0:00 美国联邦执法人员枪击致死事件引发持续抗议。当地时间1月30日，成千上万的美国民众走上街头，要 求联邦移民执法官员撤出明尼苏达州。 先后有两名美国公民死于美国移民与海关执法局在明尼阿波利斯市的执法行动后，全美各地民众的愤怒 被点燃。从加州到纽约，全美46个州多地共计组织了约250场抗议活动。抗议者们打着"停止上学，停止 购物，停止资助移民与海关执法局"的口号，与防暴警察发生对峙。当地时间1月30日，抗议者们在美国 首都华盛顿特区游行，要求对移民和海关执法局（ICE）的官员追责，并呼吁削减该机构的资金或将其 解散。 抗议者： "ICE 和其他执法机构已被当作种族主义和非人道的武器，用来攻击我们的社区。我们亲眼看到邻居们 在街头被绑架，从车里、家里、学校里被强行拖走。就在本月（1月）早些时候，明尼阿波利斯的ICE 执法人员在车内枪杀了蕾妮·古德；仅仅两周后，又在街头'处决'了敢于反抗暴行与恐吓的亚历克斯·普 雷蒂。这太可耻了！" 编译、后期：游佳 签审：杨卓英 监制：刘轶瑶 责编：卢思宇、刘凌 ...

在日本网络上，有批评人士认为，丸川是在煽动排外情绪借此拉票，她的言论"极端仇外言论"，"与纳 粹主义无异"。还有日本网民评论说，"外国人侵入生活圈不会有什么问题，但执政党里面有'黑金'议员 很有问题。" 据报道，丸川珠代曾在安倍晋三内阁担任环境大臣、奥运担当大臣等。她因政治资金丑闻未能在上一次 国会选举中当选议员。丸川声称，在她失去工作期间，她体会到了普通人的生活与想法。"例如，外国 人正在增多，已经侵入了我们的生活圈，这引起了不安与困惑。" 近期，日本自民党等保守政党迎合日本右翼的排外情绪，推进所谓"外国人政策"，引发日本社会的担 忧。不少日本专家学者指出，右翼宣扬种族主义、排斥外国人的趋势十分危险，有越来越多的政客利用 这种情绪拉拢选票。 【环球网报道】据日本《每日新闻》等媒体报道，日本自民党众议院选举候选人丸川珠代1月27日演说 时声称"外国人已经侵入了我们的生活圈"，被指煽动排外情绪借此拉票。批评人士表示，丸川的言论 是"极端仇外言论"，"与纳粹主义无异"。 日本自由记者志叶玲评论说，丸川珠代的言论涉嫌违反日本旨在取缔仇恨言论的法律，如果想要成为国 会议员，她应该先遵守法律。他还称，如今日本排外情绪盛 ...

凤凰网科技讯 北京时间1月28日，据《商业内幕》报道，埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk)与美国知名风险投资 家维诺德·科斯拉(Vinod Khosla)"开战"。此前，科斯拉指责马斯克宣扬种族主义，并公开呼吁马斯克的 员工辞职。 "所有在@特斯拉、@SpaceX、@X等公司任职的非白人员工，以及所有正派的白人员工，都应该辞职 并加入我们的投资组合公司，"科斯拉写道，"将你们的领英资料发至我们邮箱！" 马斯克随后以侮辱性言辞回应科斯拉，称这位风投家为"自大的混蛋"，并使用了针对智力障碍者的歧视 性用语。 周一晚间，科斯拉在X上发文称，马斯克将种族主义标榜为"伟大且可取的范式"。此言是对马斯克去年 9月一篇帖文的回应。当时，马斯克声称"白人是全球人口中快速萎缩的少数族群"。马斯克过去曾多次 转发关于白人人口结构变化的帖子。 "维诺德，你不仅是个自大的混蛋，曾试图阻止公众使用你家附近的公共海滩，还是个弱智。我的伴侣 希冯是半印度血统，我和她的长子命名时还致敬了伟大的印度物理学家钱德拉塞卡。"马斯克称。 科斯拉在帖子中呼吁马斯克旗下公司的员工辞职，加入科斯拉旗下科斯拉风投的投资组合公司，其中包 括OpenAI和Rep ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent shooting of a local woman by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in Minnesota has sparked nationwide protests, with calls for the complete abolition of ICE and the withdrawal of immigration enforcement personnel from Democratic-led cities [1][2]. Group 1: Protests and Public Response - Over a thousand protests are planned across the U.S. on October 10, organized by civil rights and immigration groups, demanding the removal of ICE from various cities [1]. - Thousands of people gathered near the site of the shooting to mourn the victim, calling for a fair investigation into the incident [2]. Group 2: Incident Details - The victim, 37-year-old American citizen Raine Nicole Good, was shot during an ICE operation targeting illegal immigrants in Minneapolis, leading to heightened tensions in the area and significant media attention [1]. - The shooting occurred close to the site where George Floyd was killed by police in May 2020, which had previously ignited widespread protests against racism and police violence [2]. Group 3: Government and Political Reactions - The operation that led to Good's death involved approximately 2,000 federal immigration enforcement personnel, described by the Department of Homeland Security as the largest immigration enforcement action in history [1]. - Minnesota's Democratic Governor Tim Walz condemned the operation as a "political stunt," highlighting the stark differences in perspectives between the Democratic-led state and the Republican-led federal government [1].

