（来源：吴说） 作者 | Maggie Hsu 编译 | 深潮 TechFlow 原文链接： https://www.techflowpost.com/article/detail_28169.html 本文内容不构成任何投资财务建议，请读者严格遵守所在地法律法规。 您如何评估加密协议或产品的成功和增长？在 Web2 中，营销人员有多种衡量成功的策略。而在加密领域，尤其是在 L1、L2 和协议领域，市场营销策略 仍在制定中。有些指标尚不可用，有些指标不那么重要，还有很多指标需要针对区块链进行重新思考。 我曾与许多增长和营销负责人交流过，他们每个人都有不同的仪表盘，这很正常，因为对于 L1 或 L2 来说，增长的定义与 DeFi 协议、钱包或游戏的定义 并不相同。让我们更广泛地探讨这些差异： L1 和 L2 的 增长都与用户和开发者社区息息相关。我们可以通过查看 L1 和 L2 的月活跃地址 (MAA，Monthly Active Addresses)以及人们在其上构建的应 用数量来衡量其成功与否。MAA 的增长而应用的增长却不显著，这可能仅仅意味着少数热门应用或垃圾应用的存在；理想情况下，两者应该同步增长。 ...

迪拜法院裁定一名女子因实施加密钱包调包诈骗构成盗窃罪，判处两个月监禁、按案发时被盗资产价值 罚款，并驱逐出境。案件显示，该女子在迪拜一次商务会面中，以外观相同的硬件钱包调包受害者设 备，私下转移约 100 万美元数字资产。刑事判决作出后，民事法院进一步裁定其向受害者赔偿 430 万迪 拉姆（约 117 万美元），并按年化 5% 计付利息。法院明确指出，数字资产依法属于受保护的财产。涉 案女子之夫被认定为重要参与者，目前在逃。（cryptopolitan） （来源：吴说） ...

12月30日，随着全球数字资产市场的演进，RadexMarkets瑞德克斯观察到，加密行业正站在机构级普及 的十字路口。根据行业前沿预测，2026年将成为科技巨头与传统金融力量深度渗透加密领域的关键一 年。RadexMarkets瑞德克斯认为，尽管财富100强企业纷纷布局区块链技术，但市场重心仍将集中在具 有中立属性的基础设施上，而非由单一企业主导的封闭生态。 责任编辑：陈平 12月30日，随着全球数字资产市场的演进，RadexMarkets瑞德克斯观察到，加密行业正站在机构级普及 的十字路口。根据行业前沿预测，2026年将成为科技巨头与传统金融力量深度渗透加密领域的关键一 年。RadexMarkets瑞德克斯认为，尽管财富100强企业纷纷布局区块链技术，但市场重心仍将集中在具 有中立属性的基础设施上，而非由单一企业主导的封闭生态。 在具体的行业应用层面，RadexMarkets瑞德克斯表示，银行和金融科技领域将成为财富100强企业接入 区块链的主阵地。许多机构倾向于利用Avalanche或OP stack等现有工具包构建许可链，从而在保障数据 隐私的同时，通过桥接技术与公链保持交互。虽然摩根大通、高盛等巨头 ...

Group 1 - The rise of digital crypto assets is reshaping the traditional logic of asset issuance and circulation, with key elements such as white papers, smart contracts, and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) embedded in the asset lifecycle [2][3] - Digital crypto assets are defined as value carriers that exist in digital form and circulate within blockchain networks, characterized by decentralization, immutability, and traceability [3][4] - The lifecycle of digital crypto assets includes a complete loop of information disclosure, technical deployment, asset issuance, storage interaction, cross-chain circulation, data support, governance operation, and transaction realization [7][8] Group 2 - Legal definitions of core elements such as white papers, smart contracts, and DAOs are contentious, with varying interpretations across jurisdictions [27][30] - The legal effectiveness of white papers hinges on the authenticity, completeness, and accuracy of information disclosed, with potential liabilities for false statements [16][21] - Smart contracts are recognized as a special form of electronic contracts, requiring compliance with specific legal conditions for validity [17][24] Group 3 - Global regulatory practices vary significantly, with the U.S. and China having distinct legal frameworks governing digital assets, impacting compliance and operational strategies [21][22] - The legal status of DAOs remains ambiguous in many jurisdictions, complicating their participation in civil activities and liability assignments [30][26] - Existing disputes highlight the challenges of cross-border jurisdiction and legal conflicts, particularly in cases involving decentralized technologies [28][29] Group 4 - Compliance pathways for industry participants include adhering to established guidelines for white papers, ensuring technical safety, and clarifying governance rules within DAOs [31][32] - Legislative efforts are needed to create a structured regulatory framework that categorizes digital assets and clarifies the legal attributes of core elements [32][33] - The interaction between technological innovation and legal regulation is crucial for the healthy development of the digital crypto asset industry [33]