违规从事营利活动

Search documents
三堂会审丨出资假象难掩受贿实质
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-06-11 00:10
Core Viewpoint - The case involves Wu, a former leader of a state-owned enterprise, who engaged in corrupt practices by investing in a real estate project through relatives and receiving illicit profits, leading to serious disciplinary actions and legal consequences [3][4][10]. Group 1: Background of the Case - Wu served as the Party Secretary and Chairman of A Province Investment Company and Chairman of B Investment Management Company until his resignation in January 2021 [3]. - Wu violated integrity discipline by investing 3.08 million RMB in a real estate project through relatives, earning a total profit of 786,500 RMB from 2019 to 2021, with Wu personally profiting 418,600 RMB [3][4]. Group 2: Corruption Details - Wu and Zhang conspired to receive 10.14 million RMB from D Investment Partnership, manipulating the shareholding structure of B Investment Management Company to benefit themselves [4][5]. - They arranged for Zhang to take out a loan in the name of D Investment Partnership to cover their investment, agreeing to repay the loan with the investment returns, which was deemed a form of bribery [12][15]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The investigation into Wu's misconduct began on May 27, 2023, leading to his expulsion from the Party on November 27, 2023, and subsequent criminal charges for bribery [7][8]. - On February 5, 2024, the court sentenced Wu to ten and a half years in prison and imposed a fine of 2 million RMB for his bribery offenses [9]. Group 4: Expert Opinions on Misconduct - Experts argue that Wu's actions constituted a violation of integrity regulations, as he used his position to engage in profit-making activities that conflicted with his official duties [10][11]. - The nature of Wu's investment in the real estate project was scrutinized, with opinions suggesting it was a facade for receiving bribes rather than a legitimate investment [18][19]. Group 5: Implications for State-Owned Enterprises - The case highlights the risks associated with leadership positions in state-owned enterprises, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to integrity and anti-corruption regulations [10][20]. - It serves as a cautionary tale regarding the potential for abuse of power and the importance of transparency in investment activities within state-owned entities [20].
三堂会审丨准确区分认定分红款与受贿款
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-05-28 00:51
中央纪委国家监委网站 王李彬 特邀嘉宾 刘重稷 四川省南充市纪委监委第十三纪检监察室副主任 杨 梅 四川省南充市纪委监委案件审理室干部 林 燕 四川省南充市嘉陵区人民检察院检察官 【立案审查调查】2023年6月27日,B市纪委监委决定对王某某涉嫌严重违纪违法问题立案审查调查。 同年7月3日,经批准,对王某某采取留置措施。同年9月28日,经批准,对王某某延长留置时间三个 月。 【党纪政务处分】2023年12月13日,经B市纪委常委会会议研究并报B市委批准,决定给予王某某开除 党籍处分,并取消其享受的退休待遇。 罗泽民 四川省南充市中级人民法院法官 编者按 本案中,国家工作人员王某某投资30万元与兰某经营某砖厂,获取分红400万元及债权30万元,后又出 资290万元以兰某名义入股某公司陇南项目获取分红1293.4万元,相关行为如何定性?王某某在明知某 公司已不再吸收股本金的情况下,坚持以30万元债权追加"投资"到兰某处,并因此获取"分红"133.8万 元,该行为应如何定性?程某在兰某明确表示不愿意的情况下,提出追加30万元债权"投资",并事后告 知王某某的行为,能否认定为索贿?我们特邀相关单位工作人员予以解析。 ...