Core Insights - Adani Enterprises has successfully secured approval from creditors for its takeover proposal of Jaiprakash Associates, a bankrupt infrastructure firm, although the bid value has not been disclosed [1][5] - The acquisition will grant Adani control over Jaiprakash Associates' diverse business operations, which reported revenues exceeding ₹6,500 crore and assets over ₹35,000 crore for FY25 [1][5] Group 1: Acquisition Details - Adani will acquire 3,985 acres of land in Noida and Greater Noida, 6.5 million tonnes of cement capacity in Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, and a 24% stake in Jaiprakash Power Ventures [2] - The acquisition also includes a hospitality business with 867 rooms across five hotels in Delhi, Agra, and Mussoorie, along with construction and fertilizer plants [2] Group 2: Competitive Landscape - Adani Enterprises outbid four other competitors, including Vedanta Ltd, Dalmia Bharat, Jindal Power, and PNC Infratech, to take over Jaiprakash Associates under the corporate insolvency resolution process [2][6] - Vedanta had previously bid an enterprise value of ₹17,000 crore for Jaiprakash Associates but ultimately lost to Adani's proposal, which garnered the most support during the voting process [6] Group 3: Financial Aspects - Adani's resolution plan includes a total value exceeding ₹14,500 crore, comprising ₹6,000 crore as an upfront payment and an additional ₹7,600 crore payable after two years [6] - The net present value of Adani's offer is estimated at ₹12,000 crore, indicating a competitive financial strategy compared to other bids [6] Group 4: Regulatory Process - Following the approval from creditors, Adani Enterprises must now obtain regulatory approvals, including from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Allahabad, to finalize the acquisition [7]

Financial Performance and Targets - AECOM exceeded previously increased earnings guidance mid-points[13] - AECOM delivered on long-term 17%+ margin guidance five-quarters early (Q3'25)[13] - AECOM has a record design backlog of $23 billion[14] - AECOM's FY'20-FY'25 adjusted EPS CAGR is 20%[13] - AECOM is targeting FY'26 – FY'29 Organic NSR Growth CAGR of +5 – 8%[38] - AECOM is targeting FY'26 – FY'29 Segment Adjusted Operating/Adjusted EBITDA Margin of 20%+ (Exit rate by FY'28)[38] - AECOM is targeting FY'26 – FY'29 Adjusted EPS and Free Cash Flow per Share Growth CAGR of 15%+[38] - AECOM's FY25 Net Service Revenue was $7572.8 million[79, 99] - AECOM's FY25 Adjusted EPS was $5.26[79] - AECOM's FY25 Total Backlog was $24.8 billion[79] Strategic Initiatives - AECOM expects to double its Advisory business within three years[13] - AECOM's win rate on largest pursuits in FY'25 was 80%+[14] - AECOM has built a team of 200+ AI PhDs and advanced degrees in machine learning, math, physics, computer and data sciences[13, 34]

Non-GAAP Financial Information Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2025 East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor Light Rail Los Angeles, California AECOM was appointed by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority as the lead designer on the East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Transit project, providing engineering, architectural and design services for the 6.7-mile track extension. AECOM was appointed to Phase 2 work in Q4. Disclosures Forward-Looking Statements All statements in this communication ot ...

Key Takeaways Jacobs is set to report Q4 FY25, with estimates calling for higher year-over-year earnings and revenues.Demand across energy, water, transportation and infrastructure is boosting backlog and activity.PA Consulting and its strength in Life Sciences, Semiconductors and Data Centers support growth.Jacobs Solutions, Inc. (J) is slated to report fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results on Nov. 20, before the opening bell.In the last reported quarter, the company’s adjusted earnings topped the Zacks Conse ...

Core Insights - Artificial intelligence (AI) is identified as the greatest investment opportunity of the current era, with a strong emphasis on the urgent need for energy to support its growth [1][2][3] - A specific company is highlighted as a key player in the AI energy sector, owning critical energy infrastructure assets that are essential for meeting the increasing energy demands of AI technologies [3][7][8] Investment Landscape - Wall Street is investing hundreds of billions into AI, but there is a looming question regarding the energy supply needed to sustain this growth [2] - AI data centers, such as those powering large language models, consume energy equivalent to that of small cities, indicating a significant strain on global power grids [2] - The company in focus is positioned to capitalize on the rising demand for electricity, which is becoming the most valuable commodity in the digital age [3][8] Company Profile - The company is described as a "toll booth" operator in the AI energy boom, collecting fees from energy exports and benefiting from the onshoring trend driven by tariffs [5][6] - It possesses critical nuclear energy infrastructure assets and is capable of executing large-scale engineering, procurement, and construction projects across various energy sectors [7][8] - The company is noted for being debt-free and holding a substantial cash reserve, which is nearly one-third of its market capitalization [8][10] Market Position - The company has an equity stake in another prominent AI venture, providing investors with indirect exposure to multiple growth engines in the AI sector [9] - It is trading at a low valuation of less than 7 times earnings, making it an attractive investment opportunity compared to other energy and utility firms [10][11] - The company is recognized for its ability to deliver real cash flows and hold critical infrastructure, positioning it well for future growth [11][12] Future Outlook - The ongoing influx of talent into the AI sector is expected to drive rapid advancements and innovative ideas, reinforcing the importance of investing in AI [12][13] - The combination of AI infrastructure, energy needs, and the onshoring boom presents a unique investment landscape that the company is well-positioned to exploit [14][15]

Core Points - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation, alleging securities fraud affecting investors between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Fluor Corporation made false statements regarding the costs associated with its infrastructure projects, including Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, which were reportedly increasing due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, were likely to have a significant negative impact on the Company's business and financial results [3]. - The complaint further asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for FY 2025 was unreliable, the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategy was overstated, and the impact of economic uncertainty was understated [3]. Group 2: Legal Process - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until November 14, 2025, to request to be appointed as lead plaintiff in the case [4]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require any out-of-pocket costs or fees for class members [4]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky, LLP has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [5].

Q3 2025 Performance Highlights - Shimmick Projects revenue increased by 6% year-over-year[8] - Gross margin on Shimmick Projects increased by 67% year-over-year[8] - Backlog increased by 15% quarter-over-quarter, with a book-to-burn ratio of 1.7x, exceeding 1.0 for the first time since 2023[8] - The company achieved its first positive Adjusted EBITDA in four quarters, reporting $4 million[8] - New awards of $60 million were added to the backlog in October 2025, and $169 million in projects were selected as preferred bidder with awards pending[8] Revenue and Gross Margin Details - Reported revenue was $142 million, with $107 million from Shimmick Projects[8] - Excluding a one-time favorable GGB Project claim settlement revenue of $31 million in Q3 2024, revenue increased by $7 million, or 5% year-over-year[8] - Reported gross margin was $11 million, compared to $12 million in Q3 2024[8] - Excluding a one-time favorable GGB Project claim settlement gross margin of $11 million in Q3 2024, gross margin increased by $10 million year-over-year[8] - Shimmick Projects contributed a gross margin of $10 million, up 67% year-over-year, while Non-Core Projects contributed $1 million[8] Backlog and Future Outlook - Backlog is approximately $754 million as of October 3, 2025, with $191 million in new work added in Q3 2025, and Shimmick Projects accounting for over 86% of the total backlog[8] - The company's pipeline supports monthly bidding activity of $600 million to $1 billion[10] - For the fiscal year ending January 2, 2026, the company reaffirms its guidance, expecting Shimmick Projects revenue in the range of $405 million to $415 million, with gross margin between 9% and 12%[24] - Non-Core Projects revenue is expected to be in the range of $80 million to $90 million, with gross margin between -15% and -5%[24] - Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be between $5 million and $15 million[24]

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation, alleging securities fraud that negatively impacted shareholders between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Fluor Corporation made false statements and concealed significant issues related to costs associated with infrastructure projects, including subcontractor design errors, price increases, and scheduling delays [3]. - It is alleged that these issues, along with reduced capital spending from customers and economic uncertainty, had a substantial negative impact on the company's business and financial results [3]. - The complaint further asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for FY 2025 was unreliable, overstating the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategy and understating the impact of economic uncertainty [3]. Group 2: Next Steps for Affected Shareholders - Shareholders who suffered losses during the specified timeframe are encouraged to seek information about their rights to recovery, with no cost or obligation to participate [4]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky LLP, a recognized securities litigation firm, has a strong track record in securing recoveries for shareholders and has been ranked among the top securities litigation firms in the United States [5].

Core Points - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against Fluor Corporation, targeting alleged securities fraud that affected shareholders between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025 [2][3] Group 1: Allegations - The lawsuit claims that Fluor Corporation made false statements regarding the costs associated with its infrastructure projects, including Gordie Howe, I-635/LBJ, and I-35, which were reportedly increasing due to subcontractor design errors, price hikes, and scheduling delays [3] - It is alleged that these issues, along with a reduction in customer capital spending and client hesitance due to economic uncertainty, were significantly impacting the company's business and financial results [3] - The complaint asserts that Fluor's financial guidance for FY 2025 was unreliable, overstating the effectiveness of its risk mitigation strategies and understating the impact of economic uncertainty on its operations [3] Group 2: Next Steps for Affected Shareholders - Shareholders who experienced losses during the specified timeframe are encouraged to seek information on their rights to recovery, with no cost or obligation to participate [4] Group 3: Legal Representation - Levi & Korsinsky LLP, a recognized securities litigation firm, has a history of securing substantial recoveries for shareholders and has been ranked among the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [5]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fluor Corporation securities between February 18, 2025, and July 31, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on November 14, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Fluor securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by November 14, 2025 [2] - The lawsuit alleges that Fluor made false and misleading statements regarding project costs and financial guidance, which negatively impacted its business and financial results [4] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3] - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a leading figure in the plaintiffs' bar [3]