据潮新闻，12月10日，有网友反映，某短视频平台主播"周周珍可爱625"（实名周珍）名下控股企业涉嫌逃税，已被国家税 务总局佛山市税务局查处，涉及金额逾1600万元。 每日经济新闻综合自潮新闻（记者商泽阳）、公开消息等 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 目前，这名主播仍在直播，并为"双十二"促销活动做准备。根据网友提供的线索，"周周珍可爱625"名下的广东嘉星投资集团 有限公司全资持股的广东嘉星文化传媒有限公司，因在账簿上不列或少列收入，被国家税务总局佛山市税务局第一稽查局认 定存在违法行为，该公司少缴税款达16591280.31元，罚款金额为8295640.21元。潮新闻记者查询发现，"周周珍可爱625"实 名信息"周珍"，在该平台拥有5044.7万粉丝，账号认证为吉尼斯水乳精华销量王、平台国补合伙人，视频内容以美妆产品为 主，影响力较大，还是湖南娄底市助农公益大使。其店铺位列平台面部护肤店铺榜第5名，近期销量超过99%的同行，近7天 热卖商品超10万件。 | 行政相对人名称 | 广东嘉星文化传媒有限公司 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 行政相对人类别: | 法 ...

据潮新闻，12月10日，有网友反映，某短视频平台主播"周周珍可爱625"（实名周珍）名下控股企业涉嫌逃税，已被国家税 务总局佛山市税务局查处，涉及金额逾1600万元。 | 行政相对人名称 | 广东嘉星文化传媒有限公司 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 行政相对人类别: | 法人及非法人组织 | | | | | | 统一社会信用代码 | | 91440605MA540DLJ41 | | | 行政相对人代码: | 组织机构代码 工商注册号 | 税务登记号 | 事业单位证书号 | 轩令相给原归班号 | | | MA540DLJ4 | | | | | 法定代表人: | 1 | | | | | 法定代表人证件类型: | 身份证 | | | | | 法定代表人证件号码: | 432503*******5097 | | | | | 行政处罚决定文书号: | 佛税一稽罚〔2025〕99号 | | | | | 违法行为类型: | 逃避缴纳税款 | | | | | 苗栗状況 | 在账簿上不列或少列收入 | | | | | 处罚依据: | 《中华人民共和国税收征收管理法》第六十三条 ...

目前，这名主播仍在直播，并为"双十二"促销活动做准备。根据网友提供的线索，"周周珍可爱625"名下的广东嘉星投资集团有限公司全资持股的广东嘉 星文化传媒有限公司，因在账簿上不列或少列收入，被国家税务总局佛山市税务局第一稽查局认定存在违法行为，该公司少缴税款达16591280.31元，罚 款金额为8295640.21元。潮新闻记者查询发现，"周周珍可爱625"实名信息"周珍"，在该平台拥有5044.7万粉丝，账号认证为吉尼斯水乳精华销量王、平台 每经编辑｜陈柯名 据潮新闻，12月10日，有网友反映，某短视频平台主播"周周珍可爱625"（实名周珍）名下控股企业涉嫌逃税，已被国家税务总局佛山市税务局查处，涉 及金额逾1600万元。 经核对，与网友所提供的信息基本一致，广东嘉星文化传媒有限公司逃避缴纳税款，存在账簿上不列或少列收入的违法事实。 行，近7天热卖商品超10万件。 店铺公示的营业执照显示主体为广东嘉星投资集团有限公司。天眼查信息显示，广东嘉星文化传媒有限公司成立于2019年11月，周珍曾持有91.6667%股 份，并于2023年2月28日退出，目前由广东嘉星投资集团有限公司100%控股。周珍担任广东嘉星投资 ...

Core Points - The investigation revealed that Hebei Chuming Cultural Media Co., Ltd., a Multi-Channel Network (MCN) with 170 hosts, had zero personal income tax withheld over three years despite reporting total income of 160 million yuan [1][2][4] - The company engaged in tax evasion by issuing false invoices and improperly claiming tax benefits, resulting in a total tax shortfall of 12.6151 million yuan [1][11] - The investigation led to the discovery of collusion with a technology company in Yiwu, which issued inflated invoices, further complicating the tax evasion scheme [6][9][11] Group 1 - The MCN institution reported a total income of 160 million yuan from 2019 to 2021, yet had an average annual salary expenditure of only 720,000 yuan [4][5] - The company failed to withhold personal income tax for its hosts, which is a legal requirement under Chinese tax law [2][11] - The investigation uncovered that over half of the MCN's input invoices were issued by a company suspected of fraudulent invoicing [4][5][6] Group 2 - The MCN's legal representative admitted to using false invoices to inflate expenses and reduce taxable income, allowing the company to qualify for small-scale enterprise tax benefits [11][12] - The company was found to have issued 447 fraudulent invoices totaling 44.638 million yuan, which were used to evade taxes [9][13] - The tax authorities have initiated legal proceedings against the MCN and the associated technology company for their involvement in tax fraud [13]

