Core Viewpoint - The recent internship program launched by Industrial Bank's private banking division, which offers internship opportunities at prestigious companies in exchange for significant deposits, has sparked widespread public concern regarding fairness and equity in access to opportunities [2][3][7]. Summary by Relevant Sections Internship Program Details - Industrial Bank's private banking division introduced an internship program allowing clients' children to intern at well-known companies like JPMorgan, CICC, Google, and Microsoft, with a requirement of a minimum deposit of 10 million yuan for new non-private banking clients and 5 million yuan for existing clients [2][5]. - The program had 40 available spots and the application period ended recently, confirming its existence through various private banking centers [2]. Public Reaction and Concerns - The program has triggered significant public debate, with many expressing concerns that it exemplifies a "winner-takes-all" mentality, where wealthy individuals can leverage financial resources to gain competitive advantages for their children, thereby limiting opportunities for those from ordinary families [3][4]. - Comments from the public highlight a perception of unfairness, with some questioning whether this practice amounts to a direct exchange of deposits for internship opportunities [2][3]. Industry Context and Implications - The trend of private banks offering educational services, including internships, is becoming more common as they seek to attract high-net-worth clients. This aligns with the broader strategy of providing value-added services that cater to the specific needs of affluent customers [5][6]. - The competitive landscape of private banking is intensifying, with institutions increasingly focusing on services related to children's education to enhance client loyalty and retention [6][8]. Regulatory and Ethical Considerations - Following the backlash, Industrial Bank issued an apology and announced the suspension of the internship program, indicating a need for clearer regulations regarding the boundaries of value-added services in the banking sector [8]. - The incident raises questions about the ethical implications of such practices and the necessity for companies and educational institutions to standardize the allocation of internship resources to ensure fairness and reduce reliance on private channels [8].