'>证券研究报告·金融工程报告 2025 年 12 月 18 日 江海证券研究发展部 金融工程定期报告 金融工程研究组 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动态 2025.12.18 ◆市场表现：2025 年 12 月 17 日, 各宽基指数（表 1）全部上涨，其中创业板指（3.39%） 投资要点：</doc> <doc id='2'>分析师：梁俊炜 执业证书编号：S1410524090001 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 和中证 500（1.95%）涨幅最大。当年涨跌情况，创业板指（48.3%）涨幅最大，其 次是中证 2000（30.48%）和中证 500（24.66%），中证 1000（22.34%）和中证全指 （21.17%）涨幅扩大，而上证 50（11.43%）涨幅最小。 ◆均线比较：除了中证 1000 和中证 2000，其余跟踪指数已突破 5 日及 20 日均线。 创业板指率先突破 60 日均线。各跟踪指数单日修复程度较大。 ◆资金占比与换手：2025 年 12 月 17 日, 沪深 300（25.34%）交易金额占比最高， 相关研究报告</doc> <doc id='3'>态 2025.12.17 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 态 2025.12.16 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 态 2025.12.15 其次是中证 2000（23.94%）和中证 1000（20.51%）。各宽基指数当前换手率分别 为中证 2000（3.88），创业板指（2.41），中证 1000（2.24），中证全指（1.63）， 中证 500（1.56），沪深 300（0.54）和上证 50（0.23）。 ◆日收益率分布：创业板指的峰度负偏离最大，中证 1000 的峰度负偏离最小。上 证 50 和创业板指的负偏态最大，中证 1000 和中证 2000 的负偏态最小。 ◆风险溢价：2025 年 12 月 17 日, 创业板指（97.14%）和中证 500（96.59%）风险 溢价近 5 年分位值较高，中证 1000（88.41%）和中证 2000（69.05%）较低。</doc> <doc id='4'>◆PE-TTM：中证 500（95.04%）和中证 1000（93.47%）分位值较高，而中证 2000 （79.17%）和创业板指（57.69%）分位值较低。 ◆股债性价比：没有指数高于其 80%分位，中证 500 低于其 20%分位。 ◆股息率：创业板指（63.22%）和中证 1000（51.65%）所处近 5 年历史分位值较 高，而中证 2000（31.32%）和中证 500（24.55%）较低。 ◆破净率：当前，各指数破净率为上证 50（22.0%），沪深 300（16.33%），中证 500（11.2%），中证 1000（8.3%），中证 2000（3.8%），创业板指（nan%）和中 证全指（6.51%）。 ◆风险提示：本报告可能存在数据缺失、数据错误、数据不及时、模型处理错误 等风险。本报告仅从金融工程角度，对重要指数的市场数据进行跟踪、统计、分 析，不构成对市场指数、行业或个股进行预测或推荐。</doc> <doc id='6'>| 市场衣乳… | | --- | | 1.1 指数表现 … | | 1.2 指数与均线的比较 | | 1.3 资全占比与换手率 … | | 2 日收益分布 | | 2.1 收益区间分布对比 | | 22 分布形态变化对比 | | 3 风险溢价 … | | 3.1 各宽基指数的风险溢价 | | 32 风险溢价历史分布 | | 4 PE-TTM. | | 4.1 各宽某指数 PE-TTM 和分位值 | | 4.2 PE-TTM 历史对比… | | 4.3 股债性价比历史对比… | | 5 吸血率… | | 5.1 近一年各宽某指数股息率变化情况, | | 5.2 股息率历史对比… | | 6 玻璃率 | | 7 风险提示 . |</doc> <doc id='8'>| 表 1、各宽基指数表现情况 | | --- | | 表 2、各宽基指数与均线、近250交易日高位和低位的比较 … | | 表 3 、各宽基指数分布形态变化 … | | 表 4、各宽基指数和十年期国债即期收益率的风险溢价 | | 表 5、各宽基指数 PE-TTM 分位值和历史值 | | 表 6、各宽基指数当前股息率和历史情况 | | 图 1、各宽基指数交易全额占比和换手率 | | 图 2、各宽基指数每日收益率分布情况 | | 图 3、各宽基指数相对十年国债即期收益率的风险溢价 | | 图 4、各宽基指数相对沪深 300 的风险溢价的近 5年分布 . | | 图 5 、各宽基指数 PE-TTM 及其分位值 | | 图 6、各宽基指数的股债性价比… | | 图 7、各宽基指数股息率 | | 图 8、各宽基指数破净个股数和占比………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 |</doc> <doc id='10'>1 市场表现 本报告将从指数涨跌幅、连阴连阳、上涨下跌分布等维度对各宽基指数进 行评价和跟踪。 1.1 指数表现 </doc> <doc id='11'>2025 年 12 月 17 日, 各宽基指数（表 1）全部上涨，其中创业板指（3.39%） 和中证 500（1.95%）涨幅最大。当周涨跌情况，各跟踪指数全部下跌，其中 中证 2000（-1.22%）和中证 1000（-1.12%）跌幅最大。当月涨跌情况，各跟踪 指数涨跌各现，其中创业板指（4.04%）和中证 500（1.51%）涨幅最大，而中 证 2000（-0.89%）和中证 1000（-0.62%）下跌。当季涨跌情况，各跟踪指数除 了上证 50（0.09%）外全部下跌，其中中证 1000（-3.78%）和中证 500（-3.7%） 跌幅最大。当年涨跌情况，创业板指（48.3%）涨幅最大，其次是中证 2000（30.48%） 和中证 500（24.66%），中证 1000（22.34%）和中证全指（21.17%）涨幅扩大， 而上证 50（11.43%）涨幅最小。 表 1、各宽基指数表现情况 指数名称 指数代码 当日涨幅% 当周涨幅% 当月涨幅% 当季涨幅% 当年涨幅% 日K </doc> <doc id='12'>| 指数名称 | 指数代码 | 当日涨幅% | 当周涨幅% | 当月涨幅% | 当季涨幅% | 当年涨幅% | 日K 连阴连阳 | 周K 连阴连阳 | 月K 连阴连阳 | 季K 连阴连阳 | 年K 连阴连阳 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 上证50 | 000016.SH | 1.25 | -0.10 | 0.74 | 0.09 | 11.43 | | | |

