日本首相高市早苗近期在国会答辩时公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，粗暴干涉中国内政，且不思悔改，拒不撤回错误言论。日本政府还频频为其错误言论强行 辩解。 非洲青年企业家协会南非负责人 伊姆拉姆：事实上（高市早苗）这样的言论是在无视二战后的相关承诺，这是令人担忧的事情。作为年轻一代，我们必须 对此保持高度关注，因为二战后国际秩序为世界带来稳定与自由，所以我们应该坚决反对任何带有军国主义色彩的或具有挑衅性的言论。我个人认为，应当 撤回相关言论。 科摩罗总统政治顾问 姆赛义迪：台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分，这是国际社会的普遍共识，并得到所有与中国建交的国家的支持。高市早苗的言论干 涉中国内政，这种干涉行为尤其是来自一个此前已就此问题作出明确承诺的国家，有可能加剧需要对话与稳定的地区的紧张局势。 南非学者 谭哲理：谈到日本在台湾问题上的行径，作为南非人，作为非洲人，我们都坚定奉行一个中国原则。 国际人士表示，这暴露了日本右翼势力的持续抬头和军国主义的阴魂不散，国际社会坚决不能允许日本军国主义死灰复燃。台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部 分，这是铁的事实，不容歪曲篡改。 白俄罗斯国民会议代表院人权、民族关系和新闻媒体委员会主席 布 ...

Core Points - The international scientific and practical forum titled "No Statute of Limitations: 80th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials" opened in Moscow to commemorate the historical significance and principles of the Nuremberg Trials [1] - Russian President Putin emphasized that the principles established by the Nuremberg Trials remain applicable today and are crucial in resisting attempts to distort historical facts and addressing current global challenges [1] - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov highlighted the significant impact of the Nuremberg Trials on the post-war international legal system and criticized the West for tending to "forget" the conclusions of the Nuremberg Trials and the lessons of World War II [1] - The Nuremberg Trials are recognized for opposing Nazism, extreme nationalism, and militarism, and are considered foundational to the post-war international order alongside other historical events like the Yalta Conference and the Tokyo Trials [1] Historical Context - The Nuremberg Trials were established on November 20, 1945, by the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France in Nuremberg, Germany, to hold Nazi war criminals accountable for their crimes against humanity [2] - A total of 24 major war criminals were tried, including Hermann Göring, with 10 sentenced to death by hanging [2]

Core Points - The article discusses the complex historical legacy of Germany, particularly the duality of its cultural achievements and the atrocities committed during the Nazi regime, questioning how a nation that produced great thinkers and artists could also give rise to figures like Hitler [1] - It highlights the ongoing struggle of Germany to reconcile its past with its present identity, especially in light of rising populism and nationalism in Europe [1][5] - The narrative emphasizes the importance of collective reflection and the challenges of achieving a complete moral reckoning with history, suggesting that Germany's path to recovery is fraught with contradictions [1][7] Group 1 - The article reflects on the historical context of Germany's post-war reconstruction and the attempts to confront its Nazi past, noting that this process has not been entirely successful [1][7] - It mentions the significant investment in military capabilities announced by Chancellor Olaf Scholz, which has raised concerns about a resurgence of militarism in Germany [5][6] - The article discusses the perception of Germany as a model of post-war reconciliation compared to Japan, highlighting the symbolic gestures made by German leaders to acknowledge past wrongs [9][11] Group 2 - The text outlines the economic recovery of West Germany under Ludwig Erhard's leadership, which was characterized by a shift towards a social market economy that facilitated rapid growth [16][17] - It describes the political landscape of Germany in the 1950s, including the tensions surrounding NATO membership and the internal divisions within political parties regarding foreign policy [19][20] - The article notes the cultural transformation in Germany, where traditional authoritarian political culture faced challenges from emerging democratic ideals and social movements [22][23] Group 3 - The narrative addresses the resurgence of extremist political movements in contemporary Germany, particularly the rise of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has drawn support from a segment of the electorate despite its controversial ties to Nazi symbolism [7][29] - It discusses the ongoing debates around immigration and national identity, particularly in the context of the refugee crisis, and how these issues have reignited discussions about Germany's historical responsibilities [29][32] - The article concludes by questioning whether Germany's reconstruction is truly complete, suggesting that the nation continues to grapple with its historical legacy and the implications for its future [35][36]