Core Viewpoint - The maximum denomination of the Chinese currency, RMB, is 100 yuan, which has sparked discussions online regarding why it is lower compared to other countries that have larger denominations [1][3]. Group 1: Comparison with Other Countries - Japan's maximum denomination is 10,000 yen, South Korea's is 50,000 won, and Vietnam's is 500,000 dong, while Zimbabwe has an extreme maximum denomination of 10 billion [3]. - Zimbabwe's currency situation is highlighted as an example of excessive denomination, illustrating the absurdity of such high values in practical use [3]. Group 2: Economic Context of Currency Denominations - Large currency denominations are often linked to hyperinflation and historical economic conditions. Countries experiencing severe inflation must issue higher denominations to facilitate market transactions [5]. - Zimbabwe's economic struggles led to a vicious cycle of inflation and the issuance of larger currency notes, which further exacerbated the inflation problem [5]. - Japan and South Korea have also faced inflation at different stages of their economic development, influencing their currency denomination decisions [5]. Group 3: Historical Changes in China's Currency Denominations - China's currency denomination design has undergone several adjustments, with the maximum denomination previously being 50,000 yuan in 1948, which was later reduced to 10 yuan in 1955 due to improved economic stability [7]. - The maximum denomination was raised to 100 yuan in 1987, reflecting significant economic growth and increased consumer purchasing power during the reform era [9]. Group 4: Current Economic Stability and Payment Trends - China's stable economic development since the reform era has maintained price stability, making the 100 yuan denomination sufficient for everyday transactions [11]. - The rise of mobile payment methods, such as WeChat Pay and Alipay, has reduced reliance on cash, making the need for higher denominations less pressing [11]. - Increasing the maximum denomination could introduce complications, such as counterfeit risks and difficulties in making change, rather than providing convenience [11].