最近，美国政坛爆出了一个大新闻，特朗普公开表示，将以严重失职为由起诉美联储主席鲍威尔。大家 可能觉得有点难以置信，特朗普的指控背后的核心原因居然是美联储总部翻修工程的预算超支，从最初 的19亿涨到了25亿。这件事表面看起来像是一个工程纠纷，但如果深入挖掘，就能发现这其实是美国行 政权力和央行独立性之间的一次正面冲突。 美联储总部的翻修工程，原本是一个技术性较强的问题。 根据公开信息，这笔超支的6亿主要用于清除石棉和处理土壤污染。起初，人们可能会认为这只是工程 管理上的失误，但后来发现，类似的历史建筑翻修超支现象并不罕见。毕竟，老旧建筑常常隐藏着很多 隐蔽的问题，而且建筑安全标准随着时间在不断升级，额外的支出也就变得理所当然。 那么，特朗普真的能起诉成功吗？很多人可能心存疑问，答案大概率是否定的。首先，美联储作为一个 独立机构，鲍威尔在履行职责时享有较高的司法豁免权。如果想要起诉他，第一步就非常困难。其次， 严重失职作为法律标准要求极高，像这样的大型公共项目超支，其实并不罕见，仅凭这一点完全无法构 成严重失职的标准。而且，在美国三权分立的框架下，法院一般不愿意介入行政机构与独立机构之间的 分歧，历史上类似案件中 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the escalation of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on various countries, particularly China and India, starting from January 2023, with tariffs reaching as high as 125% on Chinese goods [2][4] - The U.S. court ruled against Trump's tariffs, stating that the president exceeded his legal authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which does not explicitly grant the power to impose tariffs [3][10] - The ruling has significant implications for U.S.-India trade, as the tariffs on Indian goods could affect exports worth approximately $86.5 billion, particularly impacting textiles, gems, and pharmaceuticals [6][8] Group 2 - The Indian government is responding to the tariffs by promoting local products and adjusting tax rates to stimulate consumption, while also seeking to diversify trade relationships, including a free trade agreement with the UK [7] - The ruling also benefits China, as it allows for a potential stabilization of export activities, despite ongoing challenges in the manufacturing sector [7][10] - The long-term implications of the ruling highlight the limitations of presidential power regarding tariff imposition, emphasizing that such authority lies primarily with Congress [10]