被告人吴存荣非法收受他人财物，数额特别巨大。 检察机关在审查起诉阶段，依法告知了被告人吴存荣享有的诉讼权利，并讯问了被告人，听取了辩护人 的意见。检察机关起诉指控：被告人吴存荣利用担任合肥市委副书记、市长，安徽省委常委、合肥市委 书记，安徽省委常委、副省长，重庆市委常委、副市长，重庆市委副书记，重庆市人大常委会党组副书 记、副主任，山西省政协党组书记、主席等职务上的便利，为他人谋取利益，非法收受他人财物，数额 特别巨大，依法应当以受贿罪追究其刑事责任。 9月24日，据最高检消息，山西省政协原党组书记、主席吴存荣涉嫌受贿一案，由国家监察委员会调查 终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。最高人民检察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对吴存荣作出逮捕决定，并指定由北 京市人民检察院第二分院审查起诉。近日，北京市人民检察院第二分院已向北京市第二中级人民法院提 起公诉。 ...

青海省政协原副主席马丰胜被公诉 中新社北京9月23日电 (记者 张素)中国官方23日通报青海省政协原党组成员、副主席马丰胜涉嫌受贿一 案进展。最高人民检察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对马丰胜作出逮捕决定，并指定由甘肃省兰州市人民检察院 审查起诉。 兰州市人民检察院近日已向兰州市中级人民法院提起公诉。检察机关起诉指控称，被告人马丰胜利用担 任青海省循化县委副书记、县长，青海省海东地区行署副专员，青海省扶贫开发局党组书记、局长，青 海省政协党组成员、副主席等职务上的便利，以及职权或者地位形成的便利条件，为他人谋取利益，非 法收受他人财物，数额特别巨大，依法应当以受贿罪追究其刑事责任。 公开资料显示，马丰胜，撒拉族，1963年4月出生，青海省循化县人，2021年2月起任青海省政协副主 席。2024年12月，官方通报其被查。 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 今年5月，中央纪委国家监委通报马丰胜严重违纪违法被开除党籍和公职。他 ...

中新社北京9月10日电 (记者 张素)记者从中国最高人民法院获悉，9月10日，山西省吕梁市中级人民法 院一审公开宣判北京市人民政府原党组成员、副市长高朋受贿、玩忽职守一案，对被告人高朋以受贿罪 判处有期徒刑十一年，并处罚金人民币三百万元，以玩忽职守罪判处有期徒刑三年，决定执行有期徒刑 十二年，并处罚金人民币三百万元；对高朋受贿犯罪所得财物及孳息依法予以追缴，上缴国库。 公开资料显示，高朋生于1972年7月，辽宁凤城人。2024年4月，官方通报其被查；同年10月，官方通报 其被开除党籍和公职。他被指"玩忽职守，给国家利益造成重大损失""在重大风险考验面前退缩不前、 逃避责任""骗取学历、学位""违规买卖股票""搞权钱交易"等。 经审理查明，2007年至2024年，被告人高朋利用担任北京市基础设施投资有限公司总经理助理兼融资建 设部经理、副总经理，北京地铁十号线投资有限公司董事长兼总经理，北京市丰台区副区长，北京市发 展和改革委员会副主任，北京市顺义区区委副书记、区长、区委书记等职务上的便利，以及利用本人职 权或者地位形成的便利条件，通过其他国家工作人员职务上的行为，为有关个人在入职晋升、企业经 营、工程承揽等事 ...

