India Consumer Asia Pacific Industry View In-Line June 23, 2025 07:30 AM GMT Investor Presentation | Asia Pacific Asia Summer School: India Consumer Staples This presentation introduces India's Consumer Staples sector, with a focus on the dynamics driving demand, how consumer companies make money, how stocks in the sector trade, and the indicators one should track to stay ahead of the curve. | | | Morgan Stanley does and seeks to do business with companies covered in Morgan Stanley Research. As a result, in ...

Core Insights - The rivalry between Procter & Gamble (PG) and Unilever (UL) is significant in the global consumer goods sector, with both companies dominating the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) market [1][4]. Procter & Gamble (PG) - PG is recognized for its brand-heavy strategy, focusing on high-margin household and personal care products, which grants it strong pricing power and market dominance in North America [2][5]. - The company operates in over 180 countries with a portfolio of well-known brands, creating a competitive moat that allows for swift adaptation to market changes [5][6]. - PG emphasizes brand superiority and innovation, investing in differentiated products across various price tiers, which helps maintain consumer loyalty without heavy discounting [6][7]. - Despite facing potential tariff costs projected at $1-$1.5 billion annually, PG is managing these impacts through supply-chain localization and strategic pricing adjustments [8]. - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for PG's fiscal 2025 sales and EPS indicates year-over-year growth of 0.2% and 3%, respectively, with projected increases of 2.6% and 3.2% in fiscal 2026 [17]. - PG's stock trades at a forward P/E multiple of 24.06, above its 5-year median, indicating a premium valuation that reflects its consistency and brand strength [22][26]. Unilever (UL) - UL adopts a diversified approach with operations in over 190 countries, focusing on both developed and emerging markets, which enhances its market coverage [9][10]. - The company's "Power Brands" account for over 75% of its turnover, demonstrating resilience and growth potential, particularly in developed markets [10][11]. - Under new leadership, UL is pursuing a consumer-focused strategy that emphasizes premiumization and digital marketing, aligning its products with evolving consumer preferences [12][16]. - Unilever's financial performance shows underlying sales growth of 3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2025, with strong contributions from personal care and wellbeing categories [14]. - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for UL's fiscal 2025 sales and EPS suggests year-over-year growth of 4.4% and 2.5%, respectively, with projected increases of 3.2% and 6.1% in fiscal 2026 [17]. - UL's stock has outperformed PG, with a total return of 19.1% over the past year, compared to PG's 3.8% growth [20]. - UL trades at a forward P/E multiple of 18.85, indicating it may be undervalued relative to PG, presenting a potential long-term investment opportunity [22][25]. Comparative Analysis - Both companies have experienced downward estimate revisions recently, but UL shows stronger projected revenue growth compared to PG [19]. - Unilever's more attractive valuation and diversified global presence position it favorably for future growth, while PG's premium valuation reflects its defensive qualities [25][26]. - Investor sentiment is shifting towards UL, supported by positive revisions to its earnings estimates, indicating confidence in its financial performance [28].

出口链有哪些短期超跌及中长期机会？20250507 摘要 • 静态估算显示，利用 2018-2019 年数据计算得出关税弹性为 1.7，即中 美贸易额因关税每增加 10%而萎缩 17%。通过分析上市公司对美营收敞 口，结合营收下降与净利润下降系数 1.3，可评估各行业净利润受损情况。 • 部分行业如消费电子、厨电、工业金属和能源金属已现超跌，股价跌幅超 过净利润受损程度，估值显著下降。原因在于这些行业面临长期营收空缺， 需下调估值。 • 在维持当前 145%对等关税或更差情况下维持 125%对等关税加 20%分摊 抵消的情景假设下，各行业可能继续面临超跌风险，政策不确定性增加。 • 根据 232 调查结果，加征 25%关税（总税率达 45%）情景下，厨电、工 业金属和能源金属超跌明显，消费电子已被剔除。此为较为悲观的假设。 • 若中美谈判取得进展，关税退回至 54%水平并维持 232 调查相关品种的 豁免状态，目前超跌行业与现状相似，部分行业反弹空间较大。 • 最乐观情景下，取消 125%对等关税，仅加征 20%反倾销关税，且不新增 25%关税产品，小家电、厨电、消费电子、电池、通信设备、纺织制造及 部分工业 ...