Group 1 - The article discusses the allure and complexities of upward social networking, highlighting its appeal as a means to access elite circles and resources [2][4][34] - It emphasizes the structured hierarchy within social events, categorizing individuals into distinct roles such as "whales" (super-rich), "girls" (models), "brokers" (intermediaries), and "lettuce" (upper-middle-class) [5][6][12] - The dynamics of power and beauty are explored, indicating that while beauty grants access, it does not equate to equal power within these social settings [20][21][22] Group 2 - The article notes that individuals engage in upward social networking not just for tangible benefits but also for the thrill of proximity to wealth and status [13][16][34] - It highlights the self-deception among brokers who believe they can leverage their connections for future opportunities, despite the inherent power imbalances [24][27][32] - The text concludes that upward social networking is deeply rooted in structural inequalities, making it a challenging and often unfulfilling pursuit [34][36][38]

Core Viewpoint - The discussion revolves around Zhang Xuefeng's potential departure from live streaming, highlighting the impact of information disparity on educational choices and career paths for students from different socioeconomic backgrounds [1][3][7]. Group 1: Zhang Xuefeng's Role and Impact - Zhang Xuefeng is perceived as a crucial figure in bridging the information gap for ordinary families, providing practical advice on educational and career choices [6][7]. - His guidance has led to significant shifts in student enrollment in certain majors, particularly a decline in journalism and advertising programs [6][7]. - The advice he offers is rooted in a pragmatic approach, emphasizing employability and practical outcomes for students from less privileged backgrounds [7]. Group 2: Information Disparity and Its Consequences - The article discusses how information disparity serves as a barrier to social mobility, affecting students' ability to make informed decisions about their futures [3][7]. - It highlights the cyclical nature of socioeconomic status, where families often replicate the career paths of previous generations due to a lack of access to diverse information [8]. - The narrative suggests that Zhang Xuefeng's insights challenge traditional norms and aim to disrupt the cycle of limited opportunities for lower-income families [8].