多国撤人、航母抵以 美国国务院2月27日批准其驻以色列使团非紧急必要人员及其家属撤离以色列。美国驻以大使赫卡比就 此表示，如要离开以色列，务必"今天离开"。加拿大等国近日纷纷建议本国公民立即离开伊朗。随着美 军最大航母"福特"号27日抵达以色列，观察人士认为，美伊战争风险急剧升高。 对于"福特"号卫生系统出现严重故障的报道，美国海军予以否认。美海军在一份声明中说，该舰相关系 统"在预期参数范围内运行"，未对战备状态和任务执行能力造成影响。"马桶堵塞事件被训练有素的相 关人员迅速解决，堵塞时间极短。" 另据以色列媒体报道，美军6架加油机26日从美国本土起飞，前往以色列特拉维夫市附近的本-古里安机 场。截至27日，美军已在以色列部署近20架加油机。 伊朗军方27日表示，将对美国的任何侵略行为予以"毁灭性"回应。伊朗迈赫尔通讯社援引伊朗武装部队 总参谋部发言人谢卡尔希的话报道说，美国的任何挑衅行为都将遭到伊朗武装部队"果断且毁灭性"的回 击。 谢卡尔希说，伊朗武装部队正严密监控美军和以色列在该地区的动向，并做好充分准备。他说，美军在 该地区的存在是"心理战、讹诈和霸凌"的一部分。他强调，"我们不是好战分子，也不惧怕 ...

知情官员称，美军参谋长联席会议主席丹·凯恩也出席了简报会。此前，特朗普已下令在中东地区大规 模增兵，并正考虑是否对伊朗发起军事行动。 此次简报正值美伊第三轮核谈判结束之际。美方一名高级官员称谈判"积极"，但未透露更多细节。伊朗 外长阿拉格齐表示，双方在部分议题上达成理解，但仍存在分歧，下一轮谈判将于下周举行，并将在维 也纳展开技术层面磋商。 当地时间2月26日，美国中央司令部司令布拉德·库珀上将当天向特朗普总统汇报针对伊朗的军事行动选 项。美军中央司令部司令是美军在中东地区级别最高的军事指挥官。这是自去年12月伊朗危机升级以 来，库珀首次向特朗普作相关简报。 美国副总统万斯当天则表示，即便特朗普考虑对伊朗采取军事打击行动，也"绝无可能"让美国陷入一场 持续多年的中东战争。万斯称，他本人一直是"对外国军事干预持怀疑态度的人"，并强调任何可能的军 事行动都将是有限、可控的，不会演变为长期冲突。（央视记者 刘旭） ...

其中一名消息人士说,凯恩尽管并不主张对伊朗发起军事打击,但会支持并执行特朗普作出的任何决定。 凯恩并非对军事行动持怀疑态度,而是对成功的可能性和一旦开启战端的后果保持"清醒且务实"的认 识。 报道还说,有关向伊朗发起军事打击,副总统万斯一直对其风险和复杂性存疑,但他否认反对军事打击计 划。国务卿鲁比奥则持观望态度,既没有强烈主张发起打击,也没有明确反对。 特朗普近期继续向伊朗施加军事压力,威胁发起打击。美国已在中东部署一个航空母舰打击群,预计第二 个航母打击群不久后部署到位。 先"小打"再"大打" 美国总统特使威特科夫22日接受福克斯新闻频道采访时称,特朗普很好奇,尽管华盛顿不断加强在西亚的 军事力量,为什么伊朗还未"投降"。伊朗外长阿拉格齐当日就此发文回应说:"想知道我们为什么不投降 吗?因为我们是伊朗人。" 美国总统特朗普当地时间23日在社交媒体发文,称美国媒体关于美军参谋长联席会议主席凯恩反对军事 打击伊朗的报道不实。特朗普称,自己"更希望(与伊朗)达成协议",但如果不能达成协议,对伊朗来说将 是"非常糟糕的一天"。 "百分之百错误" 特朗普23日称,有关凯恩反对美国对伊朗动武的报道"百分之百错误",并 ...

美国智库卡内基国际和平基金会中东问题专家阿伦·戴维·米勒认为，特朗普一系列举措让自己陷入"困 境"，除非伊朗让步，否则可能被迫卷入"自找的危机"。 报道还说，地区问题专家和美政府官员警告，若美国对伊朗发起新的打击或爆发更大规模冲突，伊朗可 能对在该地区的美军资产、美国盟友及能源基础设施实施报复。 美国总统特朗普23日在社交媒体发文，称美国媒体关于美军参谋长联席会议主席凯恩反对军事打击伊朗 的报道不实。特朗普称，自己"更希望（与伊朗）达成协议"，但如果不能达成协议，对伊朗来说将 是"非常糟糕的一天"。他同时强调，是否对伊朗动武，"最终决定权在我手中"。 据新华社 据英国《金融时报》2月24日报道，一名以色列情报官员透露，即使"福特"号航母打击群抵达伊朗，美 军目前的军事能力也仅能维持4至5天高强度空袭，或约一周低强度打击。 报道说，在持续对伊朗施压数周仍未获得实质性让步后，美国总统特朗普正权衡是否对伊朗采取更大规 模军事行动。 美国近期向中东地区部署了自伊拉克战争以来规模最大的军事力量之一。 ...

新华社伦敦2月24日电（记者 郑博非 于艾岑）据英国《金融时报》24日报道，一名以色列情报官员 透露，即使"福特"号航母打击群抵达伊朗，美军目前的军事能力也仅能维持4至5天高强度空袭，或约一 周低强度打击。 美国智库卡内基国际和平基金会中东问题专家阿伦·戴维·米勒认为，特朗普一系列举措让自己陷 入"困境"，除非伊朗让步，否则可能被迫卷入"自找的危机"。 报道还说，地区问题专家和美政府官员警告，若美国对伊朗发起新的打击或爆发更大规模冲突，伊 朗可能对在该地区的美军资产、美国盟友及能源基础设施实施报复。 美国总统特朗普23日在社交媒体发文，称美国媒体关于美军参谋长联席会议主席凯恩反对军事打击 伊朗的报道不实。特朗普称，自己"更希望（与伊朗）达成协议"，但如果不能达成协议，对伊朗来说将 是"非常糟糕的一天"。他同时强调，是否对伊朗动武，"最终决定权在我手中"。 报道说，在持续对伊朗施压数周仍未获得实质性让步后，美国总统特朗普正权衡是否对伊朗采取更 大规模军事行动。 美国近期向中东地区部署了自伊拉克战争以来规模最大的军事力量之一。美方已在伊朗周边部 署"林肯"号航母打击群，"福特"号航母打击群已到达希腊克里特岛。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article indicates that while the U.S. and Iran are signaling negotiations, the risk of U.S. military strikes against Iran remains high, with potential actions planned for late February [1][2] - President Trump has expressed a preference for an initial military strike against Iran in the coming days, aiming to compel Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons capabilities [1] - The potential targets for U.S. military action include the headquarters of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, nuclear facilities, and ballistic missile sites [1] Group 2 - The U.S. has deployed the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group near Iran, with the USS Gerald R. Ford strike group also en route to the region [2] - A new round of negotiations between the U.S. and Iran is scheduled for February 26 in Geneva, with Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif suggesting the possibility of a better agreement than the 2015 nuclear deal [2]

Group 1 - The U.S. is significantly increasing its military presence in the Middle East, with the deployment of the "Lincoln" aircraft carrier strike group and additional combat aircraft and missile systems, while the "Ford" strike group is also approaching the region [2] - Indirect negotiations between the U.S. and Iran have taken place, with two rounds occurring since early this month, but tensions remain high as military preparations continue [2] - Iranian citizens express skepticism about the U.S. commitment to negotiations, citing a history of broken promises and aggressive actions, which contributes to a prevailing sense of wariness among the population [1][2] Group 2 - The Iranian government is preparing for the upcoming Norooz festival amidst the backdrop of military tensions, with citizens hoping for constructive dialogue but fearing the potential for conflict [1] - The Iranian perspective emphasizes resilience and a commitment to resistance against perceived U.S. aggression, with citizens asserting that Iran would not be easily defeated in the event of war [2] - A new round of negotiations is scheduled to take place in Geneva on the 26th, indicating ongoing diplomatic efforts despite the military posturing [2]

Group 1 - A former CIA official warns that military action against Iran may occur within the next two days, despite ongoing diplomatic efforts [1] - The U.S. has reportedly decided to launch an attack on Iran soon, with strategic misdirection being a potential tactic to catch opponents off guard [1] - Military movements in the Middle East indicate emergency deployments rather than routine rotations, with personnel adjustments observed across various U.S. bases in the region [2] Group 2 - Iran expresses a conditional willingness to negotiate on reducing the purity of its enriched uranium under international oversight, while rejecting demands to export all materials [3] - Iran's representative warns that any attack would make regional facilities associated with hostile forces legitimate targets, highlighting the risk of rapid escalation [3] - Internal divisions within the Trump administration are noted, with some officials advocating for caution against military intervention while others support a more aggressive stance [4]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. is considering military strikes against Iran, with potential actions expected in the coming days, despite ongoing negotiations [1][3]. Group 1: Military Actions - The U.S. may conduct military strikes on Iran on February 23 or 24, as indicated by former CIA personnel [1]. - President Trump has expressed a preference for an initial strike followed by a larger military action in the coming months to compel Iran to comply with U.S. demands [3]. - Potential targets for the strikes include the headquarters of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, nuclear facilities, and ballistic missile sites [3]. Group 2: Military Deployment - The U.S. has deployed the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group near Iran, and the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group is en route to the region [4]. - The USS Gerald R. Ford was reported to be sailing in the Mediterranean Sea, south of Italy, and is expected to reach waters near Israel soon [4]. Group 3: Diplomatic Efforts - A new round of negotiations between the U.S. and Iran is scheduled for February 26 in Geneva, Switzerland [4]. - Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif stated that a better agreement than the 2015 nuclear deal is possible, while emphasizing Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy [4].

Core Viewpoint - The risk of U.S. military strikes against Iran remains despite signals of negotiation between the U.S. and Iran, with potential actions expected around February 23 or 24 [1] Group 1 - U.S. military action against Iran is still a possibility, as indicated by reports from former CIA personnel [1] - The timing of potential military strikes is suggested to be on February 23 or 24 [1]