据伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社报道，伊朗议会议长卡利巴夫当天在德黑兰向集会者发表讲话时表示， 伊朗绝不接受任何形式的"支配"，"并将始终与霸权和傲慢作斗争"。（记者：陈霄、沙达提） 伊朗多地民众4日举行集会，谴责美国霸权和以色列的侵略行为。 当地时间上午9时，包括首都德黑兰在内的多座城市开始举行集会活动，伊朗各界人士参与。在德 黑兰，示威者从地标建筑巴勒斯坦广场游行至前美国驻伊朗大使馆，沿途高呼反美、反以口号，挥舞伊 朗国旗，高举今年6月伊以冲突遇难者照片。示威者还焚烧美以两国国旗，表达对美以在伊朗及西亚地 区所犯"罪行"的愤怒。 ...

Group 1 - The recent trade negotiations between U.S. Treasury Secretary Besant and Chinese Commerce Representative Li Chenggang have attracted significant attention online [1] - Li Chenggang has been portrayed as a calm and rational figure, earning the nickname "China's 'Wolf Warrior' diplomat" from many netizens [3] - The incident reflects the intense nature of the U.S.-China trade war, indicating a new era of non-violent conflict that redefines human civilization [8][10] Group 2 - The misunderstanding during the negotiations was exacerbated by Besant's lack of political experience, having previously been a trade investment company owner [6] - The trade war is not merely an economic confrontation but a crucial step in China's anti-hegemonic strategy, aiming to resist U.S. pressure [14] - The U.S. has historically violated international trade rules, establishing a trade system that benefits itself while suppressing other nations [18][19] Group 3 - China's adherence to international trade rules contrasts with the U.S.'s aggressive tactics, as seen in various historical examples of U.S. actions against other countries [21][23] - The current trade war is characterized by China's breakthrough in discourse power and international influence, as exemplified by the global popularity of TikTok [26] - The U.S. must become increasingly unreasonable for China to effectively challenge its hegemony, with figures like Trump exemplifying this behavior [28][29] Group 4 - China requires U.S. dollars and high-tech chips, particularly for high-end industries, highlighting the interdependence between the two nations [35] - The U.S. maintains its global dominance through dollar policy and high-end manufacturing, while China must overcome technological and monetary blockades to achieve anti-hegemonic goals [39][41] - Recent actions by China, such as tariff increases and restrictions on rare earth exports, indicate a strategic move towards decoupling from the U.S. [47]

Core Points - The latest round of US-China trade talks in Sweden ended without new progress, with both sides agreeing to extend previously reached tariff agreements [1] - The US presented four unreasonable demands to China, including importing thousands of billions of dollars worth of goods, implementing zero tariffs, opening all sectors to US capital, and ceasing imports of energy from Russia and Iran [1][3] - The US's demands are viewed as economic colonialism, reflecting a strategy previously used against the EU and Japan [3] - The US Treasury Secretary turned the talks into a threat, insisting on halting energy purchases from Russia and Iran, which could destabilize China's energy supply and economy [5] - China's trade representative firmly rejected the US's unreasonable demands, indicating a strong stance against potential tariffs [7] - The US's threats of reinstating high tariffs are seen as ineffective, given the current economic conditions in the US [7] - China emphasized its control over 60% of global rare earth refining, which could be leveraged in response to US tariffs, highlighting its strategic advantage [9] - Trump's contradictory statements about China's market openness and strong attitude reflect frustration over the failed negotiations [9]