Core Insights - The cross-border e-commerce project by Sxianghui is identified as a scam that has defrauded over ten thousand individuals [2] Group 1: Scam Characteristics - The most apparent feature of the scam is the mismatch between the receiving accounts and the platform's main entity, with funds directed to unrelated companies [7] - The scheme promotes recruitment for rebates, resembling a pyramid scheme model [7] Group 2: User Guidance - Users who have invested money are advised to save all evidence, including order screenshots, chat records, and payment receipts, and to file complaints with payment platforms and report to the police [9] - It is emphasized that legitimate businesses do not require upfront capital to earn profits and do not rely on recruitment for income [9] Group 3: Market Behavior - The dynamics of the scheme suggest that early participants profit while later entrants risk becoming "greater fools" as the scheme collapses [10] - There is a psychological tendency among participants to ignore warnings due to the allure of potential profits, leading to regret only after the scheme fails [10]

Group 1 - The article discusses a Ponzi scheme in Cambodia, referred to as a "killing pig" scheme, which promises high returns of 1% to 4% daily and over 50% monthly [2] - The scheme is operated by a mentor named "Old Chen," who is attracting participants with the promise of professional management and capital protection [2][5] - The structure of the scheme includes an eight-level reward system for recruiting new participants, with rewards ranging from 588 to over 120,000 [3][5] Group 2 - The system used in this scheme is identical to that of a previous scheme called "Yameng Alliance," indicating a pattern of fraudulent operations [5] - Participants are warned against using retirement funds or borrowed money to invest, as early participants profit while latecomers become "bag holders" [5] - The article emphasizes the psychological aspect of greed, where individuals ignore warnings due to the allure of quick profits, leading to regret once the scheme collapses [5][6]

Group 1 - The article discusses the fraudulent practices of a lottery scheme, indicating that it has begun to exploit participants by "killing pigs" through financial manipulation [2] - It highlights the deceptive tactics used, such as promising guaranteed profits and requiring additional payments for account recovery after freezing [6] - The text warns that participants who join early may profit, but those who join later risk becoming "bag holders" as the scheme collapses [9] Group 2 - The narrative suggests that individuals are often blinded by greed, leading them to ignore warnings about the impending collapse of such schemes [9] - It emphasizes the notion that all participants are essentially "chives" being harvested by capitalists, with the underlying message that ignorance poses the greatest risk in investments [10] - The article advocates for a critical approach to financial markets, suggesting that understanding and mitigating risks is essential for success [10]

Core Viewpoint - The "Avira Entertainment Insurance" lottery fund scheme is being exposed as a potential scam, with internal team members quietly withdrawing and signs of imminent collapse [2][4]. Group 1: Scheme Characteristics - The project claims to be the world's first online insurance platform, utilizing blockchain technology and a public welfare fund, but these are merely marketing tactics [2]. - The scheme requires participants to enter specific rooms to place bets, with complex rules that are designed to confuse users [4]. Group 2: Warning and Advice - Online gambling and lottery schemes are often scams that lure individuals with promises of high returns, ultimately leading to financial loss [4]. - The company does not promote any projects and advises against investing money, especially retirement funds or borrowed money, in such schemes [4].

Core Insights - The recent exposure of insider chat records reveals a planned exit strategy by the ARK project team, indicating a fraudulent scheme disguised as a legitimate cryptocurrency project [1][3]. Group 1: Scheme Details - The internal chat records show the core team discussing a "final harvest" plan, with the project leader openly stating that "the last harvested investors are the most profitable," highlighting the deceptive nature of the project [3]. - The scheme is structured in three phases: first, the operators will buy in to create a false sense of short-term price increase; second, they will release "major positive news" through partner media to lure investors; finally, they will sell off at the peak to drain the funds [3]. Group 2: Blockchain Evidence - Blockchain monitoring data indicates unusual activity from large wallet addresses associated with the ARK project, including frequent small test transfers, which are often precursors to a scam exit [4]. - There has been a notable increase in the use of special administrative functions within the ARK smart contract, which allow for the direct transfer of fund pool assets, raising concerns about potential misuse [4]. Group 3: Market Manipulation - The current market downturn has led to a significant drop in ARK's price, with the project team likely aiming to exploit investors' desire to "buy the dip" by creating a false rebound as bait [6]. - Industry experts warn that any claims of "the bottom has been reached" could be smoke screens released by the project team, as such scenarios often precede a scam exit [6].

