Core Points - The international scientific and practical forum titled "No Statute of Limitations: 80th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials" opened in Moscow to commemorate the historical significance and principles of the Nuremberg Trials [1] - Russian President Putin emphasized that the principles established by the Nuremberg Trials remain applicable today and are crucial in resisting attempts to distort historical facts and addressing current global challenges [1] - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov highlighted the significant impact of the Nuremberg Trials on the post-war international legal system and criticized the West for tending to "forget" the conclusions of the Nuremberg Trials and the lessons of World War II [1] - The Nuremberg Trials are recognized for opposing Nazism, extreme nationalism, and militarism, and are considered foundational to the post-war international order alongside other historical events like the Yalta Conference and the Tokyo Trials [1] Historical Context - The Nuremberg Trials were established on November 20, 1945, by the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France in Nuremberg, Germany, to hold Nazi war criminals accountable for their crimes against humanity [2] - A total of 24 major war criminals were tried, including Hermann Göring, with 10 sentenced to death by hanging [2]

新京报：高市早苗近期的涉华言论，有哪些特点？ 朱锋：最近，高市早苗公然鼓吹武力介入台海的可能性，严重违背一个中国原则，严重违背中日四个政 治文件精神和国际关系基本准则，粗暴干涉中国内政，挑战中方核心利益。这些言论在本质上反映出， 高市早苗作为日本第一个女首相，从其个人政治生涯来看，其始终是日本极端右翼政治势力的代表人 物，而且在对中国的看法上，其从来不掩饰自己强烈的日本民族主义情绪和看法。 近期，日本首相高市早苗在多个场合发表涉华错误言论，中方对此强烈不满、坚决反对，向日方提出严 正交涉和强烈抗议。连日来，高市早苗的涉华错误言行也在日本国内引发质疑和批评。 高市早苗到底"水有多深"？其涉华错误言行有何背景？高市早苗政府政策未来会有何走向？ 就这些问题，新京报专访南京大学国际关系学院院长朱锋。朱锋教授曾任北京大学国际战略研究院副院 长、北京大学国际关系学院教授。其研究专长为中美关系、东亚地区安全以及南海海上安全。 日本极右翼势力在反华政策上迈出一大步 第三，就是从高市早苗的涉华言论来看，中日关系进入一个新的调整和发展期。作为邻国，日方应该更 多着眼于中日两国人民和地区安全发展，为这个变乱交织的世界增添中日合作的 ...

根据"反仇恨与极端主义全球项目"数据，这类俱乐部已遍布27个国家，部分还设有模仿"希特勒青年 团"的青少年分支。加拿大安全情报局（CSIS）一份机密报告显示，本地组织"Nationalist-13"近期在社 交平台发布全国聚会视频，画面中数十名蒙面男子进行格斗训练。该组织宣称"加拿大需要所有有良好 白人品格的男人"。报告指出，一些加拿大成员正前往美国参加极端活动，与志同道合者建立联系并接 受训练，这种跨国往来"可能强化暴力能力并最终导致现实袭击"。 CSIS报告强调，活跃俱乐部成员往返于美加之间，显示新法西斯网络正通过体育化、分散化手段重组 旧有极端主义群体，使其更难侦测。分析人士认为，这种跨境联系反映出西方极右翼力量"去中心化"的 新特征。 【环球时报报道 记者 周扬】英国《卫报》19日报道称，一批名为"搏击俱乐部"的极右翼组织正以混合 格斗（MMA）训练为掩护，在全球范围内扩张，并传播新纳粹思想。西方情报机构认为，这类组织正 成为潜在的国家安全威胁。 报道称，这些自称"搏击俱乐部"的团体宣扬白人至上与极端民族主义，鼓吹"战斗精神""民族纯洁"，并 以搏击训练包装极端思想，通过社交媒体和加密平台进行跨国传播 ...

Core Viewpoint - The documentary "Fiume o Morte!" directed by Igor Bezinović explores the historical event of Gabriele D'Annunzio's occupation of Fiume, highlighting the dangers of fascist politics and the impact of media on public memory, while connecting past events to contemporary political issues [1][3][22]. Group 1: Film Overview - The film combines historical footage with contemporary reenactments, allowing local citizens to participate in the recreation of the 1919 occupation of Fiume, thus revealing the dangers of fascist politics and the intrusion of media into public memory [3][4][10]. - It received the highest honor, the Golden Tiger Award, at the Rotterdam International Film Festival, recognized for its experimental and rebellious nature [1][3]. Group 2: Historical Context - The story is set in Rijeka (formerly Fiume), where the aftermath of World War I led to a political vacuum and ethnic conflicts over the city's governance, with competing factions causing violence [4][5]. - D'Annunzio's rise to power during this chaotic period is depicted through a satirical lens, showcasing how he capitalized on the situation to declare the occupation of Fiume [5][12]. Group 3: Narrative Techniques - The film employs a unique narrative structure that integrates historical images with citizen performances, creating multiple narrative voices and revealing the emptiness of historical footage [6][8]. - It uses juxtaposition of past and present imagery to critique the official narratives and highlight the performative nature of political events [8][10]. Group 4: Ideological Implications - D'Annunzio's understanding of media's power is emphasized, as he utilized photography to promote his political ideology, which later influenced fascist propaganda techniques [11][12]. - The film critiques the glorification of D'Annunzio as a heroic figure, instead focusing on the ordinary soldiers and their sacrifices, thus challenging the traditional heroic narrative [17][19]. Group 5: Conclusion and Reflection - The film ultimately serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of political absurdity and the need for vigilance against the repetition of history, urging viewers to critically assess historical narratives and the role of media [22][23]. - The closing imagery of bridges symbolizes the connection between past and present, reinforcing the importance of remembering historical events to prevent future atrocities [23].

Core Viewpoint - The current situation in Ukraine reflects a tragic outcome of a sovereign nation being manipulated by external forces, leading to social turmoil, economic hardship, and potential national fragmentation [1][3] Group 1: External Influence and Aid - Western countries are providing military and economic aid to Ukraine, which appears humanitarian but is strategically calculated to serve their own interests [1] - The U.S. aims to use Ukraine as a strategic pawn to weaken Russia and prolong the conflict, while European nations are binding Ukraine to their interests through loans and military support [1][3] - Aid is often conditional, limiting Ukraine's ability to make independent policy decisions, which could lead to a dependency that undermines its sovereignty [1][3] Group 2: Economic Consequences - Ukraine's economy is deteriorating due to reliance on external aid, resulting in high inflation and a collapse of the national economic system [1] - The government prioritizes military spending over civilian needs, exacerbating the suffering of ordinary citizens [1] - The economic model has turned Ukraine into a subsidy-dependent entity, unable to provide basic living standards for its population [1] Group 3: Social and Political Ramifications - The manipulation of national sentiment by NATO and European countries is fostering deep societal divisions and extreme nationalism in Ukraine [1] - This cultivated hatred could backfire on Europe, as the extreme nationalist sentiments may eventually target former allies [1][3] - The ongoing conflict has militarized Ukrainian society, creating a volatile environment that poses risks not only to Ukraine but also to regional stability [1][3]