Core Viewpoint - The shooting incident involving National Guard members in Washington D.C. has escalated into a nationwide immigration policy crisis, with the Trump administration leveraging the tragedy to implement stricter immigration measures [1]. Group 1: Escalation of Immigration Policies - Trump announced a permanent suspension of immigration from "third world countries" to restore the U.S. system and terminate millions of illegal entries during the Biden administration [1]. - He stated intentions to revoke citizenship from those deemed to disrupt domestic peace and deport foreign nationals considered incompatible with Western civilization [1]. Group 2: Rhetoric and Targeting of Specific Communities - White House aide Stephen Miller echoed Trump's stance, suggesting that large-scale immigration is a societal transplant that brings negative conditions from "failed states" to the U.S. [3]. - Trump specifically targeted the Somali community in Minnesota, using derogatory language and criticizing Somali-American Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, which has led to fear and hesitance among Somali residents [4][5]. Group 3: Intensification of Immigration Enforcement - The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has ramped up nationwide arrests, with New Orleans being the latest target aiming to arrest 5,000 individuals, surpassing previous operations in Chicago [5][7]. - ICE operations have also affected lawful immigrants, with reports of green card holders having their citizenship appointments canceled without explanation, raising concerns about systemic rights limitations [7]. Group 4: Political Motivations and Public Sentiment - Former Republican Congressman Walsh noted that Trump's actions are closely tied to his declining approval ratings, suggesting that he may resort to increasingly racist rhetoric to solidify his base [8]. - The politicization of the shooting incident and the simplification of immigration issues into racial labels are putting unprecedented pressure on American national identity and social contracts [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the underlying themes and societal critiques presented in the animated film "Zootopia 2," highlighting its portrayal of class divisions, systemic issues, and cultural differences in America [7][9][15]. Group 1: Themes of Class and Power - The film presents a seemingly utopian society that is, in reality, marked by class distinctions and family control, with the main antagonist family representing deep-rooted power structures akin to conspiracy theories [9][10]. - The new mayor of Zootopia is depicted as a puppet of the powerful Lynx family, illustrating how wealth and influence dictate political outcomes [9][10]. - The narrative reveals that the true power dynamics in Zootopia are maintained by a few elite families, who manipulate the system to their advantage, pushing marginalized groups to the fringes of society [9][10]. Group 2: Societal Critique and Cultural Commentary - The film's portrayal of different animal species reflects real-world cultural differences and the challenges of coexistence, suggesting that inherent traits and instincts can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts [15]. - The conclusion of the film, while appearing positive, hints at a more complex reality where acceptance of differences is fraught with difficulties, mirroring current societal tensions in America [15]. - The article emphasizes that the film's humor masks a deeper, unsettling commentary on the state of American society, questioning whether true acceptance and coexistence are achievable [15].

Core Argument - Georgios Varouxakis' new book "The West: The History of an Idea" offers a groundbreaking interpretation of the origins of the concept of "the West," challenging the prevailing academic consensus that it emerged in the late 19th century as a tool for promoting imperialism and racism [2][5][7]. Group 1: Historical Context and Evolution of the Concept - The term "the West" is often mistakenly viewed as a timeless concept dating back to ancient Greece, but Varouxakis argues that its self-identification began in the late 19th century, specifically in the 1880s and 1890s, to promote imperialism and white supremacy [5][7]. - Varouxakis highlights that earlier uses of "the West" can be traced back to the early 19th century, particularly through the works of Auguste Comte, who envisioned a "Western Republic" as a cultural and civilizational entity [7][8]. - The need for a distinct term arose from the desire to differentiate Western Europe from Russia, which was perceived as a significant threat after the Napoleonic Wars [8][9]. Group 2: Comte's Influence and Ideological Implications - Comte's writings initially focused on "Europe," but he later shifted to using "the West" to better represent a specific cultural community, distancing it from the broader geographical implications of "Europe" [11][12]. - Varouxakis emphasizes Comte's strong anti-imperialist stance, arguing that his vision for "the West" was not aligned with imperialism but rather aimed at promoting a peaceful, altruistic community [13][14]. - The concept of "the West" was intended to foster a sense of unity among Western nations while advocating for the independence of colonies and the abolition of empires [13][14]. Group 3: The Role of Other Thinkers and Global Perspectives - Varouxakis discusses various thinkers, including Francis Lieber, who contributed to the evolution of the concept of "the West" in the 19th century, particularly in the context of American political thought [16][17]. - The book also examines the contributions of non-Western thinkers, such as Rabindranath Tagore, who engaged in discussions about nationalism and the West during the early 20th century [18][19]. - Varouxakis argues that the historical understanding of "the West" is complex and multifaceted, shaped by various cultural, political, and ideological influences over time [24][27]. Group 4: Methodological Approach - The author employs a genealogical approach to trace the historical evolution of the concept of "the West," emphasizing the importance of understanding its various interpretations and uses throughout history [25][26]. - Varouxakis critiques the notion of a singular "Western value system," arguing that many values attributed to the West have origins in other cultures and should not be viewed as exclusive to the West [30][31]. - The book aims to clarify the historical context and potential future meanings of "the West," highlighting its adaptability and relevance in contemporary discussions [28][29].

