Core Points - The Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering announced the results of the 2025 academician election, with 73 and 71 academicians elected respectively, further optimizing the structure of the academician team [1] - The election process reflects the real ecology of China's academic community and responds directly to the demand for talent in the current era, serving as a barometer for the future direction of China's scientific and technological strategy [1] Group 1: Election Discipline - The 2025 election has introduced the strictest disciplinary measures to date, including a "silent period" where candidates cannot contact review experts or engage in media promotion to minimize non-academic influences [2][3] - The Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering have implemented additional measures to ensure the fairness and integrity of the election process, including prohibiting candidates from engaging in lobbying or informal communications during the election period [2][3] Group 2: Evaluation Reform - The 2023 election marks the first after the deepening of the academician system reform, introducing a mechanism where each academician can recommend one candidate and incorporating external peer evaluations, moving away from a purely internal review process [4] - The evaluation process now emphasizes contributions to scientific problems and industry development, making it more objective and professional [4][6] Group 3: Contribution Orientation - The selection process has shifted to a "contribution-oriented" approach, breaking away from traditional metrics and focusing on the actual impact of candidates' work [5][6] - The age structure of newly elected academicians has been optimized, with a notable trend towards younger candidates, reflecting a commitment to nurturing the next generation of scientific leaders [6] Group 4: National Strategic Needs - The election guidelines emphasize selecting candidates who have made contributions to key areas aligned with national strategic needs, including emerging disciplines and major engineering projects [7][8] - The inclusion of private enterprise scientists in the election marks a significant breakthrough, with specific quotas established to support candidates from leading private technology companies [8]

Group 1: Key Core Technology System - The meeting emphasized the need to establish a new national system for tackling key core technologies, integrating government, market, and society to optimize mechanisms and enhance collaborative efforts [3][4] - It highlighted the importance of strategic planning and systematic layout, focusing on key areas related to national industry, economy, and security, and identifying core technology breakthroughs [3][4] Group 2: Academy System Reform - The meeting discussed the need to improve the selection quality of academicians, ensuring that the title is more honorific and academic, while preventing misconduct during the selection process [2][4] - It called for academicians to focus on scientific research and to enhance their role in addressing major national scientific challenges and mentoring young researchers [4] Group 3: Resource Conservation - Resource conservation was identified as a fundamental national policy, with significant efforts made since the 18th National Congress to reduce resource intensity and promote a circular economy [5][6] - The meeting stressed the importance of enhancing public awareness of resource conservation and implementing a pricing mechanism that reflects resource scarcity and environmental costs [5] Group 4: Rural Collective Land Reform - The meeting addressed the reform of rural collective operating construction land, emphasizing the need for careful and prudent advancement, ensuring equal rights and responsibilities in land use [6][7] - It highlighted the importance of maintaining the nature of public land ownership and protecting farmers' interests while allowing rural land to enter the market under the same rules as state-owned land [6][7] Group 5: Rural Healthcare System - The meeting recognized the progress made in improving the rural healthcare system, focusing on enhancing infrastructure, workforce, and service capabilities to ensure equitable access to healthcare for farmers [7] - It called for better coordination of medical resources in rural areas and emphasized the need for talent cultivation and improved compensation for rural healthcare workers [7]

Core Points - The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Division has played a crucial role in China's scientific and technological development since its establishment in 1955, serving as the highest advisory body for science and technology in the country [1][2][3] Group 1: Major Contributions - The CAS Division initiated significant projects such as the "863 Program" and the establishment of the National Natural Science Foundation, which have greatly advanced high-tech research in China [3][4] - The Division has completed over 380 consultation reports and submitted more than 400 suggestions to the central government, demonstrating its active involvement in national macro decision-making [5] - The CAS Division has organized numerous public science education activities, including the "Science and China" campaign, which has conducted over 10,000 events since its inception in 2002 [6][7] Group 2: Scientific Ethics and Institutional Reform - Since the 1980s, the CAS Division has advocated for scientific ethics and academic integrity, establishing various guidelines and committees to promote these values [7][8] - The Division has undergone reforms to enhance the quality of the academician selection process, ensuring that the title of academician remains prestigious and focused on academic merit [8][9] - Recent reforms emphasize the importance of maintaining the academic nature and honor of the academician title, optimizing the demographic and disciplinary structure of the academicians [8][9]