Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the decline of the "high-end" perception of the one-lift-two-house residential model, highlighting various issues that have led to its poor market performance and the challenges faced by homeowners in this segment [1][20]. Group 1: Elevator Issues - The primary selling point of one-lift-two-house residences is their claimed privacy and quietness, but in reality, residents face significant elevator wait times, averaging 12.7 minutes daily, which accumulates to over 77 hours annually [4][3]. - During peak hours, elevator congestion becomes a major inconvenience, exacerbated by occasional power outages and maintenance, particularly affecting families with elderly members or children [5][3]. Group 2: Shared Area Concerns - Developers often obscure the high shared area ratio in one-lift-two-house models, leading to a situation where buyers pay for a significant amount of unusable space, with actual usable area potentially being only 65 square meters out of a 100 square meter purchase [8][6]. - Compared to two-lift-four-house models, which have a more reasonable shared area ratio, one-lift-two-house residences present a poor value proposition, leading to buyer dissatisfaction [8][6]. Group 3: Market Challenges - One-lift-two-house properties are difficult to sell, with an average listing time of 187 days, nearly double that of standard homes at 93 days, due to perceived low value for money among potential buyers [12][10]. - High prices and large areas deter many potential buyers, resulting in these properties becoming "dead assets" in the market [14][10]. Group 4: Hidden Costs - Homeowners often overlook ongoing costs associated with one-lift-two-house residences, such as property management fees and maintenance costs, which can significantly increase overall expenses over time [16][14]. - For example, a property with a high shared area can lead to an additional annual property fee of around 2000 yuan, further straining homeowners' finances [16][14]. Group 5: Community Dynamics - The design of one-lift-two-house residences, intended to enhance privacy, ironically leads to a lack of community interaction, with residents reporting a significantly lower neighborhood engagement index compared to standard housing [18][5]. - Studies indicate that residents in these homes face a 27.5% higher risk of depression, particularly affecting vulnerable groups like the elderly and homemakers [18][5]. Group 6: Policy Trends - Regulatory standards are tightening, limiting the viability of one-lift-two-house models, with new guidelines requiring at least two elevators for buildings over 12 stories, signaling a potential phase-out of this housing type [19][18]. - Developers are shifting focus towards more practical and community-oriented housing designs, moving away from the previously favored "high-end" models [19][18].

第一，一梯两户是指一个楼梯间同一层只有两户，至于一个楼梯间设置的楼梯及电梯数量则依规范设置，电梯设置要求是:6至11层（即12层以下）至少设 置1台电梯，12层（含12层）以上至少设置2台电梯（含1台消防电梯）；楼梯的设置:18层（含18层）以上至少设置2部楼梯（一般采用剪刀梯）。现在通 常都是一个楼梯间设置有2部楼梯（即2部剪刀梯）及2部电梯（1部客梯1部消防梯），有时称为两梯两户。此外，这种户型除公摊面积大的缺点外，其余 都是优点，在用地条件不紧张、房价不高的地方，还是建议推广此户型。 第四，首先，一梯两户本身就是小高层或者洋房，是改善的首选 ，价格贵是正常的。其次，一梯两户都是小高层或洋房，整体前后楼高都不会高，所以 采光就不会受影响。此外，一部电梯就住十来户人，比30层的高层强多了。最后，转手难易和整个二手房市场是一致的，而不是由房子决定的。 第二，"一梯两户"住宅存在以下核心问题，导致其被诟病为"不好住又卖不掉"的"不动产"：①居住体验差：其一，隐私与安全隐患：虽然开发商宣传"一 梯两户"私密性好，但实际两户共享电梯，日常进出频繁接触邻居，容易引发尴尬甚至尾随等安全问题。此外，部分邻居占用公共区域堆 ...