吕梁市中级人民法院认为，被告人高朋的行为构成受贿罪、玩忽职守罪，其受贿数额特别巨大，玩忽职守致使公共财产、国家和人民利益遭 受重大损失，情节特别严重，均应依法惩处，并予数罪并罚。鉴于其具有重大立功表现，受贿犯罪中有未遂情节，到案后如实供述罪行，主动交 代办案机关尚未掌握的大部分受贿事实，认罪悔罪，积极退赃，受贿所得赃款赃物已全部追缴，玩忽职守所造成的损失大部分已挽回，依法可对 其从轻处罚。法庭遂作出上述判决。 据悉，吕梁市中级人民法院于2025年6月5日公开开庭审理了该案。庭审中，检察机关出示了相关证据，被告人高朋及其辩护人进行了质证， 控辩双方在法庭的主持下充分发表了意见，高朋进行了最后陈述，并当庭表示认罪悔罪。人大代表、政协委员和各界群众20余人旁听了庭审。 现场图。（山西省吕梁市中级人民法院供图） 新华社太原9月10日电 9月10日，山西省吕梁市中级人民法院一审公开宣判北京市人民政府原党组成员、副市长高朋受贿、玩忽职守一案， 对被告人高朋以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十一年，并处罚金人民币三百万元，以玩忽职守罪判处有期徒刑三年，决定执行有期徒刑十二年，并处罚金 人民币三百万元；对高朋受贿犯罪所得财物及孳息依法予以 ...

检察机关在审查起诉阶段，依法告知了被告人章更生享有的诉讼权利，并讯问了被告人，听取了辩护人 的意见。检察机关起诉指控：被告人章更生利用担任中国建设银行股份有限公司集团客户部（营业部） 总经理，中国建设银行股份有限公司党委委员、副行长等职务上的便利，为有关单位和个人谋取利益， 非法收受他人财物，数额特别巨大；被告人章更生身为银行工作人员，违反国家规定发放贷款，数额特 别巨大且造成特别重大损失，依法应当以受贿罪、违法发放贷款罪追究其刑事责任。 检察机关依法对章更生涉嫌受贿、违法发放贷款案提起公诉 新华社北京9月8日电记者8日从最高人民检察院获悉，中国建设银行股份有限公司原党委委员、副行长 章更生涉嫌受贿、违法发放贷款一案，由国家监察委员会调查终结，经最高人民检察院指定，由山东省 淄博市人民检察院审查起诉。近日，淄博市人民检察院已向淄博市中级人民法院提起公诉。 来源：新华社 （文章来源：上海证券报） ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the investigation and prosecution of Liu Mancang, a former high-ranking official in Henan Province, for serious corruption charges including bribery and abuse of power [2][3][6]. Group 1: Investigation and Charges - Liu Mancang is accused of using his various official positions to gain illegal benefits for others and accepting substantial bribes, with the amounts being particularly large [3][6]. - The investigation was concluded by the National Supervisory Commission and the case was transferred to the Suzhou Municipal People's Procuratorate for prosecution [2][3]. Group 2: Background and Career - Liu Mancang held multiple significant positions, including Secretary of the Shangqiu Municipal Committee, Vice Governor of Henan Province, and Deputy Director of the Standing Committee of the Henan Provincial People's Congress [6][7]. - His career spanned several decades, with notable roles in local and provincial government, culminating in his position as Deputy Director of the Henan Provincial People's Congress until 2018 [7]. Group 3: Disciplinary Actions - Liu was expelled from the Communist Party and stripped of his benefits due to severe violations of party discipline and laws, including engaging in superstitious activities and accepting gifts and money [4][6]. - The decision to expel him was made by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and was based on his persistent misconduct after the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party [6].

Core Viewpoint - The case illustrates a hidden bribery scheme disguised as a rental agreement, where the essence of the transaction is a quid pro quo relationship between a government official and a construction company owner [1][3]. Group 1: Case Details - The case involves a government official (甲) and a construction company owner (乙), where甲 used his position to assist乙 in municipal projects, leading to a rental agreement for a shop that乙 never intended to use [2]. -甲 purchased a shop in 2019 and later proposed that乙 rent it, despite乙's acknowledgment of the shop's poor location and lack of demand [2]. - The rental agreement was structured to appear legitimate, with甲 receiving a total of 384,000 yuan over four years, despite乙's company never actually using the shop [2][5]. Group 2: Legal Perspectives - There are three differing opinions on the nature of甲's actions: one views it as a legitimate civil transaction, another suggests it should be evaluated against market rental prices, while the third argues it is a clear case of bribery disguised as a rental agreement [3][4]. - The third viewpoint is supported by evidence that both parties were aware of the lack of genuine rental intent, indicating that the rental payments were essentially bribes for甲's official assistance [4][5]. Group 3: Conclusion on Bribery - The actions of甲 meet the criteria for bribery, as he knowingly exploited his position to benefit乙, who had no real need for the rental, thus confirming the transaction as a means of transferring benefits [5][6]. - The total amount received by甲 should be considered as the full bribe amount, as the rental payments were not based on a legitimate rental relationship but rather a facade for the exchange of favors [6].

