当地时间6月25日，美国总统特朗普与乌克兰总统泽连斯基在荷兰海牙举行会谈。 据了解，会晤共持续了大约50分钟。这是特朗普4月以来，与泽连斯基的首次面对面会谈。据外交人士透 露，会谈内容可能涉及乌克兰拟采购的新防空系统、对俄制裁以及国际油价上限等关键议题。 泽连斯基表示，其与特朗普进行了一次深刻且富有成果的会谈，涵盖了所有关键议题。泽连斯基称，双方 讨论了实现停火与真正和平的路径，以及如何更好地保护乌克兰民众。 特泽会回顾： 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes 当地时间4月26日，乌克兰总统泽连斯基与美国总统特朗普在梵蒂冈进行了简短会谈。这是今年2月特朗 普和泽连斯基在白宫发生争吵后的首次面对面接触。 当天，泽连斯基在社交媒体上首次分享了他与美国总统特朗普会晤的细节。泽连斯基称这次会晤 "很 好"，并表示双方有时间一对一地讨论了诸多事宜。 综合自：央视新闻 责编：叶舒筠 校对： 王锦程 版权声明 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体 法律责任的权利。 当地时间2月28日，美国总统特朗普与乌克兰总统泽连斯基在白宫举行 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the news is the signing of the U.S.-Ukraine mineral agreement, which aims to establish a reconstruction investment fund to attract global investment into Ukraine [1][3][4] - The agreement allows Ukraine to retain ownership of all assets within its territorial waters and is jointly managed by the U.S. and Ukraine on a 50:50 basis, with no party holding dominant control [3] - The final agreement does not include any clauses regarding Ukraine's debt, contrasting with earlier proposals that suggested using the agreement as a means for Ukraine to repay U.S. aid [3][4] Group 2 - The signing of the mineral agreement is seen as a significant step in U.S.-Ukraine relations and may contribute to easing the ongoing Ukraine crisis [5] - Recent interactions between U.S. President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky indicate a willingness to continue dialogue, despite previous tensions [5][6] - The agreement is perceived as a strategic move for both parties, with Ukraine seeking security assurances and the U.S. aiming to leverage political advantages for economic gains [3][5]

Core Viewpoint - The agreement between the U.S. and Ukraine serves as a signal to the Russian leadership, indicating a united front against aggression [1] Group 1 - The U.S. Treasury Secretary, Janet Yellen, emphasized the importance of the U.S.-Ukraine agreement in the context of geopolitical tensions with Russia [1] - The agreement is intended to strengthen Ukraine's defense capabilities and economic stability, which could impact regional security dynamics [1] - This move is part of a broader strategy to deter Russian aggression and support Ukraine in its ongoing conflict [1]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between Zelensky and Trump at the White House ended in a heated argument, resulting in the cancellation of a joint press conference and the failure to sign a mineral agreement, indicating a significant shift in U.S.-Ukraine relations [1][8]. Group 1: Background of the Meeting - Zelensky's visit was initially expected to finalize a mineral agreement, but tensions escalated quickly during the discussions [1][2]. - Trump emphasized a diplomatic approach to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict, while Zelensky expressed frustration over past U.S. administrations' failures to prevent Russian aggression [2][3]. Group 2: Key Points of Disagreement - The core disagreement stemmed from differing priorities: the U.S. aimed to reduce financial involvement in the conflict while securing access to Ukraine's mineral resources, whereas Ukraine sought continued security assistance and reliable guarantees before agreeing to a ceasefire [6][7]. - Zelensky's insistence on the need for security guarantees was met with Trump's dismissive attitude, highlighting a lack of alignment on critical issues [7][9]. Group 3: Implications for U.S.-Ukraine Relations - The argument marked a significant deterioration in U.S.-Ukraine relations, with Zelensky being asked to leave the White House and the cancellation of the press conference indicating a serious diplomatic setback for Ukraine [8][9]. - The shift in U.S. policy could lead to increased skepticism regarding continued military aid to Ukraine, impacting its operational capabilities against Russia [9][10]. Group 4: Broader Geopolitical Context - The tensions between the U.S. and Ukraine may provide Russia with a more favorable position in negotiations, as a weakened U.S.-Ukraine alliance could embolden Russian strategies [10]. - The changing dynamics could also complicate Europe's role in the conflict, necessitating a reevaluation of its strategies and communications with the U.S. to maintain regional stability [10].