Core Viewpoint - A large-scale demonstration took place in Caracas, Venezuela, on September 23, calling for the defense of national sovereignty and peace against perceived military threats from the United States in the Caribbean region [1] Group 1: Event Details - The demonstration showcased "people's power" with participation from government officials, the Bolivarian militia, and numerous citizens [1] - The march began from various locations in the city and culminated at Bolívar Avenue in the city center [1] Group 2: Statements from Officials - Pedro Infante, the first vice president of the National Assembly, emphasized that the event represented the unity of the people, military, and police, asserting the willingness of Venezuelans to defend their homeland [1] - Defense Minister Lopez criticized the U.S. for its actions in the Caribbean, labeling them as manifestations of hegemonism and racism, and called for unity among Venezuelans to confront ongoing threats [1] Group 3: Context of U.S.-Venezuela Relations - Relations between the U.S. and Venezuela have been tense, with the U.S. deploying multiple warships in the Caribbean under the pretext of combating drug trafficking [1] - The U.S. has claimed to have destroyed three "drug boats" and killed 17 alleged drug traffickers in the region [1] - President Maduro stated that the U.S. military threats have not been effective and have instead united the Venezuelan people further [1]

Group 1 - President Trump signed an executive order on September 5 to restore the historical name of the Department of Defense as the "Department of War," allowing it to be used as a secondary designation [5][9] - Trump stated on September 2 that he would deploy the National Guard to Chicago to combat crime, indicating that the deployment would happen but not specifying when [6][10] - The Democratic leadership in Chicago, including Mayor Johnson and Governor Pritzker, has expressed strong opposition to Trump's threats of military intervention in the city [9][12] Group 2 - Thousands of protesters gathered in Washington D.C. and Chicago on September 6 to oppose Trump's plans to deploy federal troops, with slogans condemning fascism and demanding an end to military presence [11][12] - The protests in Washington D.C. were among the largest against Trump's federal takeover of local policing, with demonstrators calling for the end of the occupation [13][14] - A recent poll indicated that Trump's overall approval rating stands at 43%, with significant disapproval regarding his handling of inflation and crime [17][20]

Core Viewpoint - Large-scale protests occurred in Washington D.C. and Chicago against President Trump's plans to deploy federal forces to manage local law enforcement, with demonstrators expressing concerns over civil liberties and the militarization of cities [1][3][6]. Group 1: Protests in Washington D.C. - Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Washington D.C. to oppose Trump's federal takeover of local police, marking one of the largest protests against his administration's actions in the capital [3]. - The protest, titled "We Are Washington D.C.," was organized by local autonomy advocates and the American Civil Liberties Union, featuring slogans like "End the Occupation of Washington D.C." and "Trump Must Go" [3][5]. - Washington D.C. Attorney General filed a lawsuit against the deployment of the National Guard, arguing it undermines public safety and impacts the local economy [5]. Group 2: Protests in Chicago - In Chicago, demonstrators protested against Trump's threats to send federal troops, holding signs that read "Stop the Fascist Regime" and "Oppose Trump, Reject Troops" [6][8]. - Organizers claimed the administration's actions were racially motivated, using crime reduction as a pretext to target immigrant communities [6]. - Illinois Governor and Chicago Mayor criticized Trump's threats, stating they undermine national dignity and could violate constitutional rights [8]. Group 3: Federal Response and Legal Context - Trump announced plans to deploy the National Guard to restore order in Washington D.C., labeling cities like Chicago as "problem cities" [5]. - The National Guard presence in Washington D.C. exceeds 2,000 personnel, reflecting a significant federal response to local unrest [5]. - Trump's recent executive order to rename the Department of Defense to "War Department" has raised concerns about the militarization of federal responses to domestic issues [6][8].