Workflow
博时汇兴回报一年持有期混合
icon
Search documents
通合科技股价跌5.05%,博时基金旗下1只基金位居十大流通股东,持有257.36万股浮亏损失391.19万元
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-07 06:23
Core Viewpoint - Tonghe Technology experienced a decline of 5.05% on November 7, with a stock price of 28.57 CNY per share and a total market capitalization of 5.007 billion CNY [1] Group 1: Company Overview - Tonghe Technology, established on December 21, 1998, is located in Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, and was listed on December 31, 2015 [1] - The company specializes in the research, production, and sales of high-frequency switch power supplies and related electronic products, including military products [1] - The revenue composition of the company includes: 65.68% from new energy power conversion products, 20.15% from smart grid power supply products, 11.90% from customized power supplies and testing services, and 2.27% from other sources [1] Group 2: Shareholder Information - According to data, Bosera Fund has one fund among the top ten circulating shareholders of Tonghe Technology, specifically the Bosera Huixing Return One-Year Holding Mixed Fund (011056), which entered the top ten in the third quarter with 2.5736 million shares, accounting for 1.65% of circulating shares [2] - The estimated floating loss for this fund today is approximately 3.9119 million CNY [2] Group 3: Fund Performance - The Bosera Huixing Return One-Year Holding Mixed Fund (011056) was established on January 14, 2021, with a latest scale of 5.818 billion CNY [2] - Year-to-date, the fund has achieved a return of 42.2%, ranking 1738 out of 8148 in its category; over the past year, it has returned 47.24%, ranking 921 out of 8053; since inception, it has returned 3.45% [2]
机构风向标 | 捷邦科技(301326)2025年三季度已披露前十大机构持股比例合计下跌2.08个百分点
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-10-30 01:25
Group 1 - Jebang Technology (301326.SZ) reported its Q3 2025 results, with 18 institutional investors holding a total of 55.9761 million shares, representing 76.99% of the total share capital [1] - The top ten institutional investors collectively hold 75.24% of the shares, a decrease of 2.08 percentage points compared to the previous quarter [1] Group 2 - In the public fund sector, one fund, Penghua Consumer Select Mixed Fund, increased its holdings by 0.23% compared to the previous period [2] - One public fund, Penghua Core Advantage Mixed A, saw a slight decrease in holdings [2] - Nine new public funds were disclosed this period, including various funds from the Fortune series [2] - One insurance fund, Qianhai Life Insurance Co., Ltd. - Dividend Insurance Product, reported a slight decrease in holdings [2] - Two pension funds were not disclosed this quarter, both related to Qianhai Life Insurance [2]
公募股票仓位集体攀升
Group 1 - Public funds have collectively increased their stock positions in Q3, with an average stock position of 83.28%, up 2.13 percentage points from Q2 [1] - The average stock position for equity open-end funds reached 90.14%, an increase of 2.26 percentage points from the previous quarter [1] - The concentration of holdings in public funds has risen, with stock open-end funds and mixed open-end funds seeing increases in concentration by 0.94 percentage points and 2.1 percentage points, respectively [1] Group 2 - Most fund companies have raised their stock positions, with only 37 companies showing a slight decrease; 27 companies have an average stock position exceeding 90% [2] - Notable fund managers have significantly increased their positions, with some funds reaching over 90% stock allocation, such as the funds managed by Guo Jie and He Chongkai [2] - Several mixed funds are nearing full investment, with significant increases in equity assets, including the Zhongxin Jian Investment fund, which saw a stock position increase of over 10 percentage points [3] Group 3 - Some funds have notably reduced their stock positions, indicating market risk; for instance, the fund managed by Wu Wei decreased its stock position from 90% to 60% [3][4] - The performance of style indices has shown significant differences, suggesting that fund managers need to evaluate not only growth potential but also pricing rationality and industry dynamics [4]