据了解，作为招商基金今年新上市的两只红利品种，中证红利质量ETF及港股红利低波ETF产品特色均较突出。 其中，中证 红利质量ETF（159209）聚焦"红利+质量"策略因子，优选消费、医药等赛道中基本面优质的标的，且不包含银行股，为目 前市场上较为稀缺的红利质量ETF资产，兼具防御性与成长潜力。 港股红利低波ETF（520550）则跟踪恒生港股通高股息低波动指数，采用"高股息+低波动"双因子筛选，重点配置港股金 融、公用事业等防御性板块。该指数当前股息率超6%，叠加港股估值洼地效应及央企分红政策加持，凸显抗波动特性。 值得注意的是，根据基金合同，两只ETF均采取月度评估分红，以及管理费+托管费20BP的综合费率，在当前分红大趋势 下，为投资者提供了低成本、相对稳定分红的布局选择。 市场层面，9月以来市场进入震荡调整阶段，短期避险情绪有所升温，部分资金转向A股及港股的红利资产。以中证红利质 量ETF（159209）为例，该ETF近两日累计获2764万元资金净申购买入。 9月10日，招商旗下两只月度评估分红的ETF产品同期发布9月分红公告，其中中证红利质量ETF（159209）迎来本年度第三 次分红，分红比例为0 ...

Core Viewpoint - The new "National Nine Articles" policy emphasizes the importance of dividends for listed companies, leading to a transformation in the evaluation system of corporate profitability, where dividend capability becomes a key indicator of corporate governance and profitability [2] Group 1: Dividend Investment Strategy - The dividend investment strategy is gaining recognition among investors as an important path for long-term and value investing, with high dividend assets becoming a new consensus in the market [2] - From a medium to long-term perspective, dividend assets still represent a high cost-performance ratio in the current market [2] - Traditional dividend sectors such as banking, coal, and electricity are experiencing trading congestion due to significant prior gains and limited growth expectations, making stock prices more sensitive to marginal changes [2] Group 2: Quality Factor and Index Performance - The "dividend + quality" strategy focuses on high-quality, low-congestion sectors, with the effectiveness of quality factors becoming more pronounced as market risk appetite gradually recovers [2] - The CSI Dividend Quality Index shows a more balanced allocation, with a single industry weight cap of 20%, and the top three industries being food and beverage, non-ferrous metals, and automobiles, contrasting with traditional dividend indices where banking stocks exceed 50% weight [2][4] - The CSI Dividend Quality Index has demonstrated superior profitability quality, with an average ROE of 4.13% at the end of Q1, significantly higher than the CSI Dividend Index (2.36%) and the low-volatility dividend index (2.40%) [5] Group 3: Performance Comparison - Despite the significant contribution of the banking sector to traditional dividend indices, the CSI Dividend Quality Index has outperformed major broad-based dividend indices even without banking stocks, showcasing stronger aggressiveness [5] - Over a longer period, the CSI Dividend Quality Index has significantly outperformed both the CSI Dividend Index and the low-volatility dividend index, validating the effectiveness of the quality factor [5] - Year-to-date performance shows the CSI Dividend Quality Index at 4.68%, the CSI Dividend Index at 8.50%, and the low-volatility dividend index at 16.75% [6]