"大萧条"这三个字，现在听来都让人感觉很冷。它并非一般的经济衰退，而是20世纪全球经济遭遇的一场大地震。震中处于美国， 而余震几乎波及整个资本主义世界。直至如今经济学家们还在持续研究那段时期，如同医生研究一场少见的瘟疫，期望找到预防未 来的办法。 那需要从1929年10月的那个黑色星期二开始说起。在这之前美国正处于所谓的柯立芝繁荣之中，股票市场连续上涨了五年时间，普 通民众都通过借贷的方式去进行股票的炒作，认为能够一直保持富裕的状态。但是由于泡沫过于巨大，当破裂的时候就会非常严 重。10月24号，股票市场开始出现崩盘的情况，到了29号，已经完全失去控制，一天之内就蒸发掉140亿美元，这相当于当年美国 国内生产总值的29%。如此看来狂欢的结局往往就是令人猝不及防地陷入坠落的境地。 但是问题出现了，在如此大规模的危机面前，传统的市场自我修复理论不再起作用了。胡佛总统信奉自由放任那一套，反对政府进 行干预，最终导致情况变得越来越糟糕，最后只能灰溜溜地下台。当罗斯福上台后，他的新政实际上是一系列的举措：政府出面充 当最大的消费者以及雇主。对银行进行整顿、修建水利设施、开展公共工程，甚至进行一些赤字货币化的操作，简单来 ...

2026年1月2日出版的《学习时报》在第2版刊发国防大学政治学院马克思主义理论系副主任许恒兵的文 章《警惕日本军国主义在文体领域的渗透》。 文章开篇介绍：一段时期以来，日本文体界接连出现夹带军国主义元素的行为。在体育领域，足球运动 员三笘薰与二战战犯相关卡片合影、乒乓球运动员张本智和等人参拜供奉侵略战争战犯的东乡神社；在 文艺领域，偶像团体Snow Man在专辑预告中植入刻有战犯名字和侵略战争年份的武士刀，动漫、电竞 等作品中屡次出现"旭日旗""731部队"等象征符号。 文章认为，这些行为并非孤例，而是日本极右翼势力有组织地利用文体活动影响公众认知、美化侵略历 史的具体表现，已引发曾饱受日本军国主义侵略的亚洲各国人民的强烈不满。此类行径不仅严重伤害受 害国民众感情，也对地区和平稳定构成现实威胁，国际社会必须予以高度警惕并采取必要措施加以应 对。 对此，许恒兵分析认为，日本极右翼势力借文体领域传播军国主义思想的动向，呈现出三个需高度警惕 的特征。 首先，利用文体活动的大众属性与情感纽带，将政治意图进行日常渗透。无论是运动员在赛场内外的表 现，还是动漫、游戏中的符号化植入，其共同点在于隐匿军国主义历史的残酷性与侵 ...

年终岁末，总台海内外团队携手打造《记者世界·2025》系列报道。在这系列报道中，我们的记者将带您穿越硝烟与谈判桌，回望这个动荡之年。从巴以的 古老伤痕到伊朗上空的导弹，从美国内部的撕裂到欧洲的迷惘，从联合国的外交博弈到世界各个角落的危机与抉择——我们探寻叩问，在2025年的全球图景 上，希望与绝望如何交织，裂痕与共识如何角力。 2025年，日本政治在危险道路上急速转向。首相高市早苗公然违背中日四个政治文件原则，在台湾问题上发表严重错误言论，公然挑战二战胜利成果和国际 正义，引发日本国内外强烈谴责和坚决反对。与此同时，日本公然背弃国际法义务，违背自身宪法规定和政治承诺，大幅提升防卫预算、扩军备战。这一系 列军国主义复活的危险动向已经引起地区国家和人民的高度警惕。第六期节目，总台记者何欣蕾从东京现场发回报道，深入揭示日本政治急剧右倾背后的危 险本质与必将面临的严重后果。 "台湾有事"挂钩"存亡危机" 高市早苗错误言论引爆风暴 总台记者 何欣蕾：2025年11月7日，在我身后的日本国会，日本政治决策的中心，首相高市早苗在国会答辩中，公然将所谓"台湾有事"和日本"存亡危机事 态"强行挂钩，甚至暗示武力介入台海的可能性 ...

