中国科学院、中国工程院（以下简称"两院"）11月21日公布2025年院士增选结果，分别选举产生中国科 学院院士73人，中国工程院院士71人。本次增选后，我国院士队伍结构进一步优化。 院士是我国科学技术方面和工程科技领域的最高荣誉称号，院士制度是党和国家为树立尊重知识、尊重 人才导向，凝聚优秀人才服务国家设立的一项重要制度。 每两年进行一次的院士增选备受关注。它是一面镜子，映照出中国学术界的真实生态，是对时代人才需 求的最直观回应；它更是风向标，昭示着中国科技战略的未来航向。 严明纪律：以制度刚性筑牢风清气正"防火墙" 今年8月，在公布2025年院士增选有效候选人名单时，中国科学院发布的一则通知引起广泛关注。 "不以任何形式，由本人或通过所在单位及相关人员实施说情打招呼""严格遵守'静默期'要求"……《关 于进一步强调2025年中国科学院院士增选工作纪律的通知》公布的六项纪律规定，堪称历年最严。其 中，"静默期"要求候选人不得主动接触评审专家、不得在各类媒体以提升知名度为目的进行虚假宣传， 力求最大程度减少非学术因素对评审的干扰。 中国工程院则发布了《关于进一步强化院士增选纪律的通知》，强调院士不得参加候选人及 ...

Group 1: Key Core Technology System - The meeting emphasized the need to establish a new national system for tackling key core technologies, integrating government, market, and society to optimize mechanisms and enhance collaborative efforts [3][4] - It highlighted the importance of strategic planning and systematic layout, focusing on key areas related to national industry, economy, and security, and identifying core technology breakthroughs [3][4] Group 2: Academy System Reform - The meeting discussed the need to improve the selection quality of academicians, ensuring that the title is more honorific and academic, while preventing misconduct during the selection process [2][4] - It called for academicians to focus on scientific research and to enhance their role in addressing major national scientific challenges and mentoring young researchers [4] Group 3: Resource Conservation - Resource conservation was identified as a fundamental national policy, with significant efforts made since the 18th National Congress to reduce resource intensity and promote a circular economy [5][6] - The meeting stressed the importance of enhancing public awareness of resource conservation and implementing a pricing mechanism that reflects resource scarcity and environmental costs [5] Group 4: Rural Collective Land Reform - The meeting addressed the reform of rural collective operating construction land, emphasizing the need for careful and prudent advancement, ensuring equal rights and responsibilities in land use [6][7] - It highlighted the importance of maintaining the nature of public land ownership and protecting farmers' interests while allowing rural land to enter the market under the same rules as state-owned land [6][7] Group 5: Rural Healthcare System - The meeting recognized the progress made in improving the rural healthcare system, focusing on enhancing infrastructure, workforce, and service capabilities to ensure equitable access to healthcare for farmers [7] - It called for better coordination of medical resources in rural areas and emphasized the need for talent cultivation and improved compensation for rural healthcare workers [7]

Core Points - The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Division has played a crucial role in China's scientific and technological development since its establishment in 1955, serving as the highest advisory body for science and technology in the country [1][2][3] Group 1: Major Contributions - The CAS Division initiated significant projects such as the "863 Program" and the establishment of the National Natural Science Foundation, which have greatly advanced high-tech research in China [3][4] - The Division has completed over 380 consultation reports and submitted more than 400 suggestions to the central government, demonstrating its active involvement in national macro decision-making [5] - The CAS Division has organized numerous public science education activities, including the "Science and China" campaign, which has conducted over 10,000 events since its inception in 2002 [6][7] Group 2: Scientific Ethics and Institutional Reform - Since the 1980s, the CAS Division has advocated for scientific ethics and academic integrity, establishing various guidelines and committees to promote these values [7][8] - The Division has undergone reforms to enhance the quality of the academician selection process, ensuring that the title of academician remains prestigious and focused on academic merit [8][9] - Recent reforms emphasize the importance of maintaining the academic nature and honor of the academician title, optimizing the demographic and disciplinary structure of the academicians [8][9]