Core Viewpoint - The Philippines has faced significant domestic backlash after a mere 1% reduction in tariffs imposed by the U.S., leading to widespread criticism of President Marcos and concerns over national sovereignty [1][5][9]. Group 1: Tariff Negotiations and Domestic Reactions - President Marcos described the 1% tariff reduction as a "major achievement" despite criticism that it is a minimal concession [3][5]. - The Philippines' basic tariff was originally 17% but has effectively increased by 2%, raising concerns about the long-term impact on exports [5]. - Many Filipinos feel that the government has compromised national interests in favor of U.S. demands, leading to accusations of the Philippines becoming a "colony" of the U.S. [1][9]. Group 2: Economic Implications - The Philippines has a long-standing economic dependency on the U.S., which has exacerbated trade limitations and increased pressure on exporters due to high tariffs [3]. - Supporters of Marcos argue that the U.S. tax payments will alleviate the Philippines' financial burden and attract more American investments, positioning the country with the second-lowest tariffs in Southeast Asia [3][5]. - The media has highlighted that many Philippine export products now face tariffs as high as 19%, contrasting sharply with the 0% tariffs on U.S. exports to the Philippines [5][7]. Group 3: Political Landscape and Public Sentiment - There is growing public discontent towards Marcos, with many citizens questioning the government's alignment with U.S. interests while neglecting domestic needs [9][11]. - The criticism extends to the Marcos family's alleged ties to U.S. wealth and the perception that they prioritize American interests over Filipino welfare [9]. - As public anger rises, Marcos's political future appears increasingly precarious, with diminishing support domestically [11].