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including their daily price movements, moving averages, turnover rates, and risk premiums[1][2][3] - The turnover rate for each index is calculated using the formula: $ \text{Turnover Rate} = \frac{\Sigma(\text{Circulating Shares of Component Stocks} \times \text{Turnover Rate of Component Stocks})}{\Sigma(\text{Circulating Shares of Component Stocks})} $ This provides insights into the liquidity and trading activity of the indices[17] - The risk premium is measured relative to the 10-year government bond yield, serving as a benchmark for risk-free rates. This metric evaluates the relative investment value and deviation of each index. For instance, the current risk premium for the CSI 500 is -0.79%, with a 5-year historical percentile of 21.98%[27][31] - The PE-TTM (Price-to-Earnings Trailing Twelve Months) ratio is used as a valuation reference. For example, the CSI 500 has a current PE-TTM value of 32.45, with a 5-year historical percentile of 94.96%, indicating a relatively high valuation compared to its historical range[39][43] - Dividend yield is analyzed as a measure of cash return. For instance, the CSI 500 has a current dividend yield of 1.45%, with a 5-year historical percentile of 24.96%, reflecting its position in the historical distribution of dividend yields[48][53] - The report also examines the net asset value (NAV) break rate, which represents the proportion of stocks trading below their book value. For example, the CSI 500 has a current NAV break rate of 11.0%, suggesting market sentiment and valuation levels[54][57]

- The report does not include any quantitative models or factors for analysis or construction[1][2][3] - The content primarily focuses on market performance, index comparisons, turnover rates, risk premiums, PE-TTM, dividend yields, and net-breaking rates of various broad-based indices[1][2][3] - No quantitative models or factors are explicitly mentioned or analyzed in the provided content[1][2][3]

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including their daily returns, moving averages, turnover rates, and valuation metrics such as PE-TTM and risk premiums[1][2][3] - The analysis highlights that all broad-based indices experienced gains on December 8, 2025, with the ChiNext Index (2.6%) and CSI 2000 (1.47%) showing the largest daily increases. For the year-to-date performance, the ChiNext Index (48.97%) recorded the highest growth, followed by CSI 2000 (33.97%) and CSI 500 (25.27%)[10][11] - All indices have surpassed their 5-day, 10-day, and 20-day moving averages, with CSI 1000 and CSI All Share also breaking above their 60-day moving averages. However, CSI 500 remains below its 60-day moving average, indicating a continued market recovery[14][15] - The turnover rates for December 8, 2025, were highest for CSI 2000 (4.34), followed by ChiNext Index (2.78) and CSI 1000 (2.47). The lowest turnover rates were observed for SSE 50 (0.26) and CSI 300 (0.61)[17] - The distribution of daily returns shows that the ChiNext Index has the largest negative kurtosis deviation, while CSI 1000 has the smallest. Similarly, the ChiNext Index exhibits the largest negative skewness, indicating a higher likelihood of extreme negative returns compared to other indices[23][25] - Risk premiums, calculated relative to the 10-year government bond yield, are highest for the ChiNext Index (2.60%) and CSI 2000 (1.46%), with their 5-year percentile ranks at 93.41% and 85.79%, respectively. In contrast, SSE 50 (0.57%) and CSI 300 (0.80%) have lower risk premiums and percentile ranks[27][31] - The PE-TTM ratios for broad-based indices show that CSI 1000 (97.52%) and CSI 500 (95.54%) have the highest 5-year percentile ranks, while CSI 2000 (84.3%) and the ChiNext Index (57.69%) are relatively lower. The ChiNext Index's 5-year percentile rank is below its danger threshold of 80%[39][43][44] - Dividend yields are highest for SSE 50 (3.30%) and CSI 300 (2.71%), while CSI 500 (1.37%) and CSI 2000 (0.75%) are the lowest. The ChiNext Index's 5-year historical percentile rank for dividend yield is relatively high at 66.69%[48][53][55] - The percentage of stocks trading below their book value (PB ratio < 1) is highest for SSE 50 (22.0%) and lowest for the ChiNext Index (1.0%), reflecting varying market valuation attitudes across indices[57]