Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court issued the "Guiding Opinions on Implementing the Private Economy Promotion Law," aiming to enhance legal protections for the private economy through 25 specific measures, focusing on equal treatment, law-abiding operations, and a fair judicial environment [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Market Environment - The Guiding Opinions emphasize the need for a robust legal framework to support the private economy, including the establishment of a fair and transparent business environment [1]. - It highlights the importance of enforcing the "non-prohibition, entry allowed" policy and addressing local protectionism and hidden barriers to market entry [2][3]. Group 2: Anti-Monopoly and Competition - The Opinions call for strengthened judicial efforts against anti-competitive practices and unfair competition, ensuring that all economic entities can participate fairly in the market [2]. - It also addresses the need for clear regulations on local government practices that may constitute disguised monopolies [2]. Group 3: Debt and Financing Issues - The Opinions propose measures to tackle the issue of overdue payments to private enterprises, including the establishment of a mechanism for preventing and clearing overdue debts [4]. - It aims to regulate financial institutions' practices regarding loan conditions to protect the rights of private enterprises [4]. Group 4: Dispute Resolution and Credit System - The Opinions seek to lower the costs of dispute resolution for private enterprises by improving the credit repair mechanism and addressing non-compliance in enforcement actions [6]. - It emphasizes the need for timely updates of credit information to facilitate normal financing for enterprises [6]. Group 5: Enforcement and Compliance - The Supreme People's Court stresses the importance of increasing enforcement efforts against entities that evade or resist execution, particularly those exhibiting malicious credit behavior [7]. - It aims to ensure that the rights of winning parties in legal disputes are protected through effective enforcement measures [7].

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court of China held a press conference to release the "Judicial Protection Status of Intellectual Property by Chinese Courts (2024)" and typical cases related to intellectual property [1] - In 2023, Chinese courts received nearly 530,000 intellectual property cases and concluded over 540,000, indicating a steady increase in case resolution rates and judicial efficiency [2] - The courts have implemented punitive damages in 460 civil infringement cases, with a year-on-year increase of 44.2%, highlighting a strict approach to intellectual property protection [2] - The Supreme People's Court has introduced comprehensive guidelines to enhance judicial protection for technological innovation, aiming to safeguard the rights of innovation entities [2] Group 1: Judicial Efficiency and Case Management - Chinese courts have seen a stable rise in the number of concluded intellectual property cases, with a case resolution rate that continues to improve [2] - The establishment of 30 specialized intellectual property courts and 558 grassroots courts with jurisdiction over intellectual property cases has optimized the judicial landscape [4] - The implementation of a "three-in-one" trial mechanism across various courts has further enhanced the efficiency of intellectual property judicial protection [4] Group 2: Protection of Innovation and Technology - The Supreme People's Court has actively protected technological innovation by issuing opinions that provide systematic guidance for cases involving high-tech intellectual property [2] - A notable case involving punitive damages for a technology secret infringement in the "new energy vehicle chassis" case resulted in compensation exceeding 640 million yuan, showcasing the court's commitment to protecting innovation [2] - The court has also opened hearings for patent ownership disputes related to "osteoarthritis drugs," reinforcing the protection of research entities [2] Group 3: International Cooperation and Global Governance - The Supreme People's Court has engaged in international cooperation by participating in global governance discussions on intellectual property, including hosting seminars with the World Intellectual Property Organization [7] - The court has actively participated in bilateral and multilateral exchanges, enhancing China's international influence in intellectual property law [8] - In 2024, the courts received 8,252 new foreign-related intellectual property cases, reflecting a commitment to fair treatment of both domestic and foreign parties [7]