Core Viewpoint - The case against Song Quanan, former deputy general manager of China Financial Publishing Media Group, highlights issues of negligence and corruption within state-owned enterprises, resulting in significant financial losses and legal consequences for the involved parties [1][3][4]. Group 1: Negligence in State-Owned Enterprises - From 2017 to 2023, Song Quanan, as the legal representative and chairman of Zhongcai Quanxing Capital Management Co., Ltd., failed to conduct thorough due diligence and risk management, leading to a loss of approximately 23.64 million yuan due to a failed investment of 50 million yuan [3]. - The court found that Song Quanan's negligence in managing the investment and lack of oversight on fund usage contributed to the financial losses incurred by the company [3]. Group 2: Corruption and Bribery - Between October 2018 and November 2023, Song Quanan illegally accepted bribes totaling 550,000 yuan in exchange for facilitating job placements and promotions for individuals within the company [4]. - The court ruled that Song Quanan's actions constituted both negligence and bribery, warranting a combined penalty under the law [4].

庭审中，公诉机关出示了相关证据，被告人闫桂军及其辩护人进行了质证，控辩双方在法庭的主持 下充分发表了意见，闫桂军进行了最后陈述并当庭表示认罪悔罪。庭审最后，法庭宣布休庭，择期宣 判。 荆州市人民检察院指控：2002年下半年至2021年，被告人闫桂军利用担任光大银行宁波分行党委书 记、行长，光大银行公司业务部总经理，光大金控资产管理有限公司党委副书记、总裁，光大兴拢信托 有限责任公司党委副书记、党委书记、总裁、董事长等职务上的便利，为有关单位和个人在贷款审批、 业务发展和入职晋升等事项上提供帮助，非法收受财物，共计折合人民币21171万余元。2016年5月至 2020年2月，闫桂军在担任光大信托党委副书记、党委书记、总裁、董事长期间，明知相关公司不符合 贷款条件，违反法律规定，指使下属办理并违规审批，促使相关信托计划等项目通过评审，向相关公司 发放贷款共计63.9亿余元。2020年5月至7月，闫桂军在担任光大信托党委书记、董事长期间，违反国有 资产转让监管规定，擅自批准将某公司战略配售股票收益权以远期方式转让给不具备战略投资资格的相 关自然人。检察机关提请以受贿罪、违法发放贷款罪、国有公司人员滥用职权罪追究闫桂 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case against Tan Ruishong, former chairman of China Aviation Industry Corporation, involves serious allegations of embezzlement, bribery, insider trading, and leaking insider information, leading to a public prosecution by the Dalian People's Procuratorate [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Legal Proceedings - Tan Ruishong is accused of illegally occupying public property while holding various high-ranking positions within the China Aviation Industry Corporation, with the amount involved being particularly large [2]. - He allegedly used his positions to benefit others and accepted substantial bribes, also involving insider trading activities during sensitive periods [2]. - The Dalian People's Procuratorate has formally initiated prosecution against Tan Ruishong, following investigations by the National Supervisory Commission and local police [1][2]. Group 2: Background Information - Tan Ruishong was born in February 1962 in Jilin City, Jilin Province, and has a long history of working within the aviation sector, having held multiple senior roles in the China Aviation Industry Corporation [3]. - He served as the chairman and party secretary of China Aviation Industry Corporation from May 2018 until his resignation in March 2023 [4].