Quantitative Models and Construction Methods 1. Model Name: Counter-Cyclical Allocation Model - **Model Construction Idea**: Predict the macroeconomic environment using proxy variables and allocate assets that perform best under the predicted environment[26][31] - **Model Construction Process**: - Use proxy variables to forecast the macroeconomic environment (e.g., Inflation, Growth, etc.) - Allocate assets based on historical performance under the predicted environment - For Q3 2025, the model predicted an "Inflation" environment, leading to allocations in CSI 300, CSI 2000, Nanhua Commodity Index, and ChinaBond Total Wealth Index[26] - **Model Evaluation**: Provides a systematic approach to asset allocation based on macroeconomic conditions[26] 2. Model Name: Macro Momentum Model - **Model Construction Idea**: Constructed using multiple dimensions such as economic growth, inflation, interest rates, exchange rates, and risk sentiment to time asset classes like stocks and bonds[26] - **Model Construction Process**: - Incorporate macroeconomic indicators, positioning data, volume-price factors, and sentiment factors - Apply the model to time assets such as CSI 300, ChinaBond Total Wealth Index, and gold contracts (AU9999)[26] - **Model Evaluation**: Offers a multi-dimensional perspective for timing asset allocation[26] 3. Model Name: Multi-Factor Industry Rotation Model - **Model Construction Idea**: Combines historical fundamentals, expected fundamentals, sentiment, volume-price technicals, and macroeconomic factors to rotate among industries[27] - **Model Construction Process**: - Match ETFs with their corresponding CSI Level-1 industries - Use a pool of 23 industries to construct the benchmark - Allocate weights to ETFs based on the model's output[27][29] - **Model Evaluation**: Provides a structured approach to industry rotation, leveraging multiple factor dimensions[27] 4. Model Name: Absolute Return Strategies (Blended Models) - **Model Construction Idea**: Combine macro timing and industry rotation strategies with asset rebalancing to achieve absolute returns[31][37] - **Model Construction Process**: - Implement 20/80 stock-bond rebalancing and risk parity strategies - Enhance these strategies with macro timing and industry ETF rotation[31][37] - **Model Evaluation**: Enhances traditional rebalancing strategies with timing and rotation components for better returns[31][37] --- Model Backtesting Results 1. Counter-Cyclical Allocation Model - CSI 300 Q3 2025 Return: 14.38%[26] - CSI 2000 Q3 2025 Return: 16.58%[26] - Nanhua Commodity Index Q3 2025 Return: 4.17%[26] - ChinaBond Total Wealth Index Q3 2025 Return: -1.08%[26] 2. Macro Momentum Model - CSI 300 September 2025 Return: 0.11%[26] - ChinaBond Total Wealth Index September 2025 Return: -0.31%[26] - AU9999 Gold Contract September 2025 Return: 5.72%[26] 3. Multi-Factor Industry Rotation Model - Weekly Return: 0.61% (Excess Return: 0.79% over Wind All A Index)[27][28] - Monthly Return (September 2025): 0.82% (Excess Return: 0.28% over Wind All A Index)[27][28] 4. Absolute Return Strategies (Blended Models) - **Macro Timing + 20/80 Rebalancing**: - Weekly Return: -0.10% - Monthly Return: -0.09% - YTD Return: 3.85% - Annualized Volatility: 3.38% - Max Drawdown: 1.78% - Sharpe Ratio: 1.61[32] - **Macro Timing + Risk Parity**: - Weekly Return: -0.01% - Monthly Return: -0.15% - YTD Return: 1.58% - Annualized Volatility: 1.75% - Max Drawdown: 1.50% - Sharpe Ratio: 1.27[32] - **Macro Timing + Industry ETF Rotation + 20/80 Rebalancing**: - Weekly Return: 0.22% - Monthly Return: 0.21% - YTD Return: 7.83% - Annualized Volatility: 5.28% - Max Drawdown: 2.54% - Sharpe Ratio: 2.12[32] - **Macro Timing + Industry ETF Rotation + Risk Parity**: - Weekly Return: 0.11% - Monthly Return: -0.03% - YTD Return: 2.94% - Annualized Volatility: 2.18% - Max Drawdown: 1.45% - Sharpe Ratio: 1.90[32] --- Quantitative Factors and Construction Methods 1. Factor Name: PB Earnings - **Factor Construction Idea**: Focuses on price-to-book ratios and earnings growth to identify undervalued stocks with growth potential[39][41] - **Factor Construction Process**: - Calculate PB ratios for stocks - Combine with earnings growth metrics to rank stocks[39][41] - **Factor Evaluation**: Targets value-oriented opportunities with growth potential[39][41] 2. Factor Name: High Dividend Yield - **Factor Construction Idea**: Selects stocks with high dividend yields for stable income generation[39][41] - **Factor Construction Process**: - Rank stocks based on dividend yield - Adjust for payout sustainability metrics[39][41] - **Factor Evaluation**: Suitable for income-focused strategies[39][41] 3. Factor Name: Small-Cap Value - **Factor Construction