广东证监局表示，投资者是资本市场发展之本，保护投资者关系人民群众切身利益，是资本市场践行以 人民为中心发展理念的直接体现。近年来，广东证监局紧紧围绕打击证券违法犯罪、支持投资者维权救 济、构建全方位"大投保"协同网络三个重点，谋划布局辖区投资者保护工作，努力为投资者提供更为实 质的公平保护。本次签署合作备忘录，拟定4个方面、12项落实举措，旨在发挥行政与司法合力，使 《关于严格公正执法服务保障资本市场高质量发展的指导意见》在广东辖区落实落地，既是落实党中 央、国务院关于保护投资者决策部署的务实举措，更是新形势下深化辖区合作、携手推进法治建设的重 要标志。 近年来，广州中院聚焦资本市场高质量发展，充分发挥金融审判职能，在完善证券纠纷多元化解机制、 维护投资者合法权益、防范化解资本市场风险等方面持续发力，取得积极成效。从2023年开始，广州中 院探索构建证券虚假陈述"示范判决+测算前置+全程调解+合并审理+普通代表人诉讼""五位一体"解纷 机制，真正实现了多方共赢，1127名投资者诉前直接获赔1.1亿元，节省诉讼费用200余万元；上市公司 通过和解有序赔付，将纠纷对商誉及经营的影响降至最低。"五位一体"解纷机制获 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Gansu Provincial High People's Court and the Gansu Securities Regulatory Bureau have convened a meeting to promote the implementation of guidelines aimed at ensuring fair law enforcement and judicial support for the high-quality development of the capital market [1][2]. Group 1: Meeting Objectives and Discussions - The meeting emphasized the importance of enhancing the synergy between financial judiciary and regulatory bodies to improve the resolution of securities disputes [1][2]. - Participants discussed the functionality of the "total-to-total" online mediation mechanism and agreed on the need for a regular communication and information-sharing mechanism to consolidate dispute resolution efforts [1][2]. Group 2: Investor Protection and Judicial Services - The meeting highlighted the necessity of protecting investors' rights, including their right to information, participation in corporate governance, and fair market engagement [2]. - It was proposed to facilitate investors in legally safeguarding their rights by utilizing standardized civil litigation documents and online court services [2]. Group 3: Mechanism Optimization and Training - The meeting called for the optimization of the securities dispute resolution mechanism, prioritizing non-litigation solutions and improving the connection between online and offline mediation [2]. - There is a focus on enhancing the professional capabilities of financial judiciary and regulatory personnel through training to improve the quality and efficiency of securities dispute resolution [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the release of ten typical cases of diversified resolution of securities disputes by the Shanghai Financial Court and the China Securities Investor Services Center, aimed at protecting the rights of small and medium investors and promoting high-quality development of the capital market [4]. Group 1: Typical Cases and Their Significance - The ten cases highlight the importance of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms, emphasizing collaboration among courts, investor protection agencies, and mediation organizations to efficiently resolve collective disputes [4]. - The first case of special representative litigation in China showcases the court's commitment to holding companies accountable for securities fraud, resulting in a compensation of 285 million yuan for 7,195 eligible investors [7][8]. - The first case of a shareholder derivative lawsuit initiated by an investor protection agency demonstrates the effectiveness of holding key stakeholders accountable, leading to full compensation for the company’s losses [12]. Group 2: Innovative Resolution Mechanisms - The introduction of a comprehensive pre-litigation mediation commitment mechanism by the Shanghai Financial Court has significantly improved the efficiency of resolving disputes involving large private enterprises, achieving a 92% settlement rate [18]. - The use of a "demonstration judgment + professional mediation + judicial confirmation" mechanism in resolving disputes involving state-owned enterprises has resulted in a 98% settlement rate, showcasing the effectiveness of collaborative approaches [21]. - The integration of digital tools in resolving disputes involving delisted companies has led to an 85% resolution rate, balancing investor protection with the operational stability of companies [30]. Group 3: Cross-Regional Collaboration - The cross-regional collaboration in resolving disputes involving companies listed on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board has set a precedent for using demonstration mediation mechanisms, resulting in all 23 cases being resolved without entering litigation [23]. - The successful resolution of securities market manipulation disputes in the New Third Board through a dual-track mediation approach has established clear compensation rules and enhanced investor confidence [33].