Group 1 - The article discusses tax violations by MCN institutions, specifically highlighting cases involving Hebei Chuming Cultural Media Co., Ltd. and Hunan Yanke Cultural Media Co., Ltd. [1][13] - Hebei Chuming Cultural Media Co., Ltd. was found to have issued false invoices, resulting in tax evasion of 12.6151 million yuan, and failed to withhold personal income tax for its 170 streamers, amounting to 3.597 million yuan [1][10] - The tax authority imposed a total penalty of 20.1006 million yuan on Hebei Chuming Cultural Media Co., Ltd. and referred the case to law enforcement for further investigation [12] Group 2 - Hunan Yanke Cultural Media Co., Ltd. was penalized for failing to withhold personal income tax for its streamers, leading to a tax shortfall of 2.0886 million yuan [13][18] - The tax authority imposed a fine of 1.0443 million yuan on Hunan Yanke Cultural Media Co., Ltd. and provided guidance to the affected streamers for tax compliance [18][19] Group 3 - The article also covers the case of streamer Li Chengxiang, who concealed income and evaded taxes amounting to 2.435 million yuan through false declarations [20][24] - Li Chengxiang's online store had a significant discrepancy between reported sales and actual income, with an estimated sales figure of over 70 million yuan compared to reported tax sales of 694.60 thousand yuan [21][24] - The tax authority determined that Li Chengxiang's actual tax liability was 1.6864 million yuan based on evidence gathered during the investigation [23][24]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of accurate and legal invoicing practices, highlighting the potential legal consequences of tax violations and the necessity for businesses to adhere to tax regulations [10][12][14]. Group 1: Invoicing Guidelines - When issuing invoices, it is crucial to ensure that all information is complete, truthful, and accurate, including buyer information and the actual service or product name [10]. - Businesses must select the correct tax rate based on their taxpayer status, and verify the total amount for accuracy [10]. - Invoices must not contain false information, such as misrepresenting the nature of the goods or services provided [10][12]. Group 2: Common Issues and Solutions - If a customer forgets to request an invoice after a transaction, it can still be issued as long as the transaction is genuine [11]. - Businesses should firmly refuse unreasonable requests from customers, such as altering invoice amounts or descriptions, as these actions constitute tax violations [12]. - After issuing an invoice, businesses can deliver it to consumers through various methods, including email or QR code [13]. Group 3: Compliance and Legal Boundaries - Businesses must avoid practices such as issuing invoices without real transactions, misclassifying personal expenses as business expenses, and refusing to issue invoices for any reason [14]. - The article references specific regulations and guidelines from the National Taxation Bureau regarding invoice management and penalties for violations [15].

Group 1 - The article discusses the criteria for taxpayers to be directly rated as D-level in the current evaluation year [4] - Taxpayers can be rated D-level if they engage in tax-related crimes such as tax evasion, fraudulent export tax refunds, or issuing false VAT invoices [4] - Specific behaviors leading to a D-level rating include failing to pay taxes or penalties within the stipulated time, using violence to refuse tax payments, and providing false materials to obtain tax benefits [4] Group 2 - The article outlines that a taxpayer can be rated D-level if they have a record of serious tax violations or are associated with individuals who are already rated D-level [4] - It emphasizes the importance of compliance with tax regulations to avoid severe penalties and loss of tax credit ratings [4]

Group 1 - The company in question, Binzhou Haoyuan Accounting Firm, has been found to have concealed sales revenue, leading to a tax payment of only 11,400 yuan since its establishment in June 2020, despite handling over 1,200 clients [1][2] - The tax authority, Binzhou Taxation Bureau, conducted an investigation and determined that the company had hidden 2,990,700 yuan in sales revenue from 2021 to 2023, resulting in a total penalty of 201,800 yuan, including back taxes and late fees [1][2] - The investigation revealed that the company often recorded service fees in cash and had significant cash transactions with a shareholder, Zhang, who received 7,996,300 yuan in total, with 5,005,600 yuan transferred to the company's account as reported sales income [2] Group 2 - The company has been operating at a loss since its inception, which raises questions about its financial practices and tax compliance [1] - The tax authority emphasized the importance of integrity in tax-related intermediary operations during discussions with the company's legal representative, who ultimately admitted to the wrongdoing [2] - The case highlights potential issues within the accounting industry regarding transparency and compliance with tax regulations [1][2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a significant tax evasion case involving a network anchor management agency in Guangdong, which has been implicated in fraudulent activities including issuing fake invoices and aiding tax evasion for over 700 anchors [2]. Group 1: Case Details - The Guangdong Huizhou Gaofushai Cultural Media Co., Ltd. was found to have issued 1,196 fake invoices totaling 226 million yuan, resulting in over 32 million yuan in personal income tax evasion for more than 700 anchors [2]. - The company also failed to pay approximately 21 million yuan in various taxes, indicating a serious breach of tax regulations [2]. - The tax evasion activities included avoiding personal income tax withholding obligations and collaborating with illegal intermediaries to fraudulently obtain local subsidies [2]. Group 2: Impact on Industry - This case underscores the challenges within the MCN (Multi-Channel Network) industry, which serves as a crucial intermediary between live streaming platforms and network anchors [2]. - The actions of this company have disrupted tax collection order and undermined fair competition in the market, raising concerns about regulatory compliance within the industry [2].

Core Viewpoint - The tax authorities have intensified efforts to expose tax evasion cases, sending a clear signal to the market about the importance of maintaining tax order and social justice [1][2] Group 1: Tax Evasion Cases - Various methods of tax evasion have been reported, including online streamers using shell companies to evade personal income tax and exporters using multiple shell companies to avoid paying value-added tax [1] - A clothing accessory factory sold a property worth tens of millions at a significant discount, using "yin-yang contracts" to hide income and evade taxes [1] Group 2: Tax Compliance and Benefits - The tax authorities are promoting a more law-based tax environment, which supports taxpayers and imposes stricter controls on tax violations [1][2] - In 2024, small and micro enterprises benefited from "bank-tax interaction," securing over 745,000 loans totaling more than 3 trillion yuan, reflecting a 7.8% year-on-year increase [2] Group 3: Importance of Integrity - Integrity is emphasized as a core competitive advantage, with tax evasion linked to broader issues such as the sale of counterfeit products and harm to national and consumer interests [2] - Companies and individuals are encouraged to focus on innovation and value creation rather than engaging in tax evasion, as short-term gains can hinder long-term development [2]