对以上结论的解释是，发动机并非因缺陷而停止，而是由于飞行员意外关闭。结果，左发动机完全失去 动力，起落架无法正常工作。 遇难者家属对该调查结果表示强烈抗议，称"调查结果不可信"，要求公开驾驶舱录音、黑匣子和发动机 数据等，并立即前往原定于7月19日举行的公开发布会现场，要求取消发布会。调查委员会最终撤回了 现场新闻稿，取消了正式发布。 7月21日，南都记者获悉，韩国国土交通部航空铁道事故调查委员会近日向济州航空客机失事事故遇难 者家属通报中期调查结果。据悉，飞机遭遇鸟击后，左右两侧发动机均受损，但只有右侧发动机受损严 重，然而，飞行员在执行紧急程序时关闭了仍在运转的左侧发动机。遇难者家属及多个有关组织对该结 果表示强烈抗议，指其"试图将事故原因归结为飞行员的简单误判"，"正在逃避在跑道附近建设混凝土 基座等问题的责任"。 近日，韩国国土交通部航空铁道事故调查委员会在正式发布会前，向事故遇难者家属通报中期调查结果 表示，飞机遭遇鸟击后，左右两侧发动机均受损，但只有右侧发动机冒出火焰和黑烟，严重受损。当时 驾驶舱语音记录器（CVR）记录了飞行员的声音，"2号（右侧）发动机出现问题，需要检查"。 然而，综合其他记录 ...

国际航空运输协会总干事：赞扬印度和印度航空事故调查局发布详细、及时的印度航空事故初步报告。 ...

Core Insights - The preliminary investigation report by the Indian Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau reveals that both engines of the aircraft lost fuel supply shortly after takeoff, with a focus on the operation of the fuel switches [1][2][8] Group 1: Incident Details - The report indicates that the fuel switches for both engines were switched from "on" to "off" within one second, leading to the loss of engine power [2][4] - A "MAYDAY" distress signal was issued by one of the pilots during the emergency, but the report does not specify which pilot made the call [2][6] - The aircraft crashed approximately half a minute after the fuel switches were cut off, with the black box ceasing to record five seconds before the crash [4][5] Group 2: Pilot Information - The captain, Sumit Sabharwal, has over 15,000 flight hours, including 8,596 hours on the Boeing 787, while the co-pilot, Clive Kundal, has 3,403 flight hours, with 1,128 hours on the Boeing 787 [6] - Both pilots were reported to have received adequate rest before the flight and passed alcohol breath tests [8] Group 3: Investigation Focus - The investigation is narrowing down on the operation of the fuel switches, with experts suggesting that the switches could not have been accidentally activated [8] - The final analysis report may take several months to complete, as the investigation continues to gather additional evidence [9]

Group 1 - The investigation into the Jeju Air plane crash has led to the filing of charges against 15 individuals for professional negligence resulting in death and injury [1][2] - The crash occurred on December 29, 2024, when Jeju Air flight 7C2216, carrying 181 people, overshot the runway at Muan International Airport, resulting in 179 fatalities [2][3] - Preliminary reports indicate that the aircraft's black boxes stopped recording shortly before the crash, with the plane approaching the runway at a speed of approximately 298 km/h and colliding with a concrete base [2][3] Group 2 - Factors contributing to the crash include the failure of reverse thrust after landing, a short runway, and inadequate airport response [3] - Issues identified at the airport included the presence of obstacles at the runway's end and insufficient ground rescue response [3]

Core Points - A Boeing 787-8 aircraft crashed in Ahmedabad, India, resulting in 241 fatalities among the 242 onboard, with one survivor [1][3] - The crash occurred shortly after takeoff, with the aircraft losing signal at an altitude of 625 feet (approximately 190 meters) [3][5] - The sole survivor, Vishwas Kumar Ramesh, was seated near the emergency exit and managed to call his father after the crash [5][7] - The black box of the aircraft has been recovered, and preliminary data indicates potential issues with the landing gear system during takeoff [5][7] - Boeing has expressed its willingness to cooperate fully with the investigation led by the Indian aviation authorities [5][7] - This incident marks the first fatal accident involving the Boeing 787-8 model, which has been in service for over 11 years [7] - Following the crash, Boeing's stock price fell by 8% in pre-market trading [7] Industry Impact - The crash has raised concerns regarding the safety record of the Boeing 787 series, which has transported over 1 billion passengers in less than 14 years [7] - The incident has prompted international condolences from various leaders and organizations, highlighting the global impact of aviation safety [8][10]