Really sharp how they're doing thisUsers deposit SOLPhantom takes it and converts to USDC on Hyperliquid in backendSliding bar UI to make tradesGreat user experience, abstracts away all the pain points of bridging to and using Hype and all on mobile https://t.co/C74Pnic3Od ...

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that the prevalent use of chat interfaces in AI products is a result of laziness in design, leading to a failure in user experience and interaction efficiency [4][5][8]. Group 1: Chat Interface as a Design Flaw - Chat interfaces are described as a lazy product of design, which fails to adapt to user needs and instead forces users to learn the system [5][12]. - The uniformity of AI product interfaces is alarming, indicating a lack of user-centered design [7][8]. - Nearly 50% of potential users are deterred by chat-based AI tools due to usability issues, which require users to act as "prompt engineers" [12][28]. Group 2: Inefficiency in User Interaction - Users spend 11% to 27% of their time in inefficient interactions with AI, with 26% of their questions remaining unresolved [11][12]. - The complexity of AI collaboration is compared to cooking with a sous-chef, requiring iterative work rather than simple queries like Google Search [13][14]. - Heavy users of AI tools experience cognitive overload due to the need to explain context repeatedly and transfer outputs manually [13][14]. Group 3: Successful AI Product Design Examples - Companies like GitHub and Microsoft have successfully integrated AI into existing workflows, enhancing productivity by 56% through seamless integration rather than isolated chat windows [16][17]. - The design of these products emphasizes the role of AI in empowering existing workflows rather than replacing them with inferior interaction modes [16][17]. Group 4: Proposed Design Framework - A new design framework called "Hybrid Workspace" is proposed, which includes a work environment and an intelligent layer that integrates AI capabilities contextually [17][18]. - This framework aims to reduce the cognitive load on users by eliminating the barrier between thinking and acting, thus maintaining user flow [22][27]. Group 5: Future of AI UX Design - By 2025, companies that continue to prioritize chat-first models will struggle against those that create workflow-native AI experiences [28][29]. - The industry faces a choice between refining chat interfaces or leading the way in creating valuable AI experiences that respect user intelligence and workflow [29][30].

indie Semiconductor (INDI) Q4 2024 Earnings Call February 20, 2025 05:00 PM ET Company Participants Ashish Gupta - Investor RelationsDonald McClymont - CEORaja Bal - Acting Chief Financial OfficerCraig Ellis - Director of ResearchGrant Joslin - DirectorWill Gildea - Equity Research Associate Conference Call Participants Suji Desilva - Managing Director, Senior Research AnalystCody Acree - Equity Research AnalystAnthony Stoss - Analyst Operator Good afternoon and welcome to IndiSummiconductors Fourth Quarter ...

京东在服饰长期投入，试图摆脱无尽追逐低价的循环。 直播电商里主播竭力吆喝着几块钱一件的 T 恤，既是中国作为世界工厂的电商物流基础设施的效率奇迹， 也是中国服装行业的悲歌。 服装行业正陷入这样的循环：电商平台对低价的极致追求让所有品牌都不得不比拼价格；商家忙忙碌碌被 卷入各种大促，利润却不见猛增；设计师新品牌减少，价格战不断挤压着这个行业需要的创意、灵感；服 装产能过剩，企业低价清仓，不少商家已面临生存挑战。 京东试图跳出这样的恶性循环。擅长卖手机电脑的京东不仅要卖衣服，还想 "多快好省" 地卖衣服 —— 既 有超过 20 万个的服饰商家，又有极具性价比的产业带服饰；既让消费者买到满意的衣服，又让服饰商家 在今天依然能在做生意的同时坚持品牌调性。 刘强东在 21 年前创立京东，坚持 "成本、效率、体验" 的方法论，这也成为了京东思考如何卖衣服的战略 脉络。 我们了解到，京东内部判断，"成本" 和 "效率" 都不是服装这个品类的关键要素，10 块钱和 10000 块钱的 衣服有不同的调性和各自的受众，人们也愿意为了好看的衣服牺牲效率，忍受数天的预售期。因此 "体验" 成为了京东在服饰上全力投入的制胜点。 消费者 ...