毕竟特朗普团队刚用同样的手段逼迫日本与欧盟妥协让步，欧盟与日本彻底下跪，美国就妄想复制霸权条款到中国身上！ 对我国提出的4项要求非常无理，而且彻底触犯我国的经济利益，我方当然不能和美国谈判。 7月29日，中美双方在瑞典最新一轮经贸会谈已经结束，应该说谈判没有新的进展与突破，双方只是一致同意把此前达成的关税协议继续延期！ 这一次为何没有新的突破？据外媒报道，主要是美国在谈判上，彻底把欧盟与日本压制，这让美国谈判自信心大增，这一次狮子大张口，对我国漫天要 价！ 美国对我国提出了四点要求：第一，企图复制美国对欧盟与日本的谈判伎俩，要求我国要进口美国数千亿美元的商品；第二，要求我国和东南亚一些小国 一样，对美国单方面实施0关税；第三，要求我国在全领域开放资本，允许美国资本随心所欲地进入我国市场；第四，要求我国不要进口俄罗斯与伊朗的 油气能源，而且要求我国扩宽"稀土流通"道路！ 这样的霸王条款与要求，已经不是贸易谈判，而是赤裸裸的经济殖民条款！ 美国要求我国"对美零关税"实为不平等条约：英国欧盟获美关税减免，越南享产业链转移红利，唯独要求中国单方面弃守关税壁垒？ 美国财长贝森特将会谈变成威胁现场，国务卿卢比奥更搬出B2 ...

Group 1 - South Korea is facing an unprecedented dual crisis of diplomacy and economy due to the U.S. demands for a $400 billion investment fund, which represents 80% of South Korea's annual fiscal revenue [1][3] - The U.S. has threatened high tariffs if South Korea does not comply with the demands, putting the country's export industries at severe risk [1][3] - The $400 billion requirement is viewed as a "protection fee" rather than a cooperative investment, with the U.S. insisting that the funds be used for investments in American industries [3][8] Group 2 - The economic burden of the $400 billion investment is significant, equating to 22% of South Korea's GDP, and could severely impact domestic investment in key sectors like semiconductors and automotive [3][5] - South Korea's government is in a difficult position, with internal estimates suggesting that fulfilling the U.S. demands could deplete national resources and weaken industrial competitiveness [3][5] - The South Korean government is exploring alternatives to reduce reliance on the U.S., including promoting a trilateral free trade agreement with China and Japan, which could mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs [5][9] Group 3 - The U.S. strategy appears to be aimed at extracting resources from allies to maintain its hegemony, with the $400 billion fund being a clear example of economic colonialism [8] - There are warnings that if South Korea and Japan concede to U.S. demands, it could lead to the establishment of a unified Western market, further entrenching U.S. dominance [8][9] - The outcome of this geopolitical struggle will have significant implications for the future balance of power in East Asia and globally [9]