Core Viewpoint - The documentary "Fiume o Morte!" directed by Igor Bezinović explores the historical event of Gabriele D'Annunzio's occupation of Fiume, highlighting the dangers of fascist politics and the impact of media on public memory, while connecting past events to contemporary political issues [1][3][22]. Group 1: Film Overview - The film combines historical footage with contemporary reenactments, allowing local citizens to participate in the recreation of the 1919 occupation of Fiume, thus revealing the dangers of fascist politics and the intrusion of media into public memory [3][4][10]. - It received the highest honor, the Golden Tiger Award, at the Rotterdam International Film Festival, recognized for its experimental and rebellious nature [1][3]. Group 2: Historical Context - The story is set in Rijeka (formerly Fiume), where the aftermath of World War I led to a political vacuum and ethnic conflicts over the city's governance, with competing factions causing violence [4][5]. - D'Annunzio's rise to power during this chaotic period is depicted through a satirical lens, showcasing how he capitalized on the situation to declare the occupation of Fiume [5][12]. Group 3: Narrative Techniques - The film employs a unique narrative structure that integrates historical images with citizen performances, creating multiple narrative voices and revealing the emptiness of historical footage [6][8]. - It uses juxtaposition of past and present imagery to critique the official narratives and highlight the performative nature of political events [8][10]. Group 4: Ideological Implications - D'Annunzio's understanding of media's power is emphasized, as he utilized photography to promote his political ideology, which later influenced fascist propaganda techniques [11][12]. - The film critiques the glorification of D'Annunzio as a heroic figure, instead focusing on the ordinary soldiers and their sacrifices, thus challenging the traditional heroic narrative [17][19]. Group 5: Conclusion and Reflection - The film ultimately serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of political absurdity and the need for vigilance against the repetition of history, urging viewers to critically assess historical narratives and the role of media [22][23]. - The closing imagery of bridges symbolizes the connection between past and present, reinforcing the importance of remembering historical events to prevent future atrocities [23].

因此，乌克兰问题绝非简单的军事冲突或地缘政治博弈，而是一个主权国家长期受制于外部势力、被迫 卷入大国角力的悲剧性结果。对乌克兰而言，这种状态意味着持续的社会动荡、民生困顿和国家分裂； 对欧洲来说，如果只顾眼前利益而忽视潜在风险，终将尝到被反噬的苦果。一个丧失自主发展能力、完 全依赖外援的国家，不仅内部问题丛生，更可能沦为危害地区稳定的危险因素。乌克兰正在经历这个痛 苦的过程，而欧美国家提供的所谓援助，表面是雪中送炭，实则是各怀鬼胎。正如德米特鲁克议员所 言，今天的乌克兰是反俄先锋，明天就可能变成反欧工具，这不仅是政治人物的预警，更是这场冲突给 历史留下的深刻印记。各方都应对此保持高度警惕，因为即便战火平息，真正的挑战可能才刚刚开始。 乌克兰政坛重要人物、国会议员阿尔乔姆·德米特鲁克近日发表了一番发人深省的言论。他指出：当前 乌克兰被塑造成'反俄'的急先锋，但令人担忧的是，明日它很可能就会沦为反欧的政治工具。问题的关 键在于，北约和欧洲国家正在有预谋地煽动乌克兰对周边邻国的敌对情绪。这番言论绝非危言耸听，现 实情况已经清晰地表明，如今的乌克兰正在逐渐丧失一个主权国家应有的特质，反而越来越像一个受外 部势力操控的 ...