Workflow
估值因子(EP
icon
Search documents
华创金工基本面研究(三)估值因子研究:拙能胜巧
Huachuang Securities· 2025-05-16 15:17
Valuation Factors - The report identifies that the EP, BP, and SP factors show strong predictive capabilities across different sample pools, while the PEG factor performs poorly [1][6][10] - The EP factor demonstrates significant returns, with notable performance across various industries, particularly in manufacturing [1][40] - The BP factor excels in asset-heavy industries such as utilities and finance, while the SP factor performs well in the TMT sector [1][40] Sources of Returns - The report states that the mispricing between valuation and fundamentals is the source of returns from valuation factors, with significant positive returns from low valuation-strong fundamentals combinations and negative returns from high valuation-weak fundamentals combinations [2][41][46] Long-term Effectiveness - Valuation factors are noted to be effective in the A-share market, although there is a potential for diminishing returns as the market becomes more institutionalized [3][59][75] - Historical data shows that the selected portfolios based on valuation factors achieved annualized returns of 14.87% in the CSI 800 and 19.11% in the CSI 1000, indicating the long-term effectiveness of these strategies [4][11] Industry Performance - The report highlights that the performance of valuation factors varies significantly across different industries, with the EP factor generally performing well across most sectors [40][41] - The BP factor shows strong performance in heavy asset industries, while the SP factor is particularly effective in the TMT sector [40][41] Investment Strategy - The report suggests constructing investment portfolios based on the mispricing of valuation and fundamentals, utilizing factors such as BP, EP, net profit growth rate, and ROE for selection [4][41][75] - The strategy emphasizes the importance of identifying undervalued stocks with strong fundamentals to achieve superior returns [7][75]