然而闹剧并未结束。演讲中，特朗普把在明尼苏达州的索马里移民称为"索马里海盗"，称他们从事欺诈 活动。索马里裔民主党众议员奥马尔当即大喊抗议。 明尼苏达州正是美国移民与海关执法局官员枪杀美国籍女子古德的"舆论风暴眼"。特朗普无视争议，在 演讲中大肆鼓吹其移民执法政策，称美国拥有"迄今最坚固的边境"，当场就遭到民主党人的大声回击。 24日，美国总统特朗普在国会发表其第二任期的首次国情咨文演讲，他创纪录地讲了约110分钟，着重 晒出其在经济民生方面的"成绩单"，为中期选举铺路。然而，现场他与民主党人多次发生争论，两党对 立愈发严重。 开场还不到5分钟，得克萨斯州民主党议员艾尔·格林走到议席中间，展开一块横幅，上面写着："黑人 不是猿"。格林随即被带离场。 而特朗普在讲话中着重晒出的经济"成绩单"，则被美国媒体查出存在多处夸大，甚至援引了错误数据。 东方卫视驻美记者李源清分析认为，"最近最高法院对他的关税做出不利裁定，他在演讲中表达不满， 称裁决'令人遗憾'，但整体篇幅并不长、也没有把它升级成今晚的主战场。原因也不难理解：这件事对 他来说并不是一个'成功政绩'，既打到了他的招牌政策，又把问题带进了'总统权力边界'的争 ...

特朗普当晚演讲长约110分钟，绝大多数时间着力于国内问题，夸耀其在刺激经济、打击"非法移 民"等方面取得的"成就"。特朗普称，虽然前任政府给其留下"烂摊子"，但现在美国处于"黄金时 代"，"比以往任何时候都更加强大、更加美好、更加富裕"。 特朗普发表演讲不到5分钟，民主党众议员阿尔·格林展开横幅抗议，但随即被带离现场。演讲中， 特朗普把索马里移民称为"索马里海盗"，称他们从事欺诈活动。索马里裔民主党众议员伊尔汗·奥马尔 立即大喊："你说谎！" 特朗普演讲期间，现场的民主党人大部分时间沉默以对，与特朗普每讲几句话就起立鼓掌的共和党 议员形成强烈反差。部分民主党议员在演讲期间离场。据美国阿克西奥斯新闻网站报道，约有一半民主 党议员没有到场。 特朗普承诺改善经济民生是其2024年胜选的主要因素之一。在此次演讲中，他着重强调其经济"政 绩"，试图缓解美国民众对其经济政策的不满。他宣称已遏制通货膨胀，推动股价创下新高，降低了药 品、汽油、住房价格。特朗普在演讲中指责美国最高法院推翻其关税政策，称有关裁决"完全错误"，但 他会找到"更加强大"的解决方法。 新华社华盛顿2月24日电 美国总统特朗普24日晚在国会发表国情咨文 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. Senate is facing new obstacles in negotiations over a government funding bill, significantly increasing the risk of a partial government shutdown on Saturday [1] - The agreement reached between Senate Democrats and President Trump aimed to ensure operational funding for various government agencies, including defense and healthcare, while also addressing new immigration policy restrictions [1][2] - Senate legislative action has stalled due to opposition from some members, with the current government funding authorization set to expire at midnight [2] Group 2 - The funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has been separated from the comprehensive funding plan to prevent immigration enforcement controversies from affecting other government agencies [2] - Recent incidents involving immigration enforcement personnel have led to strong dissatisfaction among Senate Democrats, who have threatened to delay the funding plan to compel the Trump administration to impose restrictions on DHS [2][3] - The agreement extends DHS funding for two weeks, allowing time for negotiations on immigration enforcement strategies [3]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the federal government cannot deploy the National Guard to the Chicago area, marking a rare setback for the Trump administration, which has previously enjoyed support from the court regarding broad presidential powers [1][2]. Group 1 - The Supreme Court rejected the Justice Department's request to overturn a federal judge's order that blocked the deployment of hundreds of National Guard members in Chicago [1]. - The ruling stated that the government failed to clearly demonstrate its authority to send troops to Illinois for law enforcement tasks at the current pre-trial stage [1]. - The court indicated that presidential command over the National Guard may only apply in "special" circumstances [1]. Group 2 - The lawsuit stems from differing descriptions of protests against Trump's strict immigration enforcement policies in Chicago and surrounding areas [1]. - Trump and his allies claim that cities governed by Democrats are experiencing lawlessness and rampant crime, characterized by large-scale violent protests [1]. - Critics, including Democratic mayors and governors, as well as federal judges, have questioned these claims [1]. Group 3 - White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson stated that the ruling would not affect Trump's commitment to advancing immigration law enforcement and protecting federal workers from violent protesters [2]. - Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker described the ruling as an important step in curbing the federal government's ongoing abuse of power and delaying its move toward authoritarianism [2]. - The National Guard is typically organized by states and is under the command of state governors, only transitioning to federal service when ordered by the president [2].