"我们需要全面准入权。我们需要获得该国的石油和其他资源，以便重建他们的国家，"特朗普1月5日乘 坐空军一号返回华盛顿时对记者表示，他刚结束在棕榈滩海湖庄园的假期。 随着委内瑞拉总统马杜罗被俘，该国政局的未来走向被打上了一个巨大的问号。 罗德里格斯在周日晚间的一份声明中称，她正邀请美国与其共同"在国际法框架内，制定旨在实现共同 发展的合作议程，并加强持久的社区共存"。 美国国务卿卢比奥在周日的多档电视节目中表示，美国正聚焦委内瑞拉石油产业，并密切关注罗德里格 斯政府是否有反对美国政策的迹象。 "这是既定政策，"他在NBC的Meet the Press节目上表示。"我们希望委内瑞拉朝着特定方向发展，因为 这不仅对委内瑞拉人民有利，也符合我们的国家利益。" 特朗普在接受《大西洋月刊》采访时也向罗德里格斯发出警告。他向该杂志表示，"如果她不做正确的 事，她将付出非常沉重的代价，可能比马杜罗还要大"。在空军一号上，他再次警告，"她将面临比马杜 罗更糟糕的处境。"编辑/宋祉奇 特朗普表示，美国石油公司将斥资数十亿美元重建委内瑞拉的能源基础设施。 特朗普称，美国将与委内瑞拉代理总统德尔西·罗德里格斯合作，但称还未与她交谈过 ...

据塔斯社报道，当地时间12月28日，俄国家杜马国际事务委员会主席斯卢茨基表示，俄罗斯国家杜马议 员代表和美国国会议员代表已同意举行会晤，会晤地点和时间等细节可能在近期公布。 12月28日，斯卢茨基表示，俄美议员将举行会谈。 塔斯社视频截图 当地时间 "双方原则上已经达成一致。目前具体细节尚未敲定，但这些细节有望在不久的将来逐步落实。"斯卢茨 基在接受塔斯社采访时表示。 斯卢茨基呼吁各方保持耐心："我们不需要为了会面而会面，也不需要为了在新闻画面上留下握手镜头 而握手。我们需要的是成果， 一项能够推动国家利益的成果，这其中首要的就是安全领域利益。" 本文系观察者网独家稿件，未经授权，不得转载。 ...

俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃：日本当局不断发表荒谬的言论，肆无忌惮地加剧台湾海峡的紧张局 势。其目的是将台湾作为遏制中国的工具，俄罗斯在台湾问题上的原则性立场是明确且一贯的，台湾是 中国不可分割的一部分，台湾问题是中国内政，中国完全有正当理由捍卫主权和领土完整。俄方多次敦 促日本政府停止重走军事化道路，回归日本和平宪法所规定的和平主义立场。 南非国会议员西利兹·孟亚：日本首相的言论是鲁莽荒谬完全不负责任的，这是一种无端挑衅。不 尊重双方既有政治共识，并破坏中日之间长期积累的外交互信。日本首相的做法向东亚乃至更广泛的区 域释放出危险的信号，中国要求日本首相撤回这些言论是完全正当与合法的。 央广网北京12月6日消息 据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻和报纸摘要》报道，日本政府5日发 布的数据显示，根据农林水产省对日本全国大约1000家超市的米价监测，截至11月30日的一周，每袋5 公斤装大米平均售价为4335日元，折合197.6元人民币，比前一周上涨23日元，折合1.05元人民币。打破 11月初4316日元，折合196.7元人民币的纪录。 在日本首相高市早苗作出涉台错误言论后，日本政府的内阁答辩书还在老调重弹所谓的涉 ...

日本首相高市早苗：我的责任是最大化国家利益，并从现在起与中国建立越来越好的全面关系。（路透）外汇交易员 (@myfxtrader):日本首相高市早苗告诉记者，“特朗普总统最近访问日本后，我们进一步证实了美日之间的密切关系，”“他告诉我，我是他的挚友，我可以随时给他打电话。” https://t.co/2zsVIBStgG ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent actions of Li Ka-shing, particularly the sale of port operations to foreign entities amidst rising international tensions, have raised concerns about national security and the prioritization of personal business interests over national interests [4][7][21]. Group 1: Li Ka-shing's Business Actions - Li Ka-shing's decision to sell the operating rights of 43 key ports, including those controlling the Panama Canal, to a U.S. consortium has sparked widespread criticism, with many accusing him of "selling out national interests" [7][8]. - Despite warnings from national regulatory bodies, Li Ka-shing has continued to pursue the sale by attempting to "disassemble" the transaction to bypass scrutiny [9][12]. - The involvement of his associate, Zhou Kaixuan, in managing public relations during this crisis highlights the importance of personal connections in navigating business challenges [14]. Group 2: Zhou Kaixuan's Role - Zhou Kaixuan, known for her high emotional intelligence and networking skills, has been a long-time business partner of Li Ka-shing, helping him navigate the complexities of the business world [6][14]. - Her public relations strategies, including charitable donations, have not effectively mitigated the negative public perception surrounding Li Ka-shing's actions [16][18]. - The attempt to use philanthropy to improve public image has been criticized as insufficient and commercially motivated, failing to address the core issues at hand [16][21]. Group 3: National Regulatory Response - The national regulatory authorities have issued multiple warnings against circumventing antitrust reviews, indicating a firm stance against the sale of strategic assets [12][21]. - Li Ka-shing's ongoing efforts to proceed with the sale, despite regulatory pushback, reflect a potential underestimation of the government's regulatory power [9][12]. - The situation underscores the increasing scrutiny of business decisions that conflict with national interests, emphasizing the need for business leaders to align their strategies with national priorities [20][21].

Group 1 - The recent delivery of rare earth mineral samples from Pakistan's Army Chief Asim Munir to President Trump indicates potential investment opportunities in Pakistan's mineral sector, valued at approximately $8 trillion [1] - The relationship between Pakistan and the U.S. is characterized by mutual interests, as Pakistan engages with both China and the U.S. for military and economic benefits, highlighting the pragmatic nature of international relations [1][3] - The U.S. lacks a complete rare earth industry chain and purification technology, raising concerns about the potential transfer of military technology from Pakistan to the U.S. [3][8] Group 2 - Historical ties between Pakistan and the U.S. have facilitated cooperation, with implications for regional dynamics, particularly concerning India and its relationship with the U.S. [5] - Pakistan's geographical position ensures that its relationship with China remains stable, despite its growing ties with the U.S., emphasizing the need for vigilance regarding national interests [7] - The high costs and long recovery periods associated with developing Pakistan's mineral resources may lead to U.S. investment, which could challenge China's position in the region [7][8] Group 3 - The importance of safeguarding core technologies, particularly in rare earth processing, is emphasized, as past experiences show the severe consequences of technology leakage [8][10] - The driving force behind international cooperation is primarily based on interests rather than emotional ties, underscoring the necessity for strategic calculations in partnerships [10]

Core Points - Russian President Putin emphasized that restoring comprehensive relations with the United States aligns with Russia's national interests [1] - The current U.S. administration is straightforward about its own interests, often prioritizing them, which Putin views as a rational choice [1] - Russia reserves the right to act based on its own national interests [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses the complex political situation faced by South Korean politician Lee Jae-myung, particularly regarding relations with China and the United States [1] - There is a rising anti-China sentiment in South Korea, which Lee Jae-myung attributes to possible orchestrated efforts, emphasizing the importance of maintaining cooperative relations with China for South Korea's economic development [3] - A significant issue is the trade dispute with the U.S., where a verbal agreement was reached for South Korea to invest up to $350 billion, but the U.S. later demanded renegotiation, claiming the terms were too favorable to South Korea [3][4] Group 2 - Disagreements have emerged regarding the execution of the $350 billion investment, particularly in terms of investment methods, areas of focus, and profit distribution [4] - Lee Jae-myung advocates for indirect investment methods through financial institutions, while the U.S. insists on direct cash investments [6] - South Korea aims to invest in its own key industries like shipbuilding and semiconductors, but the U.S. wants to control the investment direction [7] Group 3 - The U.S. proposed a profit-sharing model where it would take 90% of profits after cost recovery, which Lee argues is unsustainable given South Korea's economic context [7] - Lee Jae-myung warns that accepting U.S. conditions could lead to an economic crisis similar to the 1997 financial crisis, highlighting a shift from the previous administration's approach [9] - The ongoing negotiations reflect a broader struggle for South Korea to balance its alliance with the U.S. while protecting its national interests [12]

Core Viewpoint - The Thai government currently has no plans to reopen the Thailand-Cambodia border checkpoint, prioritizing national security and public interest [1] Group 1: Government Position - Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul emphasized that the reopening of the border will only be considered when there is no risk of armed confrontation or conflict [1] - The Prime Minister plans to instruct the Minister of Defense on policies regarding landmine clearance and disarmament in border areas to ensure public safety [1] - Anutin stated that true peace can only be achieved through a combination of negotiation, military deployment, and flexible policies [1] Group 2: Public Engagement - Anutin expressed his commitment to listening to public opinion, mentioning his history of visiting communities during his tenure as Minister of Health and Minister of Interior [1] - He reassured that he will continue to engage with citizens directly to understand their concerns [1]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around India's continued purchase of Russian oil despite the U.S. imposing additional tariffs, indicating a strong stance against external pressure [1][3][7] - India's oil imports from Russia are projected to increase by 10% to 20% in September, translating to an additional 150,000 to 300,000 barrels per day [1][3] - The U.S. tariffs have significantly impacted Indian exporters, particularly in textiles, jewelry, and seafood, with industry associations warning of substantial job losses and market share reductions [3] Group 2 - India currently meets about 40% of its oil demand through Russian imports, saving substantial foreign exchange and stabilizing domestic energy supply [5][7] - The Indian government is diversifying its energy sources, increasing imports from the Middle East, the Americas, and Africa, while still relying heavily on Russian oil due to its cost-effectiveness [5][7] - India's response to U.S. tariffs reflects a strategic assertion of national interests, prioritizing energy security and economic benefits over external pressures [7]