综合竞争力排名

Search documents
2024年财险公司“13精”综合竞争力排名榜:平安、太保、人保均为AAA!(2025年第四期 总第六十三期)
13个精算师· 2025-06-26 10:35
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive evaluation of insurance companies, considering multiple indicators such as risk, profitability, development, and scale, rather than focusing solely on premiums or profits [1][10]. Group 1: Comprehensive Strength of Insurance Companies - The "13精" comprehensive competitiveness ranking for 2024 includes 30 companies, with five rated as AAA: Ping An Property & Casualty, Taiping Property & Casualty, PICC Property & Casualty, China Life Property, and Sunshine Property [5][18]. - The ranking is based on a revised evaluation system that now includes service capability as a dimension, reflecting the industry's focus on consumer rights protection [1][10]. Group 2: Industry Performance in 2024 - In 2024, the property insurance sector reported a premium income of 1.69 trillion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 5.6% [13]. - The net profit for 84 property insurance companies reached 605 billion yuan, marking a 23% increase year-on-year, attributed to growth in underwriting profit and investment returns [13][14]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - The "Matthew Effect" is evident in the industry, with major players like the "old three" (Ping An, PICC, and Taiping) maintaining significant advantages in both premium growth and profitability [16][18]. - Smaller insurance companies, particularly those with premium scales below 3 billion yuan, face challenges in profitability, with nearly 30% reporting losses [16][48]. Group 4: Key Performance Indicators - Ping An Property & Casualty has shown a stable growth in non-auto insurance premiums, with a growth rate exceeding 15% for three consecutive years [21][23]. - PICC Property & Casualty has the lowest comprehensive cost ratio among the "old three," while Taiping Property & Casualty has demonstrated rapid premium growth, particularly in non-auto insurance [31][41]. Group 5: Adjustments in Evaluation Criteria - The "13精" competitiveness evaluation system has undergone several adjustments, including the removal of the leverage indicator and the addition of service capability metrics, reflecting the industry's shift towards high-quality development [79][82].