Group 1 - The article discusses the importance of intuitive and embodied intelligence, emphasizing that true understanding comes from experience rather than abstract reasoning [1][39][84] - It highlights the concept of "world models" in AI, which aim to enable machines to understand and interact with the physical world in a more human-like manner [23][76][84] - The text draws parallels between human cognitive processes and AI development, suggesting that both rely on a form of non-verbal, intuitive understanding [17][29][72] Group 2 - The article references the limitations of current AI systems in understanding the physical world compared to human capabilities, particularly in spatial reasoning and perception [18][22][25] - It discusses the evolution of intelligence, noting that human cognitive abilities have been shaped by millions of years of evolution, which AI is still trying to replicate [21][75] - The piece concludes with the notion that as AI develops its own "taste" through embodied experiences, it may reach a level of understanding that parallels human intuition [72][84][85]