来源：震哥说盘 大家好，我是震哥。今天咱们来聊聊一个叫"聚富通"的股票跟单资金盘，这玩意儿说白了就是个杀猪盘，快崩盘跑路了，大家可得小心！ 震哥提醒大家：这盘现在全靠几个黑心团长拉人填坑，市场早不行了，崩盘就在眼前。投资有风险，别拿养老钱或借钱瞎投，守住钱包最实在。 这家伙冒充香港公司，用个假APP叫"富达"，吹嘘一键跟投就能日赚2%，群里天天洗脑跟单。震哥得说，这盘其实是缅北诈骗团伙搞的重启老套 路，导师叫老邓，托儿一堆，专坑新人。等你投了钱，他们一没新鲜血液就卷款溜了，最后人财两空。 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the sudden closure of the cash withdrawal feature by a short video cross-border e-commerce platform named "YouliLi," leading to significant financial losses for users who had invested in the platform [2] - The platform, which claimed to be from the United States, rapidly expanded and attracted millions of users within a few months before collapsing [2] Group 1: False Promises and Operations - "YouliLi" marketed itself with enticing slogans like "watch videos to earn dollars" and "zero-cost Amazon store setup, earn millions annually," which drew over a million users by 2025 [3] - The platform's claims of using advanced technologies like "S2K2C" business model and "HERO AI system" were found to be misleading, as the so-called intelligent product selection merely scraped unsold items from Amazon [3] - The digital avatars used for live streaming were generated by free AI tools, resulting in poor user experiences, with some users commenting on the low quality of the AI-generated content [3] Group 2: Warning Signs Before Collapse - The platform promised unrealistic high returns, claiming that C-class stores could earn 10% every 14 to 15 days, resembling traditional mutual fund schemes disguised as a short video e-commerce model [4] - On September 21, 2025, "YouliLi" announced a system upgrade without prior notice, halting all withdrawal functions indefinitely [5] - The operational team became unreachable by August 14, 2025, and the company was listed as operating abnormally, indicating potential issues with management [6] Group 3: Characteristics of a Ponzi Scheme - The operational model of "YouliLi" exhibited classic Ponzi scheme traits, such as enticing users with registration bonuses while imposing complex conditions for withdrawals [9] - High-interest rates were used as bait to attract investments, with a focus on recruiting new members to generate returns for earlier investors [11][12] - Once the influx of new funds slowed, the platform would use excuses like "upgrades" to shut down operations, leading to the disappearance of the controlling parties [14] Group 4: Identifying Similar Scams - The article emphasizes the need to be cautious of platforms promising returns significantly higher than market norms, as they are likely fraudulent [20] - A reliance on recruiting new members for income rather than actual business operations is a red flag [20] - Frequent use of buzzwords like blockchain and AI for marketing purposes, along with withdrawal restrictions, are indicators of potential scams [20]

齐鲁晚报.齐鲁壹点记者张磊常学艺 近日，山东德州市民张女士通过齐鲁晚报.齐鲁壹点情报站反映，称其在一个名为"九华黄精酒"的抢购平台上投资了十万元，不料平台于今年8 月突然关停，资金血本无归。据了解，该平台以抢购高价酒再寄售获利的模式为诱饵，承诺每日可获得1.5%的高额收益，实则是一场席卷多 地的"庞氏骗局"。初步了解，该平台在河北邢台有数个运营公司同时停摆，仅南宫一地的投资者或达上千人。张女士向记者讲述，今年5月， 她的朋友介绍其参与一个网站的抢购活动，主要商品为一款名为"九华黄精酒"的产品。"每天上午10点开抢，单价2万元左右。最吸引人的 是，买完后第二天就可以在平台上加价3%寄卖，几乎是稳赚不赔。"张女士表示，在帮朋友操作几个月并亲眼见证"收益稳定"后，她放下了戒 心。 "整个交易过程根本没有实物。"张女士强调，购买后不会有酒水寄来，而是由平台方通过蝙蝠APP(一款聊天工具)"联系对接买家"，买卖双方 线下完成资金交割。"每次交易后，商品价格都会上浮，去除给公司缴纳1.5%后，我们赚取的就是这个价差。" 平台暴雷后，由于参与者均是亲朋好友或熟人介绍，大量受害者开始相互联系。张女士、王女士等受害者发现除了自 ...

Group 1 - The rise of virtual currencies has led to financial innovation but also created a breeding ground for scams, with Ponzi schemes and fraudulent investment projects disguised as blockchain and decentralized high-yield investments [1] - Recent scams include "Xinkangjia DGCX" virtual currency fraud, "Xinlizhong" stock-following fraud, and "Blu Trading" virtual currency fraud [1] - The "Xinlizhong" stock-following project has collapsed, similar to the previous "Lianmou Investment" stock-following scam [6][2] Group 2 - Fraudulent apps like "Panmou Capital" and "Shengshu" have been reported, promoting high returns and requiring participants to download unregistered applications [2][4] - The "AIFEEX" virtual currency staking project claims to offer static returns on investments in AFM coins, promoting a multi-level dynamic return structure [14][16] - The "AAVE" blockchain bank project promotes high returns and uses a referral system, exhibiting characteristics typical of pyramid schemes [19][20] Group 3 - Various fraudulent apps, such as "Renmin Zhishang" and "Zhonghua Minsheng," have been reported, promoting fictitious high-yield investment projects and requiring participants to pay fees to withdraw funds [23][29] - The "STA" cross-border e-commerce project has been flagged for requiring participants to pay deposits and promising returns through a multi-level sales structure, indicating potential fraud [36][38] - The "Jinduan Club" and "Guangzhou Certain Cosmetics" scams involve participants paying large sums to join and promising high returns, showcasing the prevalence of pyramid schemes [42][43]