Idea**: Targets small-cap stocks with low valuations for higher growth potential[39][41] - **Factor Construction Process**: - Identify small-cap stocks - Rank based on valuation metrics like P/E and P/B ratios[39][41] - **Factor Evaluation**: Captures the small-cap premium with a value tilt[39][41] 4. Factor Name: Small-Cap Growth - **Factor Construction Idea**: Focuses on small-cap stocks with high growth potential[39][41] - **Factor Construction Process**: - Identify small-cap stocks - Rank based on growth metrics like revenue and earnings growth rates[39][41] - **Factor Evaluation**: Targets high-growth opportunities in the small-cap space[39][41] --- Factor Backtesting Results 1. PB Earnings - **10/90 Rebalancing**: - Weekly Return: -0.18% - Monthly Return: -0.04% - YTD Return: 2.49% - Annualized Volatility: 2.34% - Max Drawdown: 1.82% - Sharpe Ratio: -0.01[41] - **20/80 Rebalancing**: - Weekly Return: -0.39% - Monthly Return: -0.11% - YTD Return: 4.06% - Annualized Volatility: 4.71% - Max Drawdown: 3.79% - Sharpe Ratio: 0.19[41] 2. High Dividend Yield - **10/90 Rebalancing**: - Weekly Return: -0.12% - Monthly Return: -0.09% - YTD Return: 1.91% - Annualized Volatility: 2.09% - Max Drawdown: 1.39% - Sharpe Ratio: -0.18[41] - **20/80 Rebalancing**: - Weekly Return: -0.28% - Monthly Return: -0.22% - YTD Return: 2.88% - Annualized Volatility: 4.19% - Max Drawdown: 3.47% - Sharpe Ratio: 0.05[41] 3. Small-Cap Value - **10/90 Rebalancing**: - Weekly Return: -0.27% - Monthly Return: -0.07% - YTD Return: 5.35% - Annualized Volatility: 3.55% - Max Drawdown: 3.69% - Sharpe Ratio: 0.47[41] - **20/80 Rebalancing**: - Weekly Return: -0.57% - Monthly Return: -0.16% - YTD Return: 9.91% - Annualized Volatility: 7.14% - Max Drawdown: 7.74% - Sharpe Ratio: 0.60[41]

Group 1 - The median return of conservative fixed income + products was 0.09% for the week of June 16-20, 2025, with 294 products reaching historical net value highs [2][20] - The total market size of fixed income + funds reached 1,692.127 billion, with 1,173 products available as of June 20, 2025 [2][10] - The performance of various fund types showed divergence, with median returns for mixed bond type funds being 0.10% for level one and -0.02% for level two [2][12] Group 2 - The macro environment forecast for Q2 2025 indicates inflation, with the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index, the China government bond index, and gold showing respective increases of 0.17%, 0.71%, and 1.28% since June [2][3] - The recommended industry ETFs for June 2025 include those focused on securities companies, semiconductors, banks, and major consumer sectors, achieving a combined return of 0.21% for the week [2][3] Group 3 - The stock-bond mixed strategy showed a return of 0.03% for the 20/80 rebalancing strategy, while the risk parity strategy yielded a return of 0.15% [3][3] - The small-cap value style within the stock-bond 20/80 combination performed best with a year-to-date return of 5.17% [3][3] - The cumulative return for the small-cap value combination, adjusted for macro momentum, was 2.55% [3][3]

Group 1 - The global financial market is experiencing turbulence due to the imposition of tariffs by the United States, but several prominent private equity firms remain optimistic about the Chinese market [1] - The valuation of blue-chip stocks in the A-share market is considered very cheap, with the overall shareholder return ratio expected to be higher after buybacks [1] - The recent market correction is attributed to an overreaction to emotions, and the pricing model has shifted to account for future uncertainties following the announcement of U.S. tariff policies [1][2] Group 2 - Many Chinese companies have significantly enhanced their ability to withstand external shocks since the trade war began in 2018, presenting investment opportunities for those wrongly punished by market emotions [2] - The capital market is expected to undergo a rapid clearing process to price in risks, with confidence in China's ability to effectively respond to tariff impacts and maintain economic growth [2] - The A-share market's reaction to current tariff policies is believed to have stabilized, with valuations returning to reasonable levels after a rapid adjustment [2] Group 3 - The global economy is undergoing profound changes, and the U.S. tariff policy may reshape industry distribution for years to come, with China being a significant player as both a global factory and a large consumer market [3] - Companies are encouraged to focus on their competitive advantages and provide value that consumers are willing to pay for, as China remains a "high certainty" investment destination for both domestic and foreign capital [3]