Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights a shift in public sentiment regarding gold prices, moving from impulsive reactions to a more structured understanding of market trends and rhythms [1][3]. - The discussions around gold prices have evolved from emotional responses about immediate buying opportunities to a focus on understanding the "rhythm" and "asset stability" [3][5]. - The documentary "Golden 72 Hours" is referenced as a significant influence, emphasizing the importance of maintaining clarity during critical time windows rather than chasing price extremes [5]. Group 2 - The public's approach to discussing gold has transitioned from questions about immediate buying urgency to considering the role of gold within their overall asset structure [5]. - This structural understanding reflects a maturation in market observation, where individuals differentiate between "heat" and "trend," as well as "short-term emotions" and "long-term logic" [5]. - The recognition of this cognitive growth in wealth perception is deemed more valuable than merely tracking price fluctuations, indicating a deeper understanding of investment strategies [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of marginal propensity to consume (MPC) and its implications for investment analysis, emphasizing the importance of understanding different consumer behaviors and their impact on consumption patterns and investment opportunities [2][3][26]. Group 1: Marginal Propensity to Consume - Marginal propensity to consume is a key concept in Keynesian economics, indicating the proportion of additional income that is spent on consumption [2]. - A higher MPC leads to greater returns on government investment, but the pandemic has caused a decline in MPC, resulting in lower economic multipliers [3][4]. - The stability of MPC is influenced by consumer psychology, lifestyle habits, and social culture, which can vary significantly among different demographic groups [20][21][22]. Group 2: Consumer Behavior Analysis - The article identifies two distinct consumer groups with different MPCs, which affects their spending behavior and investment implications [9][12]. - For example, two families with the same income can exhibit vastly different consumption patterns based on their spending habits, with one family being more conservative and the other more liberal in their spending [10][11][13]. - The differences in MPC among these groups highlight that consumption growth is not solely driven by income increases but rather by the spending behavior of those most willing to spend [13][15]. Group 3: Consumption Trends and Recovery - The article outlines the sequence of consumption decline and recovery, noting that high MPC groups tend to recover faster than low MPC groups during economic upturns [34][35]. - During the consumption downturn from 2020 to 2021, traditional discretionary goods were the first to be affected, while new consumption categories remained resilient until later in the downturn [31][32]. - The recovery process is characterized by a reversal of the decline sequence, with new consumption categories leading the recovery, particularly those associated with high MPC consumers [35][37].