Core Viewpoint - Trump is determined to ignite a new round of global trade wars, specifically targeting countries aligned with BRICS, threatening an additional 10% tariff on them [1][3]. Group 1: Trade War Dynamics - Trump has expressed concerns that BRICS nations are undermining the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency, equating its loss to "losing a world war" [3]. - The U.S. has issued unilateral tariffs ranging from 25% to 40% on 14 countries, with Southeast Asia being heavily impacted, including allies like Japan and South Korea [3]. - The BRICS summit revealed that BRICS GDP, calculated by purchasing power parity, reached $77 trillion, surpassing G7's $57 trillion, indicating a significant shift in global economic power [3][5]. Group 2: Responses from BRICS Nations - Vietnam has capitulated to U.S. pressure, agreeing to lower tariffs to avoid losing access to the American market, which constitutes a significant portion of its GDP [5]. - In contrast, Brazilian President Lula publicly rejected U.S. dominance, stating, "We do not want an emperor," highlighting the resistance among BRICS nations [5]. - A joint statement from BRICS countries criticized unilateral tariffs as violations of WTO rules, signaling a united front against U.S. actions [5][6]. Group 3: Economic Implications - The rise of BRICS is not merely numerical but represents a restructuring of global economic systems, controlling over 44% of global oil production and over 90% of rare earth supply chains [5]. - Lula emphasized the need for alternative currencies beyond the dollar in global trade, suggesting a shift towards a multipolar world order that could isolate the U.S. [6].

Group 1 - The core message of Trump's statement is a display of anxiety regarding the decline of U.S. global hegemony, as he threatens a 10% tariff on countries supporting BRICS policies [1][3] - The rise of BRICS nations is a significant factor contributing to U.S. anxiety, as their achievements are reshaping global governance towards a more equitable direction, challenging U.S. unilateralism [3][5] - Trump's threats are ineffective as they reflect a misunderstanding of global dynamics; the attempt to coerce other nations into severing ties with BRICS is unrealistic and counterproductive [5] Group 2 - The ambiguous definition of "anti-American policies" in Trump's statement primarily targets the challenge to U.S. hegemony posed by the rise of BRICS and countries like China and Russia [3][5] - The actions taken by BRICS nations, such as promoting local currency settlements, represent a trend that the U.S. cannot easily impede, indicating a shift towards a multipolar world [5]