Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted investors between November 10, 2023, and February 27, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's technological capabilities were limited [2] - It is alleged that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2] - The complaint states that it would take several years for DoubleVerify's Activation Services related to certain closed platforms to become profitable [2] - Competitors of DoubleVerify were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, which negatively affected DoubleVerify's competitive stance and profitability [2] - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating from known data center server farms [2] - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2] - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the defendants regarding the company's business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [2] Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses in DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. during the specified timeframe have until July 21, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3] - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and class members may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket costs [3] Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [4]

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for alleged misrepresentations that led to significant stock price drops during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1]. Allegations Summary - Ad Spend Shift: Customers shifted advertising spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where DoubleVerify's technology was less effective and faced increased competition [7]. - Technology Development Costs: The costs and time required for developing technology for closed platforms were higher than disclosed by the company [7]. - Monetization Timeline: The timeline for monetizing Activation Services on closed platforms was projected to take several years [7]. - AI Competitiveness: Competitors were better positioned to integrate AI, which negatively impacted DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [7]. - Overbilling: The company allegedly overbilled customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating from data center server farms [7]. - Misleading Risk Disclosures: The company misrepresented existing problems as hypothetical risks in its disclosures [7]. - Misleading Positive Statements: False or misleading statements were made regarding the company's operations and future prospects [7]. Stock Performance - February 28, 2024: The stock fell over 21% after announcing lower Q1 2024 revenue growth expectations [7]. - May 7, 2024: The stock plunged nearly 39% after cutting the full-year 2024 revenue outlook [7]. - February 27, 2025: The stock dropped 36% following disappointing Q4 2024 results [7].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and financial performance during the class period from November 10, 2023, to February 27, 2025 [1] Group 1: Allegations Against the Company - The lawsuit claims that the company's customers were shifting ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where DoubleVerify's technological capabilities were limited [2] - It is alleged that the company's ability to monetize its high-margin Activation Services was constrained due to the high costs and time required for technology development for closed platforms [2] - The complaint states that monetization of Activation Services on certain closed platforms would take several years, contrary to what was disclosed to investors [2] - Competitors were reportedly better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive stance and profitability [2] - The company is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating from known data center server farms [2] - The risk disclosures provided by the company were claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [2] - As a result of these issues, the positive statements made by the company regarding its business and prospects were deemed materially false or misleading [2] Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who acquired shares of DoubleVerify are encouraged to contact the law firm before the lead plaintiff motion deadline of July 15, 2025 [3]

Core Viewpoint - DeepMind Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as "DeepMind") has submitted its prospectus for an IPO on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, despite experiencing a significant decline in performance amid the booming AI sector in 2024 [2][7]. Company Overview - Established in 2009, DeepMind is a decision-making AI technology company focusing on marketing and sales applications, with flagship platforms AlphaDesk and AlphaData [3]. - DeepMind serves a total of 68 clients across various industries, including e-commerce, fast-moving consumer goods, automotive, retail, beauty, and travel [3]. Financial Performance - DeepMind's revenue for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024 was 543 million, 611 million, and 538 million CNY, respectively, with net profits of 59.36 million, 60.66 million, and 21.52 million CNY [4]. - The company's gross profit margins were 30.9%, 31.2%, and 27.3% during the same period [4]. - The majority of revenue (over 80%) comes from the intelligent advertising business, with revenue contributions of 446 million, 492 million, and 460 million CNY for the respective years [4]. Client Dependency and Market Position - DeepMind's client concentration is high, with the top five clients contributing 51.1%, 50.2%, and 54.6% of total revenue in the respective years [8]. - The largest client shifted from Alibaba to WPP Group, with revenue from Alibaba dropping significantly, impacting overall profitability [8][9]. IPO and Fund Utilization - The IPO aims to raise funds for product development, expanding the sales network and customer base, strategic acquisitions, and general corporate purposes [10]. - DeepMind previously attempted to list on the A-share market but withdrew its application in June 2024, opting for a Hong Kong listing instead [5].

Core Viewpoint - Kuehn Law is investigating potential breaches of fiduciary duties by officers and directors of Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. related to misrepresentation of the company's competitive pricing pressures and revenue growth [1][2]. Group 1: Company Misrepresentation - Integral Ad Science (IAS) allegedly misrepresented its financial health by failing to disclose increased competitive pricing pressures, leading to price cuts due to weakening demand and slowing revenue growth [2]. - The company's pricing function was reported to be no longer 'favorable', indicating an inability to sustain pricing or implement price increases [2]. - Pricing has become a critical differentiator for IAS in securing major renewals and new deals, highlighting the competitive landscape [2]. - The risk of increased pricing pressure from competition has materialized, contradicting IAS's public statements which were deemed materially false and misleading [2].

Core Insights - Needham analyst Bernie McTernan reiterated a Hold rating on AppLovin Corp. (APP) and highlighted Axon 2 as a key growth tool for the company, which is an ad optimizer within the DSP [1] - The total number of websites using Axon increased by 3% to 323, with 18 new additions and 7 churns, indicating modest growth [1][2] - Apparel, Footwear & Accessories emerged as the largest category gainer, with 10 new additions and one churn [2] Company Performance - AppLovin reported having 600 e-commerce brands and a $1 billion ad spend run rate as of December [3] - The user count for the Axon pixel remained unchanged at 2,000, with a notable increase from 1,000 to 2,000 between February 28 and March 5 [6] - Projected second-quarter revenue is $1.21 billion with an EPS of $1.86 [6] Market Dynamics - The churn rate increased, with seven websites churning compared to one the previous month, although two of these companies shut down their businesses [2] - Reebok was noted as a significant brand addition to the Pixel, with sales around $5 billion, which is relatively low among the sampled big brands [4] - The valuation of AppLovin has become one of the highest in its coverage group, driven by expectations for monetizing its advertising platform [7]

Core Viewpoint - The DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 due to misleading statements and failure to disclose critical information regarding its business operations and financial performance [1][3]. Group 1: Allegations of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit claims that DoubleVerify's customers shifted ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where the company's capabilities were limited [3]. - It is alleged that the monetization of DoubleVerify's Activation Services was hindered by the high costs and time required to develop technology for closed platforms [3]. - The lawsuit states that competitors were better positioned to integrate AI into their offerings, negatively impacting DoubleVerify's competitive edge and profitability [3]. - DoubleVerify is accused of systematically overbilling customers for ad impressions served to bots [3]. - The risk disclosures provided by DoubleVerify were claimed to be materially false and misleading, presenting adverse facts as mere possibilities [3]. Group 2: Impact on Stock Performance - Following a lower revenue growth expectation announcement on February 28, 2024, DoubleVerify's stock price fell over 21% [4]. - On May 7, 2024, after cutting its full-year 2024 revenue outlook due to reduced customer ad spending, the stock price dropped nearly 39% [5]. - On February 27, 2025, DoubleVerify reported lower-than-expected fourth quarter 2024 sales and earnings, leading to a stock price decline of more than 36% [6]. Group 3: Legal Process and Firm Background - Investors who purchased DoubleVerify common stock during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, representing the interests of the class [7]. - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. for alleged securities fraud and unlawful business practices, with investors encouraged to join the lawsuit [1][2]. Company Performance - On February 28, 2024, DoubleVerify lowered its revenue growth expectations for Q1 2024, leading to a stock price drop of $8.35 per share, or 21.3%, closing at $30.89 on February 29, 2024 [4]. - On May 7, 2024, the company cut its full-year 2024 revenue outlook due to reduced ad spending from customers, resulting in a stock price decline of $11.79 per share, or 38.6%, closing at $18.78 on May 8, 2024 [5]. - On February 27, 2025, DoubleVerify reported lower-than-expected Q4 2024 sales and earnings, with a stock price drop of approximately 36%, closing at $13.90 on February 28, 2025 [6]. Industry Concerns - A report by Adalytics Research, LLC on March 28, 2025, claimed that DoubleVerify's advertisement verification services are ineffective, stating that customers are billed for ad impressions served to bots [7]. - The Wall Street Journal reported that DoubleVerify frequently fails to detect nonhuman traffic, contradicting the company's claims of helping brands avoid serving ads to bot accounts [7].

NEW YORK, May 27, 2025 /PRNewswire/ --Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of common stock of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DV) between November 10, 2023 and February 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period"). If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 21, 2025.So What: If you purchased DoubleVerify common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compen ...

Group 1 - MNTN (NYSE: MNTN) has made a strong public debut, positioning itself as a leader in revolutionizing television advertising in the streaming era [1] - The company claims to deliver targeted ads with accurate measurement capabilities, which could enhance marketing effectiveness [1] - The investing group "Value In Corporate Events" focuses on identifying opportunities in major corporate events such as IPOs, mergers, acquisitions, and earnings reports [1]