《地平线》系列
Search documents
索尼与腾讯达成和解,游戏官司画上句号
猿大侠· 2025-12-20 04:11
12 月 18 日,加州北区联邦法院的一纸文书,为今年游戏界最受关注的跨国纠纷画上了句号。 信息显示, 索尼已正式撤回对腾讯旗下游戏《荒野起源》的侵权起诉 。目前索尼与腾讯已达成保 密和解,双方将不再就此事发表公开评论,并在一份联合表态中称,期待未来继续携手共进。 从 7 月剑拔弩张的法律指控,到 12 月握手言和,这出大戏在短短五个月内完成了从法庭对垒到商 业利益重构的转场。 在复杂的商业语境下,这种变化,也折射出全球游戏巨头之间深刻的竞合逻辑。 剑拔弩张的法庭对垒 这场纠纷的源头可追溯至 2024 年 3 月 —— 腾讯旗下北极光工作室群已立项开发《荒野起源》 (当时名为《代号:新生》),旧金山游戏开发者大会(GDC)期间,腾讯高管向索尼提交《扩展 地平线》提案,希望获得《地平线》IP 授权开发手游;4 月,索尼拒绝该授权请求。 《荒野起源》 2025 年 7 月,索尼旗下索尼互动娱乐(SIE)正式提起诉讼,指控《荒野起源》对《地平线》系 列 IP 构成"实质性抄袭",认为该游戏从世界观、角色形象到音乐风格都复刻了其核心创意,痛斥 其为"拙劣的仿制品",并提出每部作品 15 万美元的法定赔偿及永久禁令。 ...
腾讯《荒野起源》按下暂停键 索尼诉讼战局迎来关键博弈
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-17 05:31
2025年12月初,全球游戏行业瞩目的法律对决迎来阶段性转折。腾讯与索尼互动娱乐就《荒野起源》版 权纠纷达成临时协议,同意暂停该游戏所有市场营销及公开测试活动,并将关键听证会延至2026年1月 29日。 这场始于2025年7月的诉讼,因涉及"抄袭"边界界定、巨头战略博弈与行业知识产权保护等核心议题, 持续引发全球市场关注。 八个月后,腾讯公布自研游戏《荒野起源》,其红发女主角、机械生物横行的后末日世界观与《地平 线》系列高度相似。颇具戏剧性的是,索尼PlayStation中国官方账号曾转发该游戏宣传片并提及"未来 合作",但随后删除动态,双方关系急转直下。 索尼在诉状中指控《荒野起源》为"拙劣复制品",列举其角色设计(如红发女猎手形象)、核心视觉风 格(机械生物与自然共存的场景)及宣传素材构图均存在实质性相似。 腾讯则反驳称,相关元素属科幻题材通用表达,并指责索尼试图"垄断行业公共领域内容"。法律攻防 中,腾讯曾援引迪士尼"米老鼠"案例,质疑索尼对角色红发特征商标化的主张;索尼则提交35页文件驳 斥腾讯的"空壳游戏"论,强调埃洛伊形象已成为PlayStation的"来源标识"。 临时协议的战略考量:各取所需的 ...
索尼与腾讯达成临时协议 暂停《荒野起源》所有宣传
Xi Niu Cai Jing· 2025-12-05 09:58
据了解,驳回动议听证会与禁令听证会均定于2026年1月29日举行。在此之前,腾讯将于2025年12月17日提交针对索尼禁令申请的答辩书,索尼的反驳答辩 则定于2026年1月2日提交。 此前,索尼向加州联邦法院起诉腾讯,指控腾讯即将推出的游戏《荒野起源》抄袭其《地平线》系列游戏。 索尼在诉讼中称,《荒野起源》是《地平线》的"照搬克隆版",在玩法机制、故事主题、艺术风格、机械生物设计等核心要素上高度雷同,尤其是游戏中出 现的红发女猎手形象与《地平线》主角埃洛伊高度相似,可能造成玩家混淆。 据媒体报道,近日,索尼与腾讯就《荒野起源》侵权《地平线》系列一案达成临时协议。 双方提交的法庭文件显示,在2026年初举行关键听证会之前,腾讯同意暂停《荒野起源》所有市场推广活动和公开测试活动,并承诺游戏不会在2027年第四 季度前发售。 诉讼发起后,该游戏已陆续下架Steam页面、修改部分美术素材,并低调推迟发行计划。 ...
索尼对腾讯发起侵权诉讼,还放出了后者的合作意向PPT
3 6 Ke· 2025-07-31 00:02
Core Viewpoint - Sony has filed a lawsuit against Tencent, claiming that Tencent's upcoming game "Light of Motiram" infringes on the copyright and trademark rights of Sony's "Horizon" series, seeking to halt its development and seek damages [1][39]. Group 1: Tencent's Contact with Sony - In March 2024, Tencent executives approached Sony Interactive Entertainment (SIE) at the Game Developers Conference, proposing to obtain IP licensing for a mobile game set in the "Horizon" universe [3]. - Tencent expressed its interest in the "Horizon" series due to its high-value IP and international reputation, as highlighted in their presentation titled "Expanding the Horizon" [5]. - Tencent's proposal included retaining the original open-world setting of "Horizon" while introducing Eastern aesthetics and gameplay elements [9]. Group 2: Rejection of Tencent's Proposal - SIE officially rejected Tencent's proposal for IP licensing in April 2024, citing the current development stage of the "Horizon" series as a reason [13]. - Despite the rejection, Tencent announced the launch of "Light of Motiram" later in 2024, which closely resembles the "Horizon" series in style and content [14]. Group 3: Similarities Between the Games - The lawsuit details that "Light of Motiram" has appropriated many recognizable elements from the "Horizon" series, including world setting, narrative framework, character design, and visual expression, leading to public confusion regarding the game's origin [14][15]. - The narrative of "Light of Motiram" mirrors that of "Horizon," depicting a post-apocalyptic world dominated by giant machines, with players uncovering the secrets of a lost civilization [15][16]. - The promotional materials for "Light of Motiram" show significant visual similarities to "Horizon," including the use of similar character designs and environmental elements [18][21]. Group 4: Legal Demands from Sony - Sony's lawsuit requests the court to rule that Tencent has willfully infringed on the copyright of the "Horizon" series and violated SIE's trademark rights related to the character Aloy [37]. - The lawsuit seeks both temporary and permanent injunctions against Tencent, prohibiting them from continuing to develop or market "Light of Motiram" [37]. - Sony is also seeking statutory damages of up to $150,000 for each infringement, along with the destruction of infringing materials and recovery of profits gained from the alleged infringement [38].