Core Points - The international scientific and practical forum titled "No Statute of Limitations: 80th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials" opened in Moscow to commemorate the historical significance and principles of the Nuremberg Trials [1] - Russian President Putin emphasized that the principles established by the Nuremberg Trials remain applicable today and are crucial in resisting attempts to distort historical facts and addressing current global challenges [1] - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov highlighted the significant impact of the Nuremberg Trials on the post-war international legal system and criticized the West for tending to "forget" the conclusions of the Nuremberg Trials and the lessons of World War II [1] - The Nuremberg Trials are recognized for opposing Nazism, extreme nationalism, and militarism, and are considered foundational to the post-war international order alongside other historical events like the Yalta Conference and the Tokyo Trials [1] Historical Context - The Nuremberg Trials were established on November 20, 1945, by the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France in Nuremberg, Germany, to hold Nazi war criminals accountable for their crimes against humanity [2] - A total of 24 major war criminals were tried, including Hermann Göring, with 10 sentenced to death by hanging [2]

Core Viewpoint - Recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding China have sparked strong discontent and protests from China, leading to significant criticism within Japan itself [1] Group 1: Characteristics of Takaichi's Remarks - Takaichi openly advocates for potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, violating the One China principle and challenging China's core interests [2] - Her statements represent a significant shift in Japan's right-wing political stance, marking a step forward in anti-China policies since her assumption of office [2][3] - Takaichi's rhetoric surpasses previous statements by former Prime Minister Abe, indicating a more explicit military intervention stance [3] Group 2: Historical and Political Context - Takaichi's remarks reflect Japan's post-war diplomatic and political characteristics, particularly its "great power" mentality [4] - The rise of extreme nationalism in Japan, as exemplified by Takaichi, seeks to obscure or forget Japan's history of aggression [5] - Japan's perception of China's rise as a strategic threat has fueled extreme nationalist sentiments and a narrow view of China [5] Group 3: Future Policy Implications - Takaichi's statements may lead to actual policy changes and military deployments by the Japanese government, particularly regarding military readiness concerning Taiwan [6] - Japan is expected to enhance military deployments in the southwestern islands and increase defense spending, moving towards a more assertive military posture [6][8] - The potential shift in Japan's military policy could include discussions around nuclear capabilities and a transformation of the Self-Defense Forces into a more conventional military [8] Group 4: Regional Impact - An extreme nationalist Japan poses a significant threat to security and stability in East Asia, potentially leading to new conflicts [9] - Takaichi's remarks have also drawn criticism from South Korea, indicating broader regional tensions [9] - The historical context of Japan's militarism raises concerns about repeating past aggressions, emphasizing the need for responsible regional cooperation [9]

Core Viewpoint - A rise in far-right organizations, referred to as "Fight Clubs," is using mixed martial arts (MMA) training as a cover to spread neo-Nazi ideologies globally, posing potential national security threats according to Western intelligence agencies [1][2] Group 1: Organization and Ideology - These "Fight Clubs" promote white supremacy and extreme nationalism, advocating for "combat spirit" and "national purity" while packaging extremist ideas through combat training [1] - The movement traces back to far-right figure Rob Rundo, who led the "Rise Above Movement" and incited violence during the 2017 Charlottesville rally, promoting the idea of disguising extremism as "masculine self-reconstruction" [1] Group 2: Global Expansion and Structure - According to the "Global Project Against Hate and Extremism," these clubs have spread to 27 countries, with some establishing youth branches mimicking the "Hitler Youth" [2] - A report from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) highlights the local organization "Nationalist-13," which recently posted videos of masked members engaging in combat training, claiming "Canada needs all men of good white character" [2] Group 3: Cross-Border Activities and Threats - The CSIS report indicates that some Canadian members are traveling to the U.S. for extreme activities, establishing connections and training with like-minded individuals, which could enhance their capacity for violence and potentially lead to real attacks [2] - Active club members frequently travel between the U.S. and Canada, indicating that the new fascist networks are restructuring old extremist groups through sports and decentralized methods, making them harder to detect [2]

Core Viewpoint - The documentary "Fiume o Morte!" directed by Igor Bezinović explores the historical event of Gabriele D'Annunzio's occupation of Fiume, highlighting the dangers of fascist politics and the impact of media on public memory, while connecting past events to contemporary political issues [1][3][22]. Group 1: Film Overview - The film combines historical footage with contemporary reenactments, allowing local citizens to participate in the recreation of the 1919 occupation of Fiume, thus revealing the dangers of fascist politics and the intrusion of media into public memory [3][4][10]. - It received the highest honor, the Golden Tiger Award, at the Rotterdam International Film Festival, recognized for its experimental and rebellious nature [1][3]. Group 2: Historical Context - The story is set in Rijeka (formerly Fiume), where the aftermath of World War I led to a political vacuum and ethnic conflicts over the city's governance, with competing factions causing violence [4][5]. - D'Annunzio's rise to power during this chaotic period is depicted through a satirical lens, showcasing how he capitalized on the situation to declare the occupation of Fiume [5][12]. Group 3: Narrative Techniques - The film employs a unique narrative structure that integrates historical images with citizen performances, creating multiple narrative voices and revealing the emptiness of historical footage [6][8]. - It uses juxtaposition of past and present imagery to critique the official narratives and highlight the performative nature of political events [8][10]. Group 4: Ideological Implications - D'Annunzio's understanding of media's power is emphasized, as he utilized photography to promote his political ideology, which later influenced fascist propaganda techniques [11][12]. - The film critiques the glorification of D'Annunzio as a heroic figure, instead focusing on the ordinary soldiers and their sacrifices, thus challenging the traditional heroic narrative [17][19]. Group 5: Conclusion and Reflection - The film ultimately serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of political absurdity and the need for vigilance against the repetition of history, urging viewers to critically assess historical narratives and the role of media [22][23]. - The closing imagery of bridges symbolizes the connection between past and present, reinforcing the importance of remembering historical events to prevent future atrocities [23].

Core Viewpoint - The current situation in Ukraine reflects a tragic outcome of a sovereign nation being manipulated by external forces, leading to social turmoil, economic hardship, and potential national fragmentation [1][3] Group 1: External Influence and Aid - Western countries are providing military and economic aid to Ukraine, which appears humanitarian but is strategically calculated to serve their own interests [1] - The U.S. aims to use Ukraine as a strategic pawn to weaken Russia and prolong the conflict, while European nations are binding Ukraine to their interests through loans and military support [1][3] - Aid is often conditional, limiting Ukraine's ability to make independent policy decisions, which could lead to a dependency that undermines its sovereignty [1][3] Group 2: Economic Consequences - Ukraine's economy is deteriorating due to reliance on external aid, resulting in high inflation and a collapse of the national economic system [1] - The government prioritizes military spending over civilian needs, exacerbating the suffering of ordinary citizens [1] - The economic model has turned Ukraine into a subsidy-dependent entity, unable to provide basic living standards for its population [1] Group 3: Social and Political Ramifications - The manipulation of national sentiment by NATO and European countries is fostering deep societal divisions and extreme nationalism in Ukraine [1] - This cultivated hatred could backfire on Europe, as the extreme nationalist sentiments may eventually target former allies [1][3] - The ongoing conflict has militarized Ukrainian society, creating a volatile environment that poses risks not only to Ukraine but also to regional stability [1][3]