Group 1: Macro Timing Strategy - The macro timing strategy has an annualized return of 7.67% as of October 31, 2025, with a Sharpe ratio of 1.45 and a Calmar ratio of 1.67, indicating a maximum drawdown of -4.60% [2][4][5] - The latest portfolio allocation includes 7.01% in CSI 300 ETF, 7.99% in CSI 500 ETF, 55.94% in government bond ETF, 11.63% in soybean meal ETF, 5.02% in non-ferrous ETF, 7.40% in gold ETF, and 5.00% in currency ETF, with no allocation to S&P 500 ETF and corporate bond ETF [7][8] Group 2: Momentum Strategy - The momentum strategy has an annualized return of 18.25% since January 2020, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.88 and a Calmar ratio of 0.64, experiencing a maximum drawdown of -28.72% [9][10] - The latest portfolio allocation includes 27.01% in Huatai-PB CSI Telecom Theme ETF, 24.92% in Fuguo CSI Tourism Theme ETF, 21.52% in Xinhua CSI Cloud Computing 50 ETF, 16.38% in Huatai-PB CSI Smart Car ETF, and 8.17% in Huaxia CSI Artificial Intelligence ETF [13][14] Group 3: Sector Rotation Strategy - The sector rotation strategy has an annualized return of 10.00% since 2020, with an excess return of 7.27% relative to CSI 300, and a maximum drawdown of -42.98% [15] - The latest portfolio includes home appliance ETF, green power ETF, steel ETF, new energy vehicle ETF, financial ETF, and agricultural ETF, while excluding non-ferrous metals ETF and transportation ETF [18][19] Group 4: Copula-Based Second-Order Stochastic Dominance Strategy - The Copula-based second-order stochastic dominance strategy has an annualized return of 14.41% since January 2020, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.68 and a maximum drawdown of -42.62% [20][24] - The latest portfolio allocation includes 5.00% in Huaxia CSI Petrochemical Industry ETF, 85.00% in Fuguo CSI 800 Bank ETF, 5.00% in Fuguo CSI All-Index Securities Company ETF, and 5.00% in Bosera CSI Oil and Gas Resources ETF [23][25] Group 5: Quantile Random Forest Technology ETF Allocation Strategy - The quantile random forest technology ETF allocation strategy has an annualized return of 13.54% since 2020, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.76 and a maximum drawdown of -29.89% [26] - The latest portfolio allocation consists of 95.63% in technology ETFs, including 4.78% in Jiahua National Communication ETF, 4.78% in Tianhong CSI Photovoltaic Industry ETF, 4.78% in Huabao CSI Military Industry ETF, 76.51% in Ping An CSI Consumer Electronics Theme ETF, and 4.78% in Fuguo CSI Technology 50 Strategy ETF [29][30]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the performance of stock and mixed funds, with only 22.81% achieving positive returns on June 17, and a significant number of funds experiencing substantial net value declines [1][2] - The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 0.04% to close at 3387.40 points, while the Shenzhen Component Index decreased by 0.12%, the ChiNext Index dropped by 0.36%, and the STAR 50 Index declined by 0.80% [1] - Among the sectors, coal, public utilities, and oil and petrochemicals showed the highest gains, increasing by 0.89%, 0.82%, and 0.72% respectively, while the pharmaceutical, beauty care, and media sectors faced the largest declines, dropping by 1.44%, 1.24%, and 1.22% respectively [1] Group 2 - On June 17, the average net value growth rate for stock and mixed funds was -0.44%, with 76 funds experiencing a net value decline exceeding 5% [2] - The top-performing fund was the China Aviation New Start Flexible Allocation Mixed A, with a net value growth rate of 2.02%, followed closely by China Aviation New Start Flexible Allocation Mixed C at 2.00% [2][3] - Among the funds with a net value growth rate exceeding 1%, 11 were index stock funds, 4 were flexible allocation funds, and 3 were equity funds [2] Group 3 - The fund with the largest decline was the China Aviation Preferred Navigation Mixed Initiation C, which saw a net value drop of 6.89%, followed by China Aviation Preferred Navigation Mixed Initiation A at 6.88% [4] - Other funds with significant declines included Red Soil Innovation Medical Care Stock at 6.66% and Great Wall Health Mixed A at 6.17% [4][5] - The article provides a detailed list of funds with their respective net values and daily growth rates, highlighting both the top gainers and the largest decliners in the market [3][4][5]

Core Viewpoint - The China Oil and Gas Resource Index has shown mixed performance, with a recent decline despite a monthly increase, indicating volatility in the oil and gas sector [2]. Group 1: Index Performance - The China Oil and Gas Resource Index decreased by 0.52% to 736.04 points, with a trading volume of 11.226 billion yuan [1]. - Over the past month, the index has increased by 6.59%, but it has decreased by 3.91% over the last three months and by 6.98% year-to-date [2]. Group 2: Index Composition - The index includes companies involved in oil and gas exploration, services, equipment manufacturing, refining, processing, transportation, and sales [2]. - The top ten weighted companies in the index are: China National Petroleum (10.47%), China National Offshore Oil (10.06%), Sinopec (9.64%), Guanghui Energy (6.62%), and others [2]. - The sector composition of the index shows that energy accounts for 75.48%, industrials for 18.72%, financials for 2.34%, materials for 1.59%, consumer discretionary for 1.06%, and utilities for 0.81% [2]. Group 3: Index Adjustment and Management - The index samples are adjusted biannually, with adjustments occurring on the next trading day after the second Friday of June and December [3]. - Weight factors are generally fixed until the next scheduled adjustment, with special circumstances allowing for temporary adjustments [3]. - Public funds tracking the oil and gas resources include Huatai-PineBridge China Oil and Gas Resource ETF, Bosera China Oil and Gas Resource ETF, and Yinhua China Oil and Gas Resource ETF [3].