"纽伦堡审判明确反对纳粹主义、极端民族主义和军国主义，同雅尔塔会议、东京审判等重要历史 事件一道奠定了战后国际秩序。"俄联邦委员会（议会上院）信息政策与媒体互动委员会主席普什科夫 在接受新华社记者采访时说，纽伦堡审判确立的原则不应被忘记。 1945年11月20日，美国、苏联、英国和法国在德国南部巴伐利亚州纽伦堡市设立国际军事法庭，开 始清算德国法西斯对人类犯下的滔天罪行。包括纳粹政权二号人物、纳粹德国空军元帅戈林在内的24名 主要战犯受审，其中10人被送上绞刑架。 新华社莫斯科11月20日电（记者 黄河）为纪念纽伦堡国际军事法庭成立80周年，以"不受时效限 制：纽伦堡审判80周年"为主题的国际科学实践论坛20日在莫斯科开幕。俄各界呼吁铭记纽伦堡审判的 历史意义和原则。 俄总统普京在致论坛与会者的贺信中说，80年前，纽伦堡国际军事法庭对纳粹分子所犯罪行已经明 确定罪，追诉相关罪行"不受时效限制"。他强调，纽伦堡审判所确定的原则至今仍然适用，这些原则有 助于坚决抵制歪曲历史事实的企图，有助于应对当今全球挑战与威胁。 俄外交部长拉夫罗夫在视频致辞中说，纽伦堡审判对战后国际法律体系的构建意义重大。他强调， 西方如今更 ...

Core Points - The article discusses the complex historical legacy of Germany, particularly the duality of its cultural achievements and the atrocities committed during the Nazi regime, questioning how a nation that produced great thinkers and artists could also give rise to figures like Hitler [1] - It highlights the ongoing struggle of Germany to reconcile its past with its present identity, especially in light of rising populism and nationalism in Europe [1][5] - The narrative emphasizes the importance of collective reflection and the challenges of achieving a complete moral reckoning with history, suggesting that Germany's path to recovery is fraught with contradictions [1][7] Group 1 - The article reflects on the historical context of Germany's post-war reconstruction and the attempts to confront its Nazi past, noting that this process has not been entirely successful [1][7] - It mentions the significant investment in military capabilities announced by Chancellor Olaf Scholz, which has raised concerns about a resurgence of militarism in Germany [5][6] - The article discusses the perception of Germany as a model of post-war reconciliation compared to Japan, highlighting the symbolic gestures made by German leaders to acknowledge past wrongs [9][11] Group 2 - The text outlines the economic recovery of West Germany under Ludwig Erhard's leadership, which was characterized by a shift towards a social market economy that facilitated rapid growth [16][17] - It describes the political landscape of Germany in the 1950s, including the tensions surrounding NATO membership and the internal divisions within political parties regarding foreign policy [19][20] - The article notes the cultural transformation in Germany, where traditional authoritarian political culture faced challenges from emerging democratic ideals and social movements [22][23] Group 3 - The narrative addresses the resurgence of extremist political movements in contemporary Germany, particularly the rise of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has drawn support from a segment of the electorate despite its controversial ties to Nazi symbolism [7][29] - It discusses the ongoing debates around immigration and national identity, particularly in the context of the refugee crisis, and how these issues have reignited discussions about Germany's historical responsibilities [29][32] - The article concludes by questioning whether Germany's reconstruction is truly complete, suggesting that the nation continues to grapple with its historical legacy and the implications for its future [35][36]