稀土及关键矿产
Search documents
US-Australia sign rare earths partnership to counter China’s dominance
Invezz· 2025-10-21 15:30
The United States and Australia have reached a new agreement aimed at strengthening the supply of rare earths and other critical minerals, reflecting ongoing concerns over China's dominance of the market. The deal is part of broader efforts by the Trump administration to secure strategic access to these essential materials, which are crucial for defense ...
美国最急需的是什么?网友的回复亮了:不是中国稀土,是铥镭铑钼
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-21 14:22
Core Insights - The humorous combination of elements "Thulium, Radium, Rhodium, Molybdenum" reflects a serious international competition over key minerals, highlighting China's increasing influence in strategic resource sectors [1][3] - The inclusion of Thulium (Tm) and Molybdenum (Mo) in China's export control list indicates significant challenges for the U.S. high-precision manufacturing industry in accessing these critical materials [3] - China's strategic positioning in the rare earth and key mineral sectors serves as a vital leverage in international competition, marking a shift in the balance of power in resource control [3] Group 1 - The phrase "Thulium, Radium, Rhodium, Molybdenum" has sparked discussions about the critical minerals needed by the U.S., with a focus on the implications of China's export controls [1][3] - The U.S. is facing unprecedented difficulties in obtaining Thulium and Molybdenum, which are essential for its supply chain, due to China's recent export restrictions [3] - China's ability to control access to these two elements demonstrates its strategic planning and strength in resource management, a situation unprecedented in over a century of international relations [3] Group 2 - The viral nature of the phrase underscores the importance of language and chemical knowledge in understanding the complexities of resource competition [4] - The ongoing debate about prioritizing technical knowledge over cultural literacy is seen as shortsighted, as national competition requires both hard technology and soft cultural power [4] - A balanced understanding of both literature and science is essential for grasping the nuances of resource conflicts and maintaining a competitive edge in global discourse [4]