葬礼期间，小布什夫妇与民主党籍前总统拜登夫妇坐在一起，哈里斯与共和党籍前副总统彭斯聊 天，身后还有分属民主、共和两党的前副总统阿尔·戈尔与丹·奎尔。按美联社说法，两名民主党籍前总 统克林顿与奥巴马也受到邀请，但当天未出席。 据美联社报道，特朗普与万斯均未受邀出席切尼葬礼。《华盛顿邮报》称，特朗普政府现任高官无 人出席。 《华盛顿邮报》这篇文章的评论区同样体现深度政治分裂。有人称，相较于当前的"让美国再次伟 大"阵营，"老牌建制派"共和党人在尊重美国价值观与传统方面与民主党人共识更多。还有人称，葬 礼"让人想起我们的过去，那时党派分歧可暂时搁置"。然而也有人说："切尼与女儿欺骗我们卷入一场 不必要的战争，这场战争杀死了成千上万的美国人，使成千上万的人终身残疾。"（海洋） 这是11月10日在美国首都华盛顿拍摄的美国国会大厦。新华社记者胡友松摄 新华社北京11月21日电 美国前副总统迪克·切尼葬礼20日举行，多名前总统、前副总统及国会前领 导人出席，但现任总统特朗普和副总统万斯未获邀请。美国《华盛顿邮报》刊文称，多名前领导人坐在 一起的画面唤醒人们对美国政坛"往昔时代"的记忆，至少以前共和、民主两党之间的争斗没有如 ...

Core Points - The longest government shutdown in U.S. history is causing significant shortages among air traffic controllers and ground staff, leading to widespread flight delays and cancellations across the country [2] - Travelers express frustration, emphasizing that only a resolution between the Democratic and Republican parties can alleviate the current travel disruptions [2][4][5] - The division within the government is highlighted as a major issue, with travelers calling for cooperation to restore effective governance and improve the situation [6] Summary by Category - **Government Shutdown Impact** - The ongoing government shutdown is resulting in a shortage of essential personnel in the aviation sector, particularly air traffic controllers and ground staff, which is causing numerous flight delays and cancellations [2] - **Traveler Sentiment** - Travelers are vocal about their desire for the government shutdown to end, noting that employees affected by the shutdown are not receiving their salaries, leading to widespread dissatisfaction [4] - There is a consensus among travelers that the political parties need to reach a mutual understanding to resolve the crisis affecting air travel [5] - The current political division is seen as detrimental, with calls for the government to work together to move forward and implement positive changes [6]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Senate failed to pass a temporary funding bill for the federal government, leading to a potential government shutdown that could become the longest in U.S. history, surpassing the 35-day shutdown from late 2018 to early 2019 [1] Group 1: Government Shutdown - The Senate's 14th attempt to advance a temporary funding bill, already passed by the House, did not receive the necessary 60 votes, resulting in an ongoing fiscal deadlock [1] - The record for the duration of the shutdown will be reset at midnight on November 5, 2023 [1] Group 2: Political Disputes - The primary contention between the Democratic and Republican parties regarding the temporary funding bill centers on healthcare spending, particularly related to the Affordable Care Act [1] - Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer stated that Republicans are responsible for the anticipated rise in healthcare costs, which could leave 4 million Americans without health insurance [1] Group 3: Emergency Funding and Public Assistance - President Trump attributed the shutdown to the Democrats, emphasizing that emergency funds for food assistance would only be released once the government reopens [2] - The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced the use of $4.65 billion in emergency funds for food relief in November, highlighting the urgency of the situation for low-income individuals [2] Group 4: Legislative Challenges - The inability of Congress to pass a new annual budget before the start of the fiscal year on October 1 has led to reliance on temporary funding measures [2] - Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell expressed hope for breaking the fiscal deadlock soon, acknowledging the prolonged suffering it has caused for the American people [2]

Core Points - The U.S. federal government has shut down for the first time in nearly seven years due to the Senate's failure to pass bipartisan funding bills, affecting hundreds of thousands of federal employees and halting services across various departments [1][3] - The White House's Office of Management and Budget has instructed government agencies to implement their "orderly shutdown" plans, with certain departments like the military and law enforcement remaining operational [1] Group 1 - The Senate Republicans plan to vote again on temporary funding bills on October 1, hoping to gain support from five Democratic senators without altering the proposed legislation [2] - The federal government typically relies on annual budget appropriations, but ongoing partisan conflicts have led to repeated attempts at temporary funding measures to keep operations running [2] Group 2 - The current government shutdown is part of a historical pattern, with over 20 shutdowns occurring since the 1970s, the last significant one lasting 35 days during Trump's presidency due to disputes over border wall funding [4] - Approximately 800,000 federal employees will face unpaid leave, and contractors will experience delays in payments, impacting low-income families and sectors such as transportation, travel, healthcare, and public health [4]

Core Points - The U.S. Senate failed to pass a temporary funding bill on September 30, leading to a likely government shutdown starting at midnight, marking the first shutdown in nearly seven years [1] - The core disagreement in the latest funding negotiations revolves around healthcare benefits, with Democrats advocating for enhanced healthcare subsidies and Republicans opposing these measures [1] - The inability to reach an agreement is attributed to ongoing partisan conflicts, with both parties blaming each other for the impending shutdown [1] Summary by Sections - **Government Shutdown Context** - The last and longest government shutdown occurred from late 2018 to early 2019, lasting 35 days due to disputes over funding for the U.S.-Mexico border wall during Trump's presidency [2] - **Funding Mechanism** - Federal government funding is typically derived from annual budget appropriations, which should be passed before the new fiscal year begins on October 1. However, due to intense partisan conflicts, temporary funding bills are often required to keep the government operational [1]

Core Points - The Democratic leadership in the U.S. Congress has requested President Trump to hold a meeting before a potential government shutdown, but Trump believes it will not yield any results [1] - The Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries expressed concerns over the Republican decision to shut down the federal government and noted the repeated refusal of Republican leaders to engage in bipartisan negotiations [1] - A temporary funding bill drafted by Republicans passed the House of Representatives with a narrow margin but failed to pass in the Senate, which is also controlled by Republicans [1] - The federal government funding is set to run out at midnight on September 30, and if an agreement is not reached, some government agencies will face a shutdown [1] - Both parties are blaming each other for the potential government shutdown and believe the other will bear the responsibility in the eyes of the public [1] - Federal government funding should come from annual budget appropriations, but due to intense partisan conflicts in recent years, Congress often resorts to temporary funding measures to keep the government operational [1]

Core Points - The protests in Los Angeles, sparked by immigration enforcement actions, have escalated into violence and unrest, with the National Guard and police clashing with demonstrators [1][2] - The situation reflects a broader political polarization in the U.S., with immigration issues being a focal point for partisan conflict between Democrats and Republicans [2][3] - Public sentiment is increasingly weary of the two-party system, with calls for a third party gaining traction among citizens [6] Group 1: Immigration and Protests - The unrest in Los Angeles was triggered by federal enforcement actions against illegal immigrants, leading to significant public protests [2] - President Trump ordered the deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles, marking a rare instance of such action without a state governor's request [2] - The protests have spread to other major cities, indicating a growing national issue surrounding immigration enforcement [1] Group 2: Political Polarization - The conflict has highlighted the stark differences in media narratives, with Republican-leaning outlets portraying illegal immigrants negatively, while Democratic-leaning outlets focus on the aggressive enforcement tactics used [3] - The political landscape is characterized by increasing polarization, with both parties using immigration as a tool for political leverage [3][4] - Experts suggest that the current political climate is leading to deeper societal divisions, with violence becoming a more common response to political disagreements [4][5] Group 3: Public Sentiment and Future Outlook - A significant portion of the American public expresses dissatisfaction with the current two-party system, with a recent poll indicating that 80.5% of respondents support the creation of a third party [6] - Many Americans feel that the political climate is deteriorating, with 72% believing that the civility of U.S. politics is worsening [5][6] - Concerns about the potential for increased political violence are growing, with historical comparisons being made to previous unrest [5][7]