Information technology represented 34.4% of the S&P 500 at year-end 2025, creating concentration risk for investors with core equity portfolios heavily weighted toward mega-cap technology names, according to insights from SS&C ALPS Advisors. An equal sector investment approach offers a way to reduce this concentration while maintaining access to quality large-cap companies. EQL rebalances quarterly to maintain equal sector weights and carries a 0.27% expense ratio after contractual fee waivers through March ...

Key Points The S&P 500 index is the de facto stock market gauge used by Wall Street. If you want to invest in the index, it's best to opt for the most cost-effective option. However, a second option may offer a safety valve today, albeit at a higher cost. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard S&P 500 ETF › The percentage change in the S&P 500 index is what you'll likely be told if you ask someone how the market is doing. Currently, the big-picture answer is that the market is performing well, c ...

科创板100ETF（588120）跟踪的是科创100指数（000698），单日涨跌幅限制达20%，该指数从科创板 中选取市值较大、流动性较好的100只证券作为指数样本，覆盖了新一代信息技术、生物医药、新材料 等多个高新技术领域，以反映中国科技创新企业的整体表现和发展趋势。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 1月6日，科创板100ETF（588120）涨超1.2%，资金面看，连续3日资金净流入，科技巨头资本开支稳健 性受关注。 中泰证券指出，当前AI行情与2000年互联网泡沫存在本质差异：科技巨头盈利扎实、资本开支与现金 流匹配、债务杠杆可控；算力需求真实且面临能源硬约束，资本开支更具"防御性"战略色彩。算力需求 的真实性与"短缺经济"特征明显，用于训练最新LLMs的计算量以每年4~7倍的速度增长，而硬件效率提 升速度远不及此。能源瓶颈也构成硬约束，预计前沿LLMs训练的电力需求可能以每年2.2倍至2.9倍的速 度增长。 ...

Group 1 - AI infrastructure stocks have performed strongly, with the First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure ETF (GRID) returning 32% since early January 2025, outperforming the iShares All-Country World Index ETF [1] - The performance of AI infrastructure stocks indicates a growing interest and investment in this sector, reflecting broader market trends [1] Group 2 - The article emphasizes the importance of thematic investing and the role of macro drivers in asset classes such as stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, and crypto [1] - The narrative highlights the need for evidence-based storytelling using empirical data to engage investors effectively [1]

Core Insights - The article compares two ETFs, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL), highlighting their differing strategies in targeting reliable income through dividends [1][2]. Cost and Size Comparison - VIG has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.05% compared to NOBL's 0.35% [3][4]. - VIG has assets under management (AUM) of $120.4 billion, while NOBL has $11.3 billion [3][4]. Performance Metrics - As of December 12, 2025, VIG's one-year return is 12.73%, outperforming NOBL's 3.05% [3]. - VIG has a max drawdown of -20.39% over five years, while NOBL's is -17.92% [5]. Portfolio Composition - VIG tracks 338 U.S. large-cap stocks with a focus on technology (28%), financial services (22%), and healthcare (15%), with major holdings including Broadcom, Microsoft, and Apple [6]. - NOBL consists of 70 stocks, with a sector allocation skewed towards industrials (23%) and consumer defensive (22%), featuring top positions like Albemarle and Expeditors International [7]. Investment Strategy - VIG emphasizes dividend growth and broad diversification, making it suitable for long-term investors focused on cost efficiency [8][11]. - NOBL aims for stability and risk control through equal weighting and sector caps, appealing to investors who prioritize consistent dividends and downside awareness [10][11].

兄弟们，史诗级"开门红"有木有！ 沪指豪取日线十二连阳，不仅强势收复4000点整数关口，更一举创下自1993年以来、长达33年的最长连 阳纪录。 两市成交额暴增至2.55万亿元，超4100只个股上涨，市场情绪与资金热度双双飙至沸点，跨年行情这就 来了？ 高盛再发研报，预计2026年和2027年中国股市将每年上涨15%-20%，建议高配中国股票。 港股ETF全面爆发 港股ETF也是一片大涨。其中，创新药、互联网及芯片等板块表现尤为突出，成为市场上涨的核心动 力。 港股ETF三剑客--港股通创新药ETF（520880）、港股互联网ETF（513770）、港股信息技术ETF （159131）悉数大涨，分别涨5.4%、4.4%、3.6%。 | 序号 | 代理 | ETF名称 | 跟踪指数 | 2026.1.5 | 上市日期 | 最新规模 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | 涨幅 | | ((Z) | | 1 | 520880 | 港股通创新药ETF | 恒生灌胶通创新药 | 5.4% | 2025-07-07 | 21.0 | | | | | ...

上天天基金APP搜索777注册即可领500元券包，优选基金10元起投！限量发放！先到先得！ 1月5日早盘，市场高开高走。时隔34个交易日，上证指数盘中重回4000点。截至收盘，沪指涨 1.07%，深成指涨1.87%，创业板指涨2.15%。 板块来看，脑机接口概念爆发，商业航天概念反复活跃，保险板块走强；下跌方面，海南自贸概念集 体大跌，海南发展跌停。 全市场超4000只个股上涨，其中98只个股涨停。沪深两市半日成交额1.64万亿元，较上个交易日放 量3238亿。 想过会有新年开门红，但没想到能这么红！ 今天（1月5日），A股跳空高开，成交放量。 沪指 于10:19:45触及4004.04点， 时隔34个交易日重回 4000点关口。截至上午收盘，报4011.45点。 如此强势表现，也让沪指12连阳的新纪录几乎"板上钉钉 " 。 尽管本文完稿于午间，沪指能否收盘站上4000点尚有一些不确定性。 但即便午后有回落， 市场向好的趋 势——或者说"慢牛"，始终没有动摇。 数据显示，同类规模最大的A500ETF华泰柏瑞，早盘创出历史新高，成交额超110亿元。 | 名称 | 涨跌幅 | 成交额( | 年初至今 | | -- ...

Core Viewpoint - The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) offers broader diversification, higher recent returns, and a lower expense ratio compared to the ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL), which has a more concentrated sector mix and focuses on companies with long dividend growth histories [1][2]. Cost & Size Comparison - VYM has an expense ratio of 0.06%, significantly lower than NOBL's 0.35% - The one-year return for VYM is 12.2%, while NOBL's is 4.3% - VYM has a dividend yield of 2.4%, compared to NOBL's 2.1% - VYM's assets under management (AUM) stand at $84.5 billion, while NOBL's AUM is $11.2 billion [3][4]. Performance & Risk Comparison - Over five years, NOBL experienced a maximum drawdown of 17.92%, while VYM had a lower maximum drawdown of 15.83% - An investment of $1,000 would grow to $1,601 in VYM compared to $1,327 in NOBL over the same period [5]. Portfolio Composition - VYM holds 589 stocks with major sector exposures in financial services (21%), technology (18%), and healthcare (13%) - Top positions in VYM include Broadcom Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Exxon Mobil Corp. [6]. - NOBL consists of 70 stocks, primarily concentrated in consumer defensive (23%), industrials (21%), and financial services (13%) - Key holdings in NOBL include Albemarle Corp., Cardinal Health Inc., and C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. [7][8]. Investment Implications - VYM's diverse portfolio allows it to better withstand downturns in specific sectors, benefiting from its inclusion of technology stocks - NOBL's focus on companies with a history of increasing dividends results in a smaller, more concentrated portfolio, which may limit diversification [9][10].

Core Insights - The Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) are both low-cost, ultra-diversified U.S. equity ETFs with nearly identical performance metrics and sector allocations, but ITOT has a larger asset base and higher trading volume [2][4][8] Cost and Size - Both SCHB and ITOT have an expense ratio of 0.03% and a dividend yield of 1.1%, making them comparable in terms of fees and payouts [5] - As of late 2025, SCHB has $38.3 billion in assets under management (AUM), while ITOT has $80.4 billion, indicating ITOT's larger market presence [4][8] Performance and Risk Comparison - Over a five-year period, both ETFs experienced a maximum drawdown of -25.36%, demonstrating similar risk profiles [6] - A $1,000 investment in SCHB would have grown to $1,758, while the same investment in ITOT would have grown to $1,752, reflecting nearly identical performance [6] Portfolio Composition - ITOT holds 2,498 stocks, with sector allocations of 33% in technology, 13% in financial services, and 10% in consumer cyclical, featuring top positions in Nvidia (6.91%), Apple (6.03%), and Microsoft (5.41%) [7] - SCHB has 2,408 holdings with similar sector allocations: 34% in technology, 13% in financial services, and 10% in consumer cyclical, with comparable top positions in Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft [8]

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) highlights their differing approaches to dividend investing, with HDV focusing on defensive sectors and higher yields, while VYM offers broader diversification and lower costs [5][6]. Group 1: Fund Characteristics - HDV consists of 74 stocks with a sector focus on consumer defensive (28%), energy (24%), and healthcare (17%), featuring major positions in Exxon Mobil Corp., Johnson & Johnson, and Chevron Corp. [1] - VYM tracks a high-dividend index with 589 holdings, emphasizing financial services (21%), technology (18%), and healthcare (13%), with significant investments in Broadcom, JPMorgan Chase, and Exxon Mobil Corp. [2] - HDV has a higher dividend yield compared to VYM, but its higher expense ratio may reduce net income for investors [3][7]. Group 2: Performance and Risk - HDV is characterized by lower volatility and a lower maximum drawdown, making it suitable for risk-averse investors [7]. - VYM's larger number of holdings provides greater diversification, which can mitigate risks associated with downturns in specific sectors [8]. - VYM has a larger asset under management (AUM) of $84.5 billion, enhancing its liquidity compared to HDV [8]. Group 3: Investor Preferences - VYM is recommended for investors prioritizing diversification, lower costs, and stronger total returns over high dividend yields [9]. - HDV is more appealing to those who prioritize receiving the highest dividend yield with